|
| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/16/2004 04:05:01 AM · #1 |
"Lunatic Toons" by Neil Parmar. Published in Psychology Today Oct.2004
From dim-witted Dopey in Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs to the "psycho" in Aladdin, Disney classics may be teaching children to laught at and fear the mentally ill, according to a study in the Canadian Journal Of Psychiatry.
Researchers analyzed 34 full-length animated Disney films and found taht 85 percent of them denigrate mental illness by portraying cartoon characters as "crazy", "mad", and "nuts". Movies such as Beauty and the Beast, where Belle's father in hauled off in a "lunacy wagon", features some of the worst stereotypes the study found.
Andrea Lawson, study author and social psychologist at the University of Calgary in Alberta, concedes that fairy tales lack subtlety and that children don't necessarily take them to heart. Nevertheless, she says, "it's important that parents are critical of what their kids watch." Asking children how they feel about negative stereotypes in movies and on television "allows them to develp their own critical thinking skills," she says.
Bambi, notes Lawson, was one of the only Disney films free of negative references toward mental illness.
Although Beauty and the Beast is my favorite Disney movie, I have to agree with the study, even more so when I know how they COMPLETELY changed the story. Kids movies sometimes have comments directed to the adults watching it and that kids wont get, but something like stereotyping a group of people, in my opinion, will stick with the kids. I was in line at the store once and there was a woman with a kid that was obviously a Down Syndrome kid but no one made any comments...until a little girl maybe 4 years old ask the mother loudly, pointing to the Down Syndrome kid, "Mommy, why does he look like that? What's wrong with him?". Kids will say the darnest things...and now we know where they learn them.
June
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 04:16:56 AM · #2 |
I'm not quite sure where you're going with your anecdote on the down syndrome child. Why *would* anyone comment? In most line-ups I've been in, people don't say much of anything unless it's general discussion with the people they're with.. so why would anyone pick a down syndrome child, (or any other person that is a little "different" for that matter), to comment on? As for the 4 year old.. kids are naturally open, curious, and vocal. A 4 year old doesn't ask why a down syndrome child looks different because they are viewing negative portrayals of mental illness on disney.. they ask because they see something they haven't seen before, and want to know why. It was a perfect opportunity for the mother to calmly explain why he looks different and leave it at that, and it would have satisfied the 4 year old, I'd bet my life on it.
I mean.. you might know all that already, and I'm just mis-reading what your intent was.. but the anecdote just didn't seem to fit the rest of your post is all, so I'm a bit confused.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 04:36:36 AM · #3 |
Well, we all look different. I have yet to hear a kid ask the mother why that lady has black hair or why that man is so tall. However, I've heard kids ask about people with obvious mental retardation or physical defects on more than one occasion. I'm not saying Disney is directly responsible for this or that they are solely to blame, all I'm saying is that they're not helping. Also makes me wonder wether being discriminative towards people with mental illness or physical defects, and let's face it, we are, is cognitive or a learned behavior. Since the dawn of time, the mentally ill have been treated with scorn and abuse. We've claimed they were possesed by the Devil and put them in mental asylums perhaps to help them....perhaps to isolate them.
By the way, the title of the post was meant as a joke, I don't think Disney has done any of those thing on purpose.
June
Message edited by author 2004-09-16 04:37:22.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 04:39:46 AM · #4 |
Though I understand your concern regarding the depiction of the mentally ill. Disney has been getting bad raps for years, so this study just adds to dozens of others. Disney (and others) anthropomorphizes animals to the point where many adults have problems remembering that wild animals are WILD and dangerous.
I agree with Artyste regarding your link to the Downs Syndrome child. You don't even know that the 4 year old has seen ANY Disney movies, so blaming Disney is a pretty big leap. Young children also poke at pregnant females bellies and ask why they are so fat. They have to learn somehow.
I actually think we have become a world of non-reactors and people are definitely not permitted to say what they think anymore. Too bad. So sad.
