| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/05/2013 06:51:29 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
I'm not sure I'd call it "useless": here's a shaky macro, at the default settings. Granted, when you view it at 100% the artifacting is obvious, but how could it NOT be? Meanwhile, at a more normal on-screen viewing size, the improvement is definite.
 |
if were referring to my comment, i should have prefaced it was worthless for those pics i tried. my earlier example showed much promise.
Message edited by author 2013-05-05 18:51:35. |
|
|
|
05/05/2013 09:09:48 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
I'm not sure I'd call it "useless": here's a shaky macro, at the default settings. Granted, when you view it at 100% the artifacting is obvious, but how could it NOT be? Meanwhile, at a more normal on-screen viewing size, the improvement is definite.
|
A little masking and it's almost 100% fixed. Nice!
|
|
|
|
05/06/2013 08:56:26 PM · #28 |
i couldn't get it to work well for a macro application. Though i m reading into newer tutorials like lynda and they suggest Shake reduction is coming to photoshop. Very soon.
We can apparently expect improved sharpening, easier upsample and resize, Camera raw improvements, greater flexibility with blur, easier flow between multiple open documents, etc.
Message edited by author 2013-05-06 21:01:37. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 02:17:18 AM EDT.
