| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/04/2004 01:06:18 AM · #1 |
would 'incubation' artyste be considered macro?
|
|
|
|
11/04/2004 01:25:50 AM · #2 |
No I woldn't consider it a macro. For an online contest it can depend on monitor resolution, but typically the object should appear to be the same size or larger than it would appear in real life.
I do believe in the past, close-up shots work for macro contests on dpchallenge for people who do not have the ability to do a true macro shot.
|
|
|
|
11/04/2004 01:30:38 AM · #3 |
typically the object should appear to be the same size or larger than it would appear in real life.
Macro or perspective?
|
|
|
|
11/04/2004 01:35:36 AM · #4 |
|
|
|
11/04/2004 01:40:51 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by kyebosh:
not even close. |
lol... wish i'de said that |
|
|
|
11/04/2004 04:04:12 AM · #6 |
Well, I'm pretty sure this would qualify:
|
|
|
|
11/04/2004 04:07:57 AM · #7 |
| don't forget it's easy to put a magnifying glass between the camera and the subject |
|
|
|
11/04/2004 04:12:39 AM · #8 |
I believe the definition of macro in its proper sense means the subject appears the same size in real life as on the physical sensor. So for a 35mm sensor, something that's 35mm in diagonal would fill the frame.
In the case of DPC I think the challenge description mentions "or at least an extreme close-up", which I'm taking to mean something that shows lots of detail you otherwise wouldn't see without looking closely at the subject.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 06:04:17 AM EDT.
