| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/07/2012 02:12:38 AM · #1 |
| I think the challenge is keeping the errors down to just ONE thing. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 02:19:24 AM · #2 |
| Just one GLARING thing wrong. Good. That means I can have my usual complement of other wrong things, as long as they're not as glaring as the glaring one :) |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 08:35:31 AM · #3 |
| So many errors.... so little time... |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 08:50:46 AM · #4 |
Is the general consensus that one "technical thing" needs to be wrong, or is it something wrong going on "in" the picture, like a person on a ladder with no rungs, or the like?
not that there needs to be a general consensus, but, just thinking. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 10:12:47 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by blindjustice:
Is the general consensus that one "technical thing" needs to be wrong, or is it something wrong going on "in" the picture, like a person on a ladder with no rungs, or the like?
not that there needs to be a general consensus, but, just thinking. |
Funny how the conversation got down the track of "technicals" right away. I don't think the challenge or the description says anything about photographic technicals being wrong, though I suppose it could be interpreted that way. I would much raher see a good photo with something wrong in it, such as a portrait of a baseball pitcher tossing a football, or something along the lines as  blindjustice stated. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 10:14:36 AM · #6 |
Got my idea. Who can say they've never made an honest mistake?
Message edited by author 2012-09-07 10:15:09. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 11:21:42 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by ancientimages:
So many errors.... so little time... |
exactly |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 11:30:34 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by blindjustice:
Is the general consensus that one "technical thing" needs to be wrong, or is it something wrong going on "in" the picture, like a person on a ladder with no rungs, or the like?
not that there needs to be a general consensus, but, just thinking. |
My initial thought is something out of place not technical. That is the angle I will be using but I wouldn't vote down anyone for either interpretation. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 12:01:08 PM · #9 |
This one is definately up to interpretation
|
|
|
|
09/07/2012 12:05:13 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by MinsoPhoto:
Originally posted by blindjustice:
Is the general consensus that one "technical thing" needs to be wrong, or is it something wrong going on "in" the picture, like a person on a ladder with no rungs, or the like?
not that there needs to be a general consensus, but, just thinking. |
My initial thought is something out of place not technical. That is the angle I will be using but I wouldn't vote down anyone for either interpretation. |
Thats kind of what I thought. I am, for the record, not a "strict constructionalist" a loose DNMC'er. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 08:00:15 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by MinsoPhoto:
Originally posted by blindjustice:
Is the general consensus that one "technical thing" needs to be wrong, or is it something wrong going on "in" the picture, like a person on a ladder with no rungs, or the like?
not that there needs to be a general consensus, but, just thinking. |
My initial thought is something out of place not technical. That is the angle I will be using but I wouldn't vote down anyone for either interpretation. |
so.... not much different from the recently completed "Stranger in a strange land"(?)... i up for goofy photos! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/31/2025 04:48:29 AM EDT.