Thanks goodness for Michael Moore.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 04:43:33 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Artyste: I'm not quite sure where you're going with your anecdote on the down syndrome child. Why *would* anyone comment? In most line-ups I've been in, people don't say much of anything unless it's general discussion with the people they're with.. so why would anyone pick a down syndrome child, (or any other person that is a little "different" for that matter), to comment on? As for the 4 year old.. kids are naturally open, curious, and vocal. A 4 year old doesn't ask why a down syndrome child looks different because they are viewing negative portrayals of mental illness on disney.. they ask because they see something they haven't seen before, and want to know why. It was a perfect opportunity for the mother to calmly explain why he looks different and leave it at that, and it would have satisfied the 4 year old, I'd bet my life on it.
I mean.. you might know all that already, and I'm just mis-reading what your intent was.. but the anecdote just didn't seem to fit the rest of your post is all, so I'm a bit confused. |
Well I agree with you artyste. Kids are curious and they will see something that they see as different, or haven't seen before and ask why it is like that. So i don't agree with chiqui74 for saying that the kid was 'picking' on the downsyndrom kid. If the kid had only seen blond haired people and then saw a black haired lady he WOULD ask why she was different. People with downs, are visually identifiable, and this little kid was curious about it. end of story.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 04:50:17 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by chiqui74: Well, we all look different. I have yet to hear a kid ask the mother why that lady has black hair or why that man is so tall. However, I've heard kids ask about people with obvious mental retardation or physical defects on more than one occasion. I'm not saying Disney is directly responsible for this or that they are solely to blame, all I'm saying is that they're not helping. Also makes me wonder wether being discriminative towards people with mental illness or physical defects, and let's face it, we are, is cognitive or a learned behavior. Since the dawn of time, the mentally ill have been treated with scorn and abuse. We've claimed they were possesed by the Devil and put them in mental asylums perhaps to help them....perhaps to isolate them.
By the way, the title of the post was meant as a joke, I don't think Disney has done any of those thing on purpose.
June |
Well, Height, to a child's perspective, isn't like it is for us.. so they don't really see the differences as easily. I have seen, on more than one occasion, extremely frank questions from young children regarding race, weight, freckles, eye glasses, wheel chairs, canes, funny hats, bright colored clothing, physical postures, and ways of walking. Also, try to keep in mind that things like weight, race, and physical attributes (eye/hair color) are so *commonly* different, that questioning it doesn't always happen, because children grow from the start *expecting* it.. unless they grow up in a predominant culture, and *then* you should see the stares and questions if they see someone different.. (blonde haired men/women/children who visit South America, Asia or Africa often get *mobbed*.) However, mental/physical defects *aren't* as common, and a child could go almost their entire childhood without encountering someone with a specific defect.. thus, when they are encountered, they inevitably question it.
It's *OK* for children to question. It's healthy, it's a part of the learning process. Where it becomes a problem is when people with mental/physical defects/challenges/handicaps, however you like to say it, are turned *into* "special" people.. and continually gawked at, or fussed over (beyond what is needed for their abilities), or pointed out. Then the child begins to *think* that they are that much different.. instead of being just another person, who is different in just another way.
This is where depictions in movies like Disney's, or in TV Shows, et al. start to become worrisome. It's not that they are causing children to question something they already *would*.. it's that it is enforcing the differences as something to be frightened of, worried about, or saddened by. Of course, the proper depictions can also help children simply understand. It's such a fine line, and every child, of course, will be different in how the interpret what they see.
So, after long winded typing.. lol.. We come to basically the same conclusion, just against different principles, and seperate thought processes :)
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 04:53:00 AM · #7 |
Hehe. That is a pretty funny read -- we can always count on psychologists to take a perspective so far out there that its only value is humour.
The arguement against the study is the same as it is against any work of fiction. If the individual has a grip on reality they have nothing to fear from fantasy -- if they do not have a firm grip on reality, reality is a fantasy to them and they are likely quite terrified.
I really wish people would take a bit more responsibility for their own actions and stop looking for new and inventive ways to 'blame' someone else.
As for a child asking an honest question about something they are not familiar with -- that's what children do! It is a perfectly normal, healthy thing for them to do (adults too, for that matter); and is to be encouraged at every opportunity.
