DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register) 
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> How much is too much
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 31, (reverse)
AuthorThread
 12/30/2012 06:29:41 AM · #1
I am just a newbie to the world of commercial photography so please don't blast me up to heaven.

I would like to know how much is too much when it comes to using from flecky board on exterior shots to editing your pic to the hilt so that there are zero blemishes.

Shots that I normally take are of people, outside using a relatively long lens with a short depth of field.

When I get back to the studio, all is good with picture composition and framing, but the pics seem to lack life.

So if I was to submit these to SHUTTERSTOCK, I joined yesterday, they probably would get rejected.

Is there anybody out there in cyber space that can help me into bringing my pics to life.

At the moment I use a pretty basic 5mp camera, but can borrow a canon EOS.

Is the secret in the camera?
Is the secret in the lens?
Is the secret in post production?

Kind Regards
John Brennan
 12/30/2012 06:41:45 AM · #2
There are no secrets.
 12/30/2012 06:42:22 AM · #3
Hi,Someone with knowledge and lots of words will be along soon.
 12/30/2012 07:39:48 AM · #4
post examples of what you mean,

what are you using? what lens have you got?

what lights have you got, what software have you got, what do you want to do/be have you got aspirations to be a professional photographer?
 12/30/2012 08:04:08 AM · #5
Too much is when it looks like it is too much (editing, that is).
Some examples of your work would be nice...

BTW, Shutterstock hates shallow DOF :(
 12/30/2012 10:36:04 AM · #6
So sorry guys, I cannot upload an image yet, I believe that one has to be a paying member to do so. I have not submitted any funds yet. My membership is the basic of all basics for no fee.

Let me look into this tomorrow and I will see if I can show you an image of what I mean.

Apart from that, thank you kindly for your help.
12/30/2012 11:37:45 AM · #7
Originally posted by h2:
Too much is when it looks like it is too much (editing, that is).

Yes, that.

Originally posted by h2:
Some examples of your work would be nice...

...and that.

I don't submit to stock, but when I edit photos of women, I remove major unattractive blemishes and do some modest skin smoothing and usually minimize crows feet.

Here's a recent example. Due to her 40's themed outfit, a fair amount of the glamor glow treatment from Nik Color Efex also helped. It's probably a bit over the top, but I think it worked for this particular shot. She loved it, and that's what counts.

full-sized image

On the other hand, men tend to get wrinkle enhancements. Upon seeing this photo, Jay's reaction was "Oh, my".


Message edited by author 2012-12-30 11:38:39.
 12/30/2012 12:15:07 PM · #8
You can post a link to your images if they are on another site (FB, FLicker, etc.). Commercially, models tend to look natural, with all the effects done in the hair and make-up. If they are glamour shots, they tend to get smoothed out a lot. If they are more for news, not so much. If your images are looking rather flat, it may be a combination of both the shallow dof and inadequate lighting. If you are using natural light, it can be harder to achieve that "pop", unless you know what you're doing. Results with natural light will be better if the bg is darker than the subject. These are all natural light, with minimal editing.
 12/30/2012 12:16:45 PM · #9
Originally posted by johnbrennan:


Is the secret in the camera?
Is the secret in the lens?
Is the secret in post production?


the secret is you have to be able use all three of them.

These were all taken with a 60D and a prime lens. Clearly you can see what photoshop will do. But you have to have have good starting material. the point isnt to make them look like barbie dolls, just their best.

before and afters







12/30/2012 12:26:14 PM · #10
Microstock is a who;e different beast and it really depends on the reviewer but I usually keep editing pretty basic both for the look and for time, I don't want to spend a lot of time for .25 a dl.

(the color version)


These are doing pretty well just starting out, i also have some with much less editing.

So if you are talking about editing for challenges here, stock or traditional commercial photography it is all different.
 12/31/2012 02:32:33 AM · #11
[b][i][i]You can post a link to your images if they are on another site (FB, FLicker, etc.)

I wish to thank all for their help. I loved the before and afters. Now I am endeavoring to upload a pic that I have on Facebook.

When I choose INSERT IMAGE and I cut and paste the URL, it gives me a posting error, Can anybody help me withy this one so that I can display an example?

Posting Error

In order to prevent spam, new users of our forums are unable to post URLs.

Please remove the URLs from your post and try again.
 12/31/2012 03:09:07 AM · #12
When you post a link, use the 6th box over (the globe looking one that is a hyperlink). Copy your Flickr URL then paste into the mask that pops up when you click the "hyperlink".
ETA: I think...

Message edited by author 2012-12-31 03:10:07.
 12/31/2012 03:12:30 AM · #13
How about just copying the URL to your narrative post and I'll see if I can link it for you...

