| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/05/2004 04:17:32 PM · #1 |
Hey, we must get something. :)
|
|
|
|
09/05/2004 04:35:48 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
09/05/2004 04:37:40 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
09/05/2004 04:39:52 PM · #4 |
Well of course, how lack luster would that be.
|
|
|
|
09/05/2004 04:40:29 PM · #5 |
|
|
|
09/05/2004 04:40:59 PM · #6 |
I'm sorry, i can't speak for Jon, however, but i found it comical.-LOL-
|
|
|
|
09/05/2004 04:41:29 PM · #7 |
| anyone with < 5.000 avg votes? 4.5? |
|
|
|
09/05/2004 04:42:06 PM · #8 |
i would say no ribbons at the very least.
|
|
|
|
09/07/2004 08:52:10 PM · #9 |
| I for one, don't want it. The idea, to me at least, is that you took the best photo against any who care to enter that week, or month. |
|
|
|
09/07/2004 08:58:18 PM · #10 |
|
|
|
09/07/2004 08:59:34 PM · #11 |
im in, i think the criteria should be no ribbons.
|
|
|
|
09/07/2004 09:25:18 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by kyebosh:
anyone with < 5.000 avg votes? 4.5? |
No, anyone with less than 5.5...actually, make it 5.1. |
|
|
|
09/07/2004 09:27:39 PM · #13 |
I'm with ya guys. I also suggest that only the masters have the right to vote. That way, we, losers will have first quality comment in order to get in the other group...
|
|
|
|
09/07/2004 09:32:43 PM · #14 |
Even though I have never won a ribbon I don't like this as an idea.
Three new people would end up with ribbons sure ..... but the "value" of those ribbons would not be the same as a standard won ribbon. I would go as far as hoping they would be marked as not being the usual ribbon.
For instance, set the barrier for instance at "average vote below 4.0", people enter, all very average shots at best (for sake of argument) and then 3 average quality shots end up with ribbons and suddenly they compare to someone who has one ribbon won against the full competition.
|
|
|
|
09/07/2004 09:37:16 PM · #15 |
| Bad idea, bad idea, bad idea...for the reasons given several times in other threads as summed up by Natator. |
|
|
|
09/07/2004 09:39:16 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by Natator:
Even though I have never won a ribbon I don't like this as an idea.
Three new people would end up with ribbons sure ..... but the "value" of those ribbons would not be the same as a standard won ribbon. I would go as far as hoping they would be marked as not being the usual ribbon.
For instance, set the barrier for instance at "average vote below 4.0", people enter, all very average shots at best (for sake of argument) and then 3 average quality shots end up with ribbons and suddenly they compare to someone who has one ribbon won against the full competition. |
As seen in many thread in the last few weeks there are a bunch of people here that think that many photographer on this site should have ribbonned or have the talent to but didn't. Let's just say that you take a photography and in the challenge you score 7.6 wich in many challenge is enough to ribbon but there are 3 other photo that beat you and the blue get above 8. Then you still have an amazing photography and you are in the group that "never-ribbonned-but-should-have-or-have-the-talent-to" I don't think an average shot would win this challenge. In a regular challenge we see amazing shot up to the 20th place. In a "loser-challenge" maybe one of these could win and I think it's okay.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/14/2025 06:50:08 AM EDT.