David
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 04:55:06 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Britannica: Hehe. That is a pretty funny read -- we can always count on psychologists to take a perspective so far out there that its only value is humour.
The arguement against the study is the same as it is against any work of fiction. If the individual has a grip on reality they have nothing to fear from fantasy -- if they do not have a firm grip on reality, reality is a fantasy to them and they are likely quite terrified.
I really wish people would take a bit more responsibility for their own actions and stop looking for new and inventive ways to 'blame' someone else.
As for a child asking an honest question about something they are not familiar with -- that's what children do! It is a perfectly normal, healthy thing for them to do (adults too, for that matter); and is to be encouraged at every opportunity.
David |
lol. Pretty much what I said in my latest post, I just took a hell of a lot more blah blah blah to get there.. haha.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 05:08:54 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by Britannica: Hehe. That is a pretty funny read -- we can always count on psychologists to take a perspective so far out there that its only value is humour.
The arguement against the study is the same as it is against any work of fiction. If the individual has a grip on reality they have nothing to fear from fantasy -- if they do not have a firm grip on reality, reality is a fantasy to them and they are likely quite terrified.
I really wish people would take a bit more responsibility for their own actions and stop looking for new and inventive ways to 'blame' someone else.
As for a child asking an honest question about something they are not familiar with -- that's what children do! It is a perfectly normal, healthy thing for them to do (adults too, for that matter); and is to be encouraged at every opportunity.
David |
A "grip on reality" is what kids lack. They have a hard time separating fantasy from reality. If you read my second post a little more carefully, I clearly stated that I wasn't saying Disney was to blame and that I didnt think any of which they are being accused of in the article was done on purpose. Had you been the parent of that Down Syndrome kid, would you have encouraged the other kid to ask about him? Don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question.
June
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 05:13:35 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by chiqui74: Originally posted by Britannica: Hehe. That is a pretty funny read -- we can always count on psychologists to take a perspective so far out there that its only value is humour.
The arguement against the study is the same as it is against any work of fiction. If the individual has a grip on reality they have nothing to fear from fantasy -- if they do not have a firm grip on reality, reality is a fantasy to them and they are likely quite terrified.
I really wish people would take a bit more responsibility for their own actions and stop looking for new and inventive ways to 'blame' someone else.
As for a child asking an honest question about something they are not familiar with -- that's what children do! It is a perfectly normal, healthy thing for them to do (adults too, for that matter); and is to be encouraged at every opportunity.
David |
A "grip on reality" is what kids lack. They have a hard time separating fantasy from reality. If you read my second post a little more carefully, I clearly stated that I wasn't saying Disney was to blame and that I didnt think any of which they are being accused of in the article was done on purpose. Had you been the parent of that Down Syndrome kid, would you have encouraged the other kid to ask about him? Don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question.
June |
It shouldn't be a rhetorical question. I've worked with down syndrome children, and just about *every* parent of a down syndrome child, (save those that are extremely uncomfortable or ill-prepared), greatly encourage other children to ask questions, to become involved, and to learn more about their child. This helps the children become more comfortable, friendly, and easy going with the down syndrome child and gives a base for relationships to build.
I guess you know what parents of physically/mentally challenged children would want because you've spent a great deal of time around them?
Oh wait, don't answer that, it's rhetorical.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 05:25:08 AM · #11 |
Artyste, I can't say I've spent much time with parents of Down Syndrome kids, but if I was one, I wouldn't want others pointing it out. However, I do have some experience on the physcial defect subjet. My 10 year old sister is crossed eyed, even after multiple surgeries. She gets very uncomfortable around other kids because she has been made fun of before. She knows she's that way, we know she's that way, the last thing we need is someone pointing it out and making us all feel uncomfortable because she feels like crap. I only meant to mock Disney and the article in my original post, but I guess it got misinterpreted, my apologies!
June
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 06:30:27 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by chiqui74: Artyste, I can't say I've spent much time with parents of Down Syndrome kids, but if I was one, I wouldn't want others pointing it out. However, I do have some experience on the physcial defect subjet. My 10 year old sister is crossed eyed, even after multiple surgeries. She gets very uncomfortable around other kids because she has been made fun of before. She knows she's that way, we know she's that way, the last thing we need is someone pointing it out and making us all feel uncomfortable because she feels like crap. I only meant to mock Disney and the article in my original post, but I guess it got misinterpreted, my apologies!
