| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/03/2012 10:32:36 AM · #1 |
Your source photograph may be old or new, as long as it was shot with a digital camera and not already entered in a challenge.
Is using Archive images something that has happened here before? IMHO this takes the 'challenge' out of shooting with a deadline. |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 10:37:42 AM · #2 |
| We've done it a couple times before. It's rare. It makes sense in this challenge sense baby animals tend to have specific seasons... |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 10:39:19 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by Ecce_Signum:
Is using Archive images something that has happened here before? IMHO this takes the 'challenge' out of shooting with a deadline. |
I agree with you, but once in a while can be ok :) |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 10:41:06 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by Ecce_Signum:
Your source photograph may be old or new, as long as it was shot with a digital camera and not already entered in a challenge.
Is using Archive images something that has happened here before? IMHO this takes the 'challenge' out of shooting with a deadline. |
It is very rare for challenges to not have a specific shooting timeline, but it has happened before. Specifically, the first Baby Animals challenge from August 2010 had the same rule set and lack of specific time constraints, as well as Hidden Gems challenge from May 2010. |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 10:42:20 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Ecce_Signum:
Your source photograph may be old or new, as long as it was shot with a digital camera and not already entered in a challenge.
Is using Archive images something that has happened here before? IMHO this takes the 'challenge' out of shooting with a deadline. |
The first Baby Animals had the same rule set. As for the challenge of shooting with a deadline....well, it might be 1) Pet is now no longer a baby 2) High difficulty finding a baby animal in the wild 3) High difficulty in finding a baby animal in captivity (remember zookeepers will keep the baby out of the public eye until they are old enough - unless they are very large like hippos or elephants). |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 10:45:06 AM · #6 |
| I must admit I am pleased by this variant of the rules as I have taken some nice shots recently of some baby animals though I imagine if everyone can choose from their entire back catalogue there are going to be some fantastic entries. |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 10:53:58 AM · #7 |
| This is awesome, if i had not seen this thread I would have missed it completely, looks like I can enter something :) |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 11:43:03 AM · #8 |
wonder how i'll get voted if i put a pic of my kid.
humans are animals.... |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 11:45:42 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by RyanWareham:
wonder how i'll get voted if i put a pic of my kid.
humans are animals.... |
Go for it. let us know how the voters respond.... |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 11:53:01 AM · #10 |
so that's what the flag means? how does the ordinary jane know that?
nice. I have some old babies lying around somewhere... |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 11:56:13 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by tnun:
so that's what the flag means? how does the ordinary jane know that?
nice. I have some old babies lying around somewhere... |
The flag just means there are extra rules for the challenge. Click on any challenge with a flag and it will give you the details on what extra rules are applied to the challenge. |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 11:59:00 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by tnun:
so that's what the flag means? how does the ordinary jane know that?
|
when you click on the link to read the description, right next the the flag it says EXTRA RULES in red. |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 12:18:49 PM · #13 |
thank you. I clicked on everything else but the challenge TITLE (advanced rules, flag (duh), the rest of the description).
some days..... |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 12:58:36 PM · #14 |
If nothing else this thread has helped a couple of people understand the rules when submitting so that's nice :)
Don't think I'll enter and looking forward to above average entries from all who do :) |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 08:47:18 PM · #15 |
yeah! i had a shot i was thinking if using for July FS but decided against it. now i have a legit use for it here at DPC.
-m |
|
|
|
08/03/2012 11:56:49 PM · #16 |
GOSH I SO WISHED I WAS WELL ENOUGH GO OUT AND SHOOT SASHA BUT I KNOW IT IS IMPOSSIBLE BUT I JUST WISH THINGS WERE DIFFERENT... NEVER MIND I WILL ENJOY VOTING AND COMMENTING AS MUCH AS I CAN RE THAT MY HEALTH ALLOWS SO GET OUT THERE AND SHOOT ALL THE BABY ANIMALS ONE CAN SEE AND ENTER THEM FOR ME TO VOTE ONE AND COMMENT OF AS MANY AS I CAN... LOOKING FORWARD TO HIS ONE XOX
I AM NOW AT DOVE COTTAGE AND WILL STILL BE HERE FOR ANOTHER WEEK AND A FEW DAYS... PETER IS IN MELBOURNE FOR THE BOYS OUR TWO ADULT SONS WHO WILL BE 30 AND 40 NEXT WEEK 10 YEARS AND ONE DAY APART... SASHA CAME UP TO SEE ME TODAY HERE AT DOVE COTTAGE AND I GOT TEARS IN MY EYES BUT IT WAS LOVELY TO SEE HER AS I MISS HER A LOT...BYE FOR NOW AND GO TAKE SOME AWESOME PET IMAGE FOR ME TO SEE XOX FROM SHEZ
|
|
|
|
08/04/2012 12:55:48 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by sherpet:
GOSH I SO WISHED I WAS WELL ENOUGH GO OUT AND SHOOT SASHA BUT I KNOW IT IS IMPOSSIBLE BUT I JUST WISH THINGS WERE DIFFERENT... NEVER MIND I WILL ENJOY VOTING AND COMMENTING AS MUCH AS I CAN RE THAT MY HEALTH ALLOWS SO GET OUT THERE AND SHOOT ALL THE BABY ANIMALS ONE CAN SEE AND ENTER THEM FOR ME TO VOTE ONE AND COMMENT OF AS MANY AS I CAN... LOOKING FORWARD TO HIS ONE XOX
I AM NOW AT DOVE COTTAGE AND WILL STILL BE HERE FOR ANOTHER WEEK AND A FEW DAYS... PETER IS IN MELBOURNE FOR THE BOYS OUR TWO ADULT SONS WHO WILL BE 30 AND 40 NEXT WEEK 10 YEARS AND ONE DAY APART... SASHA CAME UP TO SEE ME TODAY HERE AT DOVE COTTAGE AND I GOT TEARS IN MY EYES BUT IT WAS LOVELY TO SEE HER AS I MISS HER A LOT...BYE FOR NOW AND GO TAKE SOME AWESOME PET IMAGE FOR ME TO SEE XOX FROM SHEZ |
SHEZ- YOU CAN ENTER OLD PHOTOS IN THIS ONE IF YOU WANT TO. THERE'S NO NEED TO GO GET NEW PHOTOS - JOIN IN IF YOU WANT! :)
-CB |
|
|
|
08/05/2012 07:32:37 PM · #18 |
Here's the deal:
New developments in RAW processing software and associated plug-ins has opened the door for better presentations of "older" images captured in RAW. While I really like DPC because it encourages me to go out and photograph fresh images, it's okay to occasionally look back and reprocess the digital "film negative" archived RAW images with new and improved software. Very interesting experience! Thanks, DPC!!!! |
|
|
|
08/06/2012 11:19:55 PM · #19 |
Oh man I just noticed this, but how old can the photo be does not stipulate?
Message edited by author 2012-08-06 23:20:10. |
|
|
|
08/06/2012 11:46:59 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by Neat:
Oh man I just noticed this, but how old can the photo be does not stipulate? |
The only requirement is that it be taken directly with a digital camera, which pretty much makes it have to be within the last 20 years or so. |
|
|
|
08/07/2012 12:09:36 AM · #21 |
had a lot of fun with this, going back to one of the first times i tried to control DoF in camera with the little shoot i did.
it's amazing that i was able to find a good one in the bunch given my apparent crap-tacular photos from a few years back, and there's definitely no way i could've done anything in the PP department aside from "one step fix" and assume it was all okay at the time either.
I'm eager to see if i get any comments on this one as i'm VERY pleased with the result! |
|
|
|
08/07/2012 01:54:49 AM · #22 |
| ok, I was about to enter this challenge, but the entering hoo ha still had that box to check that the photo had been taken withing the usual time frame, and not as specified in the flag listing. am I to understand that all 37 current entries were thusly recent, or that some entrants perjured themselves? is this a trap? do I qualify for paranoiaissimus? |
|
|
|
08/07/2012 02:04:52 AM · #23 |
| I dunno about the date thing on entry, but having looked through my archives, apparently I've not taken too many shots of baby animals in the digital age.... :( |
|
|
|
08/07/2012 04:42:20 AM · #24 |
| damn only just seen this bit haha, right better get the old external backup drives out :) |
|
|
|
08/07/2012 07:03:32 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by tnun:
ok, I was about to enter this challenge, but the entering hoo ha still had that box to check that the photo had been taken withing the usual time frame, and not as specified in the flag listing. am I to understand that all 37 current entries were thusly recent, or that some entrants perjured themselves? is this a trap? do I qualify for paranoiaissimus? |
I submit that my entry was based on photograph(s) taken with a digital camera on or between Aug. 3rd 2012 and Aug. 9th 2012. If requested, I will provide the unedited, original file from my digital camera within 48 hours. I have followed the Advanced Editing rule set, taking into account any extra rules listed above.*
Extra Rules: Your source photograph may be old or new, as long as it was shot with a digital camera and not already entered in a challenge.
Actually, this is not ambiguous. Not a trap. Entrants have not perjured themselves. It is a case, however, of needing to keep original files of potential challenge entries... even if several years old. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/02/2025 02:41:27 PM EDT.
