| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/28/2016 12:31:36 AM · #1 |
| Can someone tell me where Nik's Analog Efex would fall in the standard editing rule set? After a read-thru, I am thinking I can't use it but figured it wouldn't hurt to ask. |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 05:29:43 AM · #2 |
The answer would be, "It depends which parts".
For sure I would avoid the Multilens and Double Exposure effects in Standard, and any Frames that add text to the border. After that? Under the old Advanced rules I would have avoided Zoom & Rotate, Motion Blur, Light Leaks, and possibly even some Photo Plate effects, but they would seem to be fine now, at least from a DQ perspective. Whether or not they are keeping with the "spirit" of the rules is something I believe the SC is allowing us to suss out on our own.
Message edited by author 2016-06-28 05:30:06. |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 08:44:15 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by JakeKurdsjuk:
The answer would be, "It depends which parts".
For sure I would avoid the Multilens and Double Exposure effects in Standard, and any Frames that add text to the border. After that? Under the old Advanced rules I would have avoided Zoom & Rotate, Motion Blur, Light Leaks, and possibly even some Photo Plate effects, but they would seem to be fine now, at least from a DQ perspective. Whether or not they are keeping with the "spirit" of the rules is something I believe the SC is allowing us to suss out on our own. |
excellent response. |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 09:45:16 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by mefnj:
Originally posted by JakeKurdsjuk:
The answer would be, "It depends which parts".
For sure I would avoid the Multilens and Double Exposure effects in Standard, and any Frames that add text to the border. After that? Under the old Advanced rules I would have avoided Zoom & Rotate, Motion Blur, Light Leaks, and possibly even some Photo Plate effects, but they would seem to be fine now, at least from a DQ perspective. Whether or not they are keeping with the "spirit" of the rules is something I believe the SC is allowing us to suss out on our own. |
excellent response. |
 |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 10:33:51 AM · #5 |
| Who needs SC when we have Jake? Soldier on! |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 10:48:27 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Who needs SC when we have Jake? Soldier on! |
Whoo-hoo!! Do I get to DQ next?! ;) |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 11:07:58 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Who needs SC |
who noes |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 11:08:01 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Who needs SC |
who noes 2
Message edited by author 2016-06-28 11:08:33. |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 11:23:03 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by Tiny:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Who needs SC |
who noes |
You have a misspelling there...
It's "who nose" |
|
|
|
06/28/2016 12:25:24 PM · #10 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 09:24:12 AM EDT.
