| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/21/2004 06:22:41 PM · #1 |
| I was wondering whether the new Canon EF-S lenses would fit onto the 10D, or are they made exclusively for the 300D and 20D? I read something about these lenses fitting deeper into the camera, possibly damaging the mirror. Does this hold for the 10D also? |
|
|
|
09/21/2004 06:24:32 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by nicoledb:
I was wondering whether the new Canon EF-S lenses would fit onto the 10D... I read something about these lenses fitting deeper into the camera, possibly damaging the mirror. Does this hold for the 10D also? |
I'm afraid so.
|
|
|
|
09/21/2004 06:32:26 PM · #3 |
| OK, thanks. Too bad, the new EF-S lenses seemed like a good deal for starter lenses, but only for 300D and 20D owners, then. |
|
|
|
09/21/2004 06:51:19 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by nicoledb:
OK, thanks. Too bad, the new EF-S lenses seemed like a good deal for starter lenses, but only for 300D and 20D owners, then. |
Yes, that's likely what Canon intended these for. Bear in mind though that someone starting with a new DSLR will be an intermediate user fairly quickly...
|
|
|
|
09/21/2004 07:04:38 PM · #5 |
You can try this out
//bobatkins.com/photography/tutorials/efs-10d.html
( link on how to use EF-S lesn on 10D ) |
|
|
|
09/21/2004 07:12:28 PM · #6 |
If I am not mistaken, the EF-S lenses only fit the 300D and the 20D.
|
|
|
|
09/21/2004 07:52:19 PM · #7 |
seems canon is just testing this new mount out.
only a couple lenses - started with 300d, and now testing on the richer folks as well.
i do wonder if the new EF-S is any better quality than the 18-55mm EF-S
|
|
|
|
09/21/2004 07:52:20 PM · #8 |
| There is a tab on the EF-S lenes that prevents them from being installed on a 10D or other EF mount camera. There are some who have removed the tab on EF-S lenses so that they will fit on EF mount cameras. It's definitely a "proceed at your own peril" situation as you risk damaging the camera and I highly doubt that such damage will be covered by the warranty. |
|
|
|
09/21/2004 08:46:53 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by soup:
i do wonder if the new EF-S is any better quality than the 18-55mm EF-S |
A review I read, DPReview I think it was, seemed to give the 17-85mm one the thumbs up.
I do not remember all the details but one thing I recall, which is what really appealed to me, was that the reviewer thought that the 20D/ 17-85mm combination was good enough to make it a single lens/body kit to take on vacation.
I admit that I like the idea of being able to travel with just body/1 lens and be able to cope with a wide variety of situations.
I will be picking up my 17-85 either today or tomorrow .... and if I had a body to go with it I'd be really excited *laugh*
|
|
|
|
09/22/2004 07:27:50 AM · #10 |
Well judging by my "kit" lens... The EF-s range is pretty crappy...at least for my experience with the 18-55. I was told it was an attempt to create a short boby series to rival with the massively popular series from Tamron.
|
|
|
|
09/22/2004 07:30:18 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by Gil P:
Well judging by my "kit" lens... The EF-s range is pretty crappy...at least for my experience with the 18-55. |
I think the 18-55 isn't very representative of the newer EF-S lenses. For a start they're significantly more expensive, and much better quality.
|
|
|
|
09/22/2004 08:05:06 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by PaulMdx:
Originally posted by Gil P:
Well judging by my "kit" lens... The EF-s range is pretty crappy...at least for my experience with the 18-55. |
I think the 18-55 isn't very representative of the newer EF-S lenses. For a start they're significantly more expensive, and much better quality. |
I sure hope so! but I have not seen or used the newer EF-s...and will stick to L-glass.
|
|
|
|
09/22/2004 09:48:24 AM · #13 |
Despite a thumbs up from DPReview I can't see anyong forking out the bucks for the 17-85. The Tamron 28-75 sells for considerably less, is faster at f 2.8, and is widely tested and reviewed, known to be a very high quality lens, and it fits all the Canon DSLRs. The 17-85 is a more expensive, relative unknown alternative that will have less resale value because of a more limited number of potential buyers.
That said, the new 10-22 is interesting but kind of expensive, hope it gets reviewed soon.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 04:13:56 PM EDT.