Message edited by author 2012-12-31 03:12:49.
 12/31/2012 03:54:04 AM · #14

www.facebook/

photo.php?fbid=10151310111652829&set=a.10150511999887829.393119.573862828&type=3&theater

Great idea The Tourist, let's see if it works
 12/31/2012 03:57:29 AM · #15
facebook.com/

Sorry dot com
 12/31/2012 03:59:16 AM · #16
photo.php?fbid=10151310115397829&set=a.10150511999887829.393119.573862828&type=3&theater

The Tourist, also this one, if you don't mind.
 12/31/2012 04:33:39 AM · #17
johnbrennan, I tried it with the hyperlink, but its not working (linking). Sorry.

For those who want to go to his Facebook link, try this:
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151310111652829&set=a.10150511999887829.393119.573862828&type=3&theater

It goes to the Facebook site, but I don't have Facebook so I can't tell you if it goes to the photo he wants people to see.

Message edited by author 2012-12-31 04:39:00.
 12/31/2012 04:53:39 AM · #18
Originally posted by The_Tourist:
johnbrennan, I tried it with the hyperlink, but its not working (linking). Sorry.

For those who want to go to his Facebook link, try this:
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151310111652829&set=a.10150511999887829.393119.573862828&type=3&theater

It goes to the Facebook site, but I don't have Facebook so I can't tell you if it goes to the photo he wants people to see.


I think the privacy settings won't allow non-friends to access the pictures. Setting the privacy to public should do the trick or the pictures can be added to something disposable like photobucket.
 12/31/2012 05:00:04 AM · #19
If you are going to get into commercial photography you are going to have to master a bit of web savvy ness and learn how to share and optimise your pics

Go get a free Flickr account it's good for 200 pics and you can then share them here

If you are really serious about it then join here and learn it'll be the best $25 dollars you've spent it's driven my photography on massively
 01/01/2013 02:31:40 AM · #20
One image is available on flickr.
New users are not permitted to post URLs.
This is the posting error I get when I post the URL.

Posting Error

In order to prevent spam, new users of our forums are unable to post URLs.

Please remove the URLs from your post and try again.

flickr.com/photos/
johnbrennanlive/8332850544/in/photostream[/img]
 01/01/2013 05:54:43 AM · #21
This is the Flickr link.
 01/01/2013 06:50:02 AM · #22
Referring to the shot you posted on flickr (commenting as if it were shot for commercial purposes):

A good candid shot with perfect focus, appealing DOF and crop. Face lacks a bit of contrast due to backlighting. White balance should be a bit warmer. Lint on the shirt should have been cloned out. A tad too much noise, especially visible in the background.
I wouldn't call it lifeless, but it could pop more; maybe a warmer skin tone and emphasizing the wrinkles would help.
The description sounds like it was written for stock (not perfectly, though) - bad news is, you won't be able to sell this image as you probably don't have a model release.

HTH
O.
 01/01/2013 02:28:53 PM · #23
You might look at this book. The short answer, though, is that the amount of processing depends on the type of shoot, but you have to have command of all three factors (equipment, shooting, processing).

As far as your shot, the shot itself is fine, although I'm not sure I'd shoot something at ISO 1250 for stock, even with my full frame D800. The two biggest issues are that the white balance is off and you need to do some levels adjustments.

note to self: googling "skin book" brings up some...ummm...interesting results.

01/01/2013 02:45:13 PM · #24
If you are considering stock, the crop is also a problem. Better to provide them with the entire head and allow them to crop to their specs. As for the editing, I agree with what's been posted so far. More disturbing to me than the darkness is the grayish, greenish tinge to the skin tones.
 01/02/2013 05:12:43 AM · #25
Guys,

You are absolutely amazing, I just love those comments they will help me immensely. h2 your comments were well noted, great feedback. With regard to the model release form, I will be able to get one. At this point I don't know the subject but I can find out easily enough.

And a question with regard to that: If I have already posted it on Flickr can I still at a later date submit it for sale?

Tanguera, with regard to cropping, are you suggesting that I give them a bit around the edges at the time of shoot. In this picture I shot it how I thought it should be framed. With stock photography, is there format guidelines that I need to follow, you know the old 8x10 as an example or can I just crop as I see fit?

Ann, thank you for your tip and I will have a look at the book.

Once again, thank you all for being so generous with your time in addressing my concerns.

Kind Regards
John Brennan

I failed to mention by name previous posts offering advice, but rest assured I have taken all posts on board.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 07/29/2025 03:38:34 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/29/2025 03:38:34 PM EDT.