June |
I do understand where you're coming from, and no need to apologize. I guess where the misunderstanding lies is in the difference between *genuine* curiosity, and the sometimes cruel disregard for feelings that children can have towards each other. My suspicion is that the latter is probably formed early in childhood because a *lack* of encouragement of the former.. but I digress.
I'm sorry your sister had, and has, to go through what she does. It's never an easy thing. I'm sure she, and you her family, will get through it eventually. I admit to having snapped a little too abruptly, and for that *I* apologize. I tend to get riled up about certain subjects, and this happens to be one of them.
Anyway.. I think we can let it stand on that, and just agree that Disney and entertainment and media aren't perfect, and that a lot more attention needs to go into understanding what our children are watching, understanding our children better *period*, and doing what we can as parents to help our children understand the world around them better.
And maybe.. just maybe.. one day we won't have to feel uncomfortable about our myriad differences.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 08:55:55 AM · #13 |
As the parent of a toddler, let me say, they (or at least he) does ask about height, hair color, etc. There is a man at church with only one hand. He was talking to my husband this past Sunday, and my son stood entranced. When the man walked off, my son said, "he had one hand, but not the other one!" he has also asked why a woman was fat (that was embarrassing), why a man was so tall (he was!), etc. They are just naturally curious -- I think the maliciousness is learned (maybe from Disney, maybe from parents, probably from other kids)
Oh yea, back to the original point, my son, to the best of my knowledge, has only seen one disney movie (NEMO).
Now, about those subliminal sexual undertones found in the Disney cartoons . . . . .
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 08:59:04 AM · #14 |
Noooo kidding! Did you see the size of the feet on those dwarves in Snow White?
Originally posted by karmat:
Now, about those subliminal sexual undertones found in the Disney cartoons . . . . . |
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 09:02:31 AM · #15 |
Personally, I think the people who made this study, have WAY too much free time. THEY ARE CARTOONS! *sigh* damned rabble-rousers...
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 09:08:16 AM · #16 |
I would be more worried if my child saw another person with down syndrome or other recognizable difference and reacted with great caution or indifference, rather than asking about it. That would make me wonder why my child feels something is hush hush and can't be openly talked about...too many disney movies perhaps?
Edit: chiqui74, thanks for posting the article...it was definitely interesting, but I do find the premise behind it kind of silly.
Message edited by author 2004-09-16 09:09:37. |
|
|
|
09/16/2004 01:57:57 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by chiqui74: Artyste, I can't say I've spent much time with parents of Down Syndrome kids, but if I was one, I wouldn't want others pointing it out. |
My sister-in-law has cerebal palsy: we're all very accustomed to being pointed at by children in public. The mother's attitude is to help her child live as normal a life as possible, which entails bringing her out in public.
The more pointing, the more childish questioning, the more patient adult answering, the more understanding, the better.
Keeping mental disability under wraps only serves to continue the surrounding myths.
On a more lighter note, if we were to criticise anyone for using terms such as 'mad' and 'crazy' without giving consideration for the context within which they were used, we'd be condemning virtually every movie ever produced. |
|
|
|
09/16/2004 02:10:57 PM · #18 |
As a piece of 'research' I expect this to end up here.
I can't believe psychiatrists would have got involved in this, psychologists maybe, but far more likely sociologists. |
|
|
|
09/16/2004 02:17:18 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by Koriyama:
Keeping mental disability under wraps only serves to continue the surrounding myths.
|
Very well said. |
|
|
|
09/16/2004 02:47:10 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by chiqui74: A "grip on reality" is what kids lack. They have a hard time separating fantasy from reality. If you read my second post a little more carefully, I clearly stated that I wasn't saying Disney was to blame and that I didnt think any of which they are being accused of in the article was done on purpose. Had you been the parent of that Down Syndrome kid, would you have encouraged the other kid to ask about him? Don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question.
