| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/01/2013 02:50:45 AM · #1 |
Smoke II
Smoke
What timing.... just when  MinsoPhoto has given up! Doh! Bring out the incense and the smoke machines. |
|
|
|
03/01/2013 05:28:38 AM · #2 |
|
|
|
03/01/2013 05:49:29 AM · #3 |
|
|
|
03/01/2013 01:59:37 PM · #4 |
| I just got a notice today about a gallery here in Chicago with this exhibit that opens later this month: Smoking Kids by Frieke Janssens. Here is some of his work. It is set up but still disturbing (I guess that is the point). |
|
|
|
03/01/2013 02:07:45 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by markwiley:
I just got a notice today about a gallery here in Chicago with this exhibit that opens later this month: Smoking Kids by Frieke Janssens. Here is some of his work. It is set up but still disturbing (I guess that is the point). |
any image from the gallery would be a DPC BROWN contender. |
|
|
|
03/01/2013 02:14:17 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Basta:
Originally posted by markwiley:
I just got a notice today about a gallery here in Chicago with this exhibit that opens later this month: Smoking Kids by Frieke Janssens. Here is some of his work. It is set up but still disturbing (I guess that is the point). |
any image from the gallery would be a DPC BROWN contender. |
But the comment count would be extraordinary.. |
|
|
|
03/01/2013 02:22:57 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by Basta:
Originally posted by markwiley:
I just got a notice today about a gallery here in Chicago with this exhibit that opens later this month: Smoking Kids by Frieke Janssens. Here is some of his work. It is set up but still disturbing (I guess that is the point). |
any image from the gallery would be a DPC BROWN contender. |
I'm not sure I'd agree... The one with the girl blowing smoke rings def fits the target.... Do some b&w or retro pp and you'd be golden
-m |
|
|
|
03/01/2013 02:35:11 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by mefnj:
Originally posted by Basta:
Originally posted by markwiley:
I just got a notice today about a gallery here in Chicago with this exhibit that opens later this month: Smoking Kids by Frieke Janssens. Here is some of his work. It is set up but still disturbing (I guess that is the point). |
any image from the gallery would be a DPC BROWN contender. |
I'm not sure I'd agree... The one with the girl blowing smoke rings def fits the target.... Do some b&w or retro pp and you'd be golden
-m |
oh, the image quality and such is not in question...it is shock factor that would set a new record for the number of 1's on this site ... |
|
|
|
03/04/2013 06:30:05 PM · #9 |
| I am wondering if under advanced rule set you can change the smoke color in photoshop and invert the background or would that be against the rules? I didn't see it done in the other Smoke challenges |
|
|
|
03/04/2013 06:37:40 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Basta:
Originally posted by mefnj:
Originally posted by Basta:
Originally posted by markwiley:
I just got a notice today about a gallery here in Chicago with this exhibit that opens later this month: Smoking Kids by Frieke Janssens. Here is some of his work. It is set up but still disturbing (I guess that is the point). |
any image from the gallery would be a DPC BROWN contender. |
I'm not sure I'd agree... The one with the girl blowing smoke rings def fits the target.... Do some b&w or retro pp and you'd be golden
-m |
oh, the image quality and such is not in question...it is shock factor that would set a new record for the number of 1's on this site ... |
It's all be done before
 |
|
|
|
03/04/2013 08:20:18 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by Basta:
Originally posted by mefnj:
Originally posted by Basta:
Originally posted by markwiley:
I just got a notice today about a gallery here in Chicago with this exhibit that opens later this month: Smoking Kids by Frieke Janssens. Here is some of his work. It is set up but still disturbing (I guess that is the point). |
any image from the gallery would be a DPC BROWN contender. |
I'm not sure I'd agree... The one with the girl blowing smoke rings def fits the target.... Do some b&w or retro pp and you'd be golden
-m |
oh, the image quality and such is not in question...it is shock factor that would set a new record for the number of 1's on this site ... |
It's all be done before
|
I remamber that. and I was thinking " what the hell is going on here, it cant be, I think it just looks like cigarette " Bvy did a great undercover job. and voters punished him. |
|
|
|
03/04/2013 08:57:20 PM · #12 |
consensus requested... a standard smoke photo usually comes out grey/white in color. is it legal to use color gradient filters to colorize the smoke? ... the same kind of filters one might use to "warm" or "cool" the sky in a landscape photo? i realize that the filers use in this way could even lead to a "rainbow" coloring of the smoke.
thoughts?
-m
Message edited by author 2013-03-04 20:57:50. |
|
|
|
03/04/2013 09:21:15 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by mefnj:
consensus requested... a standard smoke photo usually comes out grey/white in color. is it legal to use color gradient filters to colorize the smoke? ... the same kind of filters one might use to "warm" or "cool" the sky in a landscape photo? i realize that the filers use in this way could even lead to a "rainbow" coloring of the smoke.
thoughts?
-m |
Yes.  |
|
|
|
03/04/2013 09:30:36 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by giantmike:
Originally posted by mefnj:
consensus requested... a standard smoke photo usually comes out grey/white in color. is it legal to use color gradient filters to colorize the smoke? ... the same kind of filters one might use to "warm" or "cool" the sky in a landscape photo? i realize that the filers use in this way could even lead to a "rainbow" coloring of the smoke.
thoughts?
-m |
Yes. |
i recall a rather vigorous discussion on "how can this be legal?", with the main point being that you added a "feature" of a rainbow in pp... and was this just a fluke of the SC not issuing a DQ? are there other examples that passed validation out there? |
|
|
|
03/05/2013 08:41:04 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by mefnj:
Originally posted by giantmike:
Originally posted by mefnj:
consensus requested... a standard smoke photo usually comes out grey/white in color. is it legal to use color gradient filters to colorize the smoke? ... the same kind of filters one might use to "warm" or "cool" the sky in a landscape photo? i realize that the filers use in this way could even lead to a "rainbow" coloring of the smoke.
thoughts?
-m |
Yes. |
i recall a rather vigorous discussion on "how can this be legal?", with the main point being that you added a "feature" of a rainbow in pp... and was this just a fluke of the SC not issuing a DQ? are there other examples that passed validation out there? |
just wanted to re-ask my question... are there other examples that passed validation out there? |
|
|
|
03/07/2013 11:12:29 PM · #16 |
| wow... so few entries... only 36 at 11:00 PM |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/15/2026 06:12:18 PM EDT.
