Author | Thread |
|
10/25/2004 09:47:14 PM · #1 |
When I take a long exposure shots with my DRebel and then upload to my computer they appear to have blue and red dots all over them in various places. You can only see them when the image is at high resolution. Im not sure if this is a problem with my monitor, my camera sensor or something I am doing wrong while taking the picture. I have posted the picture here (warning the file is large I tried saving at lower resolution but you cant see it). My questions are as follows:
1.) Can you see the red and blue dots on your monitor?
2.) If you can see it does anyone know whats causing it?
Thank you for any help in advance
Sample Pic Here

Message edited by author 2004-10-25 22:21:19. |
|
|
10/25/2004 09:50:34 PM · #2 |
thats noise.
it happens at longer exposures
quick read about noise
google it for more info
Message edited by author 2004-10-25 21:51:58.
|
|
|
10/25/2004 10:03:11 PM · #3 |
Thanks for the link.
In that article it says that the noise should be much lower in new cameras. Is noise of this magnitude common even in DSLR's or is there something wrong with my camera. Also has anyone with a DRebel also seen noise of this magnitude. For the photo posted I had the shutter open for about 15 sec and got that much noise. I was hoping to get a remote for my camera to do longer shots to capture the star rotation effect. If noise like this is common how do people take photos like that with digital cameras. Am I doing something wrong or do I need a better camera for that? |
|
|
10/25/2004 10:11:25 PM · #4 |
I can't open the link you provided to the sample image
|
|
|
10/25/2004 10:19:34 PM · #5 |
That doesn't look like noise to me. This might be silly, but is it stars?
And although I don't think this is it: My fuji finepix has a pixel screwed up so every picture has a little white dot in the same place. However, it looks nothing like your red and blue dots. |
|
|
10/25/2004 10:25:08 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by moswyn: That doesn't look like noise to me. This might be silly, but is it stars?
And although I don't think this is it: My fuji finepix has a pixel screwed up so every picture has a little white dot in the same place. However, it looks nothing like your red and blue dots. |
I thought stars at first glance too but it happens when I do long exposure indoors and in the day time too.
Also I posted The image in the forum incase others have trouble with the link. I hope its not to big.
|
|
|
10/25/2004 10:27:56 PM · #7 |
What it is is "hot pixels." All cameras will show these, and the longer the exposure, the more severe they will be. They can be just about perfectly cancelled out by subtracting a "dark frame". Some cams can do this automatically (e.g. my ol' trusty Nikon 995) but, strangely, most if not all DSLRs seem to lack this feature.
If you Google "dark frame subtraction" you'll find some interesting reading.
Edit for typos
Message edited by author 2004-10-25 22:42:54. |
|
|
10/25/2004 10:32:12 PM · #8 |
It doesn't look like noise to me either. What iso are you using? Are the speckles on the same site in different shots? I mean, if you overlap different pictures, do the speckles overlap? By the way, I am a neighbor. We don't have many clear nights in Binghamton for astrophotography. I've found film to be better than digital for long exposure astrophotos. Digital is ok for lunar or planetary. |
|
|
10/25/2004 10:42:17 PM · #9 |
that is long exposure noise. Look in your manual and see if there is a custom setting that says something like "Long exposure NR
set your Long Exposure NR to "on"
Google this term "long exposure digital noise"
night spots
Message edited by author 2004-10-25 22:44:17.
|
|
|
10/25/2004 10:43:13 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by cloudsme: It doesn't look like noise to me either. What iso are you using? Are the speckles on the same site in different shots? I mean, if you overlap different pictures, do the speckles overlap? By the way, I am a neighbor. We don't have many clear nights in Binghamton for astrophotography. I've found film to be better than digital for long exposure astrophotos. Digital is ok for lunar or planetary. |
I shot these using ISO100 and after looking through some other images the dots do seems to follow some what of a pattern. Also its good to see there are other people from the Binghamton area on this site.
Thank you everyone for your input this has been something that has been bothering me for a while. |
|
|
10/25/2004 11:26:03 PM · #11 |
I have the same situation with Digital Rebel on shots over 2 secs long. I was going to send it in but it's such an easy fix in Photoshop I thought, what the heck, I'll clone em out. |
|
|
10/26/2004 06:59:29 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by kirbic: Some cams can do this automatically (e.g. my ol' trusty Nikon 995) but, strangely, most if not all DSLRs seem to lack this feature. |
That feature is on the 20D, but was not found on the 10D. I haven't used it yet so have no idea how effective it is.
|
|
|
10/26/2004 07:25:16 AM · #13 |
kirbic is on it. Hot pixels...and it is basically noise. My Nikon 5700 loved to do this, even with noise reduction. Found a program that remapped the sensor and it all went away (a do it at your own risk thing).
I have read that the camera companies will do this for you also (Nikon will anyway)
|
|
|
10/26/2004 08:02:00 AM · #14 |
I have the same camera and I don't have any spots like that on long exposures. Those are definitely hot pixels and they should be repaired either by Canon or with a program like the one dacrazyrn mentions.
|
|
|
10/26/2004 09:01:04 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by PhilipDyer: I have the same camera and I don't have any spots like that on long exposures. Those are definitely hot pixels and they should be repaired either by Canon or with a program like the one dacrazyrn mentions. |
Thanks, it's good to know that other people don̢۪t have this problem. I guess I will have to send the camera back to canon for repairs. Unfortunately this is the second time in less than 5 months of owning the camera that I̢۪ve had to send it back. I guess I just got a bad one. Thank you everyone for your help and input. |
|
|
10/26/2004 09:21:42 AM · #16 |
I found a free program that will get rid of most of the hot pixel noise.
you will have to take a long wexposure with the lens cap on to capture all the hot pixels then put that image into the program along with the image that contains the noise... it will then subtract the noise from the photo based on the BLACK image with noise.
//www.mediachance.com/digicam/blackframe.htm |
|
|
10/27/2004 02:39:46 AM · #17 |
How many would you consider normal? Taken at 640 ISO for 30 sec. I realize lowering the ISO will reduce them, but I wanted to see just how many I had on my camera.
100% crop:
full file: (1.4mb)
//www.pepper-land.net/photos/published/hotspots.jpg
Message edited by author 2004-10-27 02:41:12.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/31/2025 02:04:54 PM EDT.