Author | Thread |
|
08/13/2004 05:38:34 PM · #76 |
I don't think they are ignoring you. I saw the pic, and it was in "dried form" as you put it. It was not some plant growing in the ground, it had already been harvested. |
|
|
08/13/2004 05:42:32 PM · #77 |
Originally posted by aKiwi: The plant in question is also called Hemp. This is used for a number of products ranging from clothing to oil, flour and much much more. None of which have anything to do with getting high!! Therefore I see absolutley no difference to the comparison between a popyseed bread roll and a picture of a poppy, or a picture of a Hemp plant and Hemp t-shirt and a Hemp plant! |
The difference is that posession of a poppyseed bread roll is not illegal in Virginia.
-Terry
|
|
|
08/13/2004 05:45:21 PM · #78 |
Originally posted by Spanish_Grease: I see SC decided to ignore this comment. Cannabis Sativa (the name of the plant from which marijuana is produced) is used all over the world for a wide variety of pratical needs. In many countries it is a staple industry that provides thousands of people with jobs, and supplies many more with basic needs; like clothing and food.
Marijuