| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/19/2012 12:45:21 PM · #51 |
| I'm not the first to realize that there is little difference between "homage" and "fromage" |
|
|
|
07/19/2012 07:05:09 PM · #52 |
Originally posted by deeby:
I'm not the first to realize that there is little difference between "homage" and "fromage" |
LIKE |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 03:15:57 PM · #53 |
so, have we come to some consensus on image naming... include the original entry # in parentheses? name the image the same or similar to the original? it would be great if we were all sort of consistent, yes?
-mef |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 03:30:43 PM · #54 |
Originally posted by mefnj:
it would be great if we were all sort of consistent, yes? |
Dream on... |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 03:40:20 PM · #55 |
| it would be hilarious if the ribbon winners were all doing their own shots |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 03:43:30 PM · #56 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by mefnj:
it would be great if we were all sort of consistent, yes? |
Dream on... |
oh, can't a guy hope & dream? ;-) |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 03:45:18 PM · #57 |
Originally posted by Venser:
Originally posted by mike_311:
i have no issue with the content, however that image really isn't very appealing to me. higher production value would have helped although yes, with the vulgar content im not sure how much, at least one would have been able to justify a high score, which i wouldn't have in its current form.
dont take it the wrong way but looks like something i would enter just to enter. you say you went out of your way to shoot a decently composed photo but honestly it doesn't show. |
Fair enough. I guess I was simply irate because photos without any actual birds in them, real or metaphorical, finished higher.
There's been 277,374 entries to challenges and I find it hard to believe mine really warrants to be the 34th worst photo of all time |
I'm a bit jealous... I tried to score low a few times, TRIED! to score low.... none of my images are even close to the bottom 1000. |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 04:51:48 PM · #58 |
Originally posted by mefnj:
so, have we come to some consensus on image naming... include the original entry # in parentheses? name the image the same or similar to the original? it would be great if we were all sort of consistent, yes?
-mef |
Just add the original image id to the title and you get a +1 from me :) |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 05:04:55 PM · #59 |
| Btw. Since many photographers of the bottom 1000 aren't very active here any more, perhaps it's a good idea to send them a PM when you made a remake of one of their photos. |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 05:15:40 PM · #60 |
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by Venser:
Originally posted by mike_311:
i have no issue with the content, however that image really isn't very appealing to me. higher production value would have helped although yes, with the vulgar content im not sure how much, at least one would have been able to justify a high score, which i wouldn't have in its current form.
dont take it the wrong way but looks like something i would enter just to enter. you say you went out of your way to shoot a decently composed photo but honestly it doesn't show. |
Fair enough. I guess I was simply irate because photos without any actual birds in them, real or metaphorical, finished higher.
There's been 277,374 entries to challenges and I find it hard to believe mine really warrants to be the 34th worst photo of all time |
I'm a bit jealous... I tried to score low a few times, TRIED! to score low.... none of my images are even close to the bottom 1000. |
I'll have to show you the ropes, I'll be there again once the current round of challenges are over.
|
|
|
|
07/21/2012 05:40:00 PM · #61 |
Originally posted by hajeka:
Originally posted by mefnj:
so, have we come to some consensus on image naming... include the original entry # in parentheses? name the image the same or similar to the original? it would be great if we were all sort of consistent, yes?
-mef |
Just add the original image id to the title and you get a +1 from me :) |
speaking of this, is there a way to go to a specific photo on the site based on the ID number? i tried entering it in the photo search page, but nothing come up. i know i can paste a link to a site thumbnail, but it would be nice if during this challenge we could type in the image ID and see the original photo (providing everyone lists it in the title).
-m |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 05:49:58 PM · #62 |
Originally posted by mefnj:
Originally posted by hajeka:
Originally posted by mefnj:
so, have we come to some consensus on image naming... include the original entry # in parentheses? name the image the same or similar to the original? it would be great if we were all sort of consistent, yes?