June |
June I thought I had made it clear I was directing my comments at the writer of the article and at people in general -- not directly at you personally. Sorry for any misunderstanding.
Kids have a wonderful grip on reality, it's the adults that add in a lot of rubbish. A child will look at the world around them -- and actually see the world around them -- most adults only see the world around them in terms of the stresses of life. To relate it to your example, the child had a natural curiousity, what is unnatural is the fabricated 'reality' adults place on top of it that it must be ignored or that it is something to be embarassed about.
Children will switch from one 'game' to another; in this one he is the 'good guy', but in that one a 'bad guy'. But then, as they get older, they are taught they must play the game of 'grown up', and things get very unhappy after that -- unless the child can find some way to hold onto the happiness of childhood -- some small aspect of their life they can keep from becoming artificially complex and troublesome.
As for children behaving badly toward each other; they have far more likley role models in the adults around them, than they ever will in cartoons. But these adults are not meaning to be 'bad' they are just so mired down in the added complexities of life they don't have time to be 'nice' to each other.
The public school system (at least here in the US) probably has a lot to do with it as well -- to quote something I read once, "who decided the best environment for a 12 year old to learn is in a room with 30 other 12 year olds?" Some people like having lots of others around, some like having just a few. Both are being acceptably sociable, just to the differeing degrees of their personal tastes.
You likely have a number of friends that you enjoy being around, but what happens when they bring their friends and the numbers start to swell. It's possible you are one of those that can never seem to get enough people around you, but most (myself included) start getting uncomfortable when it gets to large of a group to be intimately familiar with. (the word 'intimate' used very loosely here) I will stop being who I am around my close circle of friends in those situation. I have been taught the added complexity that I must 'play act' a game of fantasy with these people that I am around -- and play nice, pretending I really want to be there. Where did I learn this? In school, surrounded by 90 other people that have nothing more in common than that we were all approximately the same age. Subgroups were formed, social borders drawn and in some cases 'war' was declared. Very much modeled after the 'role models' of the "real" world.
To answer your rhetorical question, because it is an important one; I encourage every kid (of any age) to pursue whatever they have a curiousity about, for exactly as long as they are curious about it. As long as the intention it is done in is not one of unreasonable hostility (being mad is quite natural in the appropriate situations), I see no problem with any manner of questioning.
David
|
|
|
|
09/16/2004 03:14:05 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by Britannica: To answer your rhetorical question, because it is an important one; I encourage every kid (of any age) to pursue whatever they have a curiousity about, for exactly as long as they are curious about it. As long as the intention it is done in is not one of unreasonable hostility (being mad is quite natural in the appropriate situations), I see no problem with any manner of questioning.
David |
Kids' curiosity is, of course, natural. What shapes them, however, is the adults' response. |
|
|
|
09/17/2004 10:56:41 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by Koriyama: Originally posted by Britannica: To answer your rhetorical question, because it is an important one; I encourage every kid (of any age) to pursue whatever they have a curiousity about, for exactly as long as they are curious about it. As long as the intention it is done in is not one of unreasonable hostility (being mad is quite natural in the appropriate situations), I see no problem with any manner of questioning.
David |
Kids' curiosity is, of course, natural. What shapes them, however, is the adults' response. |
Well put.
|
|
|
|
09/18/2004 01:33:20 AM · #23 |
Originally posted by Koriyama: Originally posted by Britannica: To answer your rhetorical question, because it is an important one; I encourage every kid (of any age) to pursue whatever they have a curiousity about, for exactly as long as they are curious about it. As long as the intention it is done in is not one of unreasonable hostility (being mad is quite natural in the appropriate situations), I see no problem with any manner of questioning.
David |
Kids' curiosity is, of course, natural. What shapes them, however, is the adults' response. |
I agree. The whole hush-hush, "we must not talk about that" attitude is harmful to all involved -- and does no good at all.
David
|
|
|
|
09/18/2004 01:55:38 AM · #24 |
hehe i remember when little kids would point at me and ask "mommy, why does he have blue hair?"
|
|
|
|
Current Server Time: 11/15/2025 08:41:10 AM |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/15/2025 08:41:10 AM EST.
|