-mef |
Just add the original image id to the title and you get a +1 from me :) |
speaking of this, is there a way to go to a specific photo on the site based on the ID number? i tried entering it in the photo search page, but nothing come up. i know i can paste a link to a site thumbnail, but it would be nice if during this challenge we could type in the image ID and see the original photo (providing everyone lists it in the title).
-m |
Just open another image, and replace the numbers at the end with the new numbers (in the URL bar) |
|
|
|
07/21/2012 06:13:49 PM · #63 |
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by mefnj:
Originally posted by hajeka:
Originally posted by mefnj:
so, have we come to some consensus on image naming... include the original entry # in parentheses? name the image the same or similar to the original? it would be great if we were all sort of consistent, yes?
-mef |
Just add the original image id to the title and you get a +1 from me :) |
speaking of this, is there a way to go to a specific photo on the site based on the ID number? i tried entering it in the photo search page, but nothing come up. i know i can paste a link to a site thumbnail, but it would be nice if during this challenge we could type in the image ID and see the original photo (providing everyone lists it in the title).
-m |
Just open another image, and replace the numbers at the end with the new numbers (in the URL bar) |
well, yeah, i guess that would work... it just seems odd that the Search page doesn't work by image ID # |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 01:37:01 AM · #64 |
Originally posted by hajeka:
Btw. Since many photographers of the bottom 1000 aren't very active here any more, perhaps it's a good idea to send them a PM when you made a remake of one of their photos. |
OK, send one to me. |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 09:41:11 AM · #65 |
| Im confused.. can we also use the image's title as an inspiration? |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 12:04:02 PM · #66 |
| I'm taking this as: look at the bottom 1000, pick one of the photos, shoot it better. Does not have to relate to the original challenge. Also it's a free study because I'm not looking up each original. |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 12:04:23 PM · #67 |
| I'm taking this as: look at the bottom 1000, pick one of the photos, shoot it better. Does not have to relate to the original challenge. Also it's a free study because I'm not looking up each original. |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 12:06:00 PM · #68 |
Originally posted by klkitchens:
I'm taking this as: look at the bottom 1000, pick one of the photos, shoot it better. Does not have to relate to the original challenge. Also it's a free study because I'm not looking up each original. |
That's also my take on it. |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 02:02:25 PM · #69 |
Originally posted by jagar:
Originally posted by klkitchens:
I'm taking this as: look at the bottom 1000, pick one of the photos, shoot it better. Does not have to relate to the original challenge. Also it's a free study because I'm not looking up each original. |
That's also my take on it. |
That's my take as well, but I am giving bonuses for those who include the original imageid, and have at least some sort of solid connection to the original. |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 02:31:57 PM · #70 |
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by jagar:
Originally posted by klkitchens:
I'm taking this as: look at the bottom 1000, pick one of the photos, shoot it better. Does not have to relate to the original challenge. Also it's a free study because I'm not looking up each original. |
That's also my take on it. |
That's my take as well, but I am giving bonuses for those who include the original imageid, and have at least some sort of solid connection to the original. |
This is what I had in mind when I proposed the idea. A large portion of the voting points relates to the comparison. |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 04:20:11 PM · #71 |
Originally posted by EntertainMe:
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by jagar:
Originally posted by klkitchens:
I'm taking this as: look at the bottom 1000, pick one of the photos, shoot it better. Does not have to relate to the original challenge. Also it's a free study because I'm not looking up each original. |
That's also my take on it. |
That's my take as well, but I am giving bonuses for those who include the original imageid, and have at least some sort of solid connection to the original. |
This is what I had in mind when I proposed the idea. A large portion of the voting points relates to the comparison. |
Yup -- I'm hoping people include the original in the title somehow. I think that's the fun of these challenges (like the double take). I had fun looking up the original. :)
Now if we get 250 entries, I'll probably not bother. :)
|
|
|
|
07/22/2012 05:30:58 PM · #72 |
| Well I certainly hope there's more than 43 |
|
|
|
07/22/2012 10:26:16 PM · #73 |
Message edited by author 2012-07-24 16:23:22. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/16/2025 02:18:09 AM EDT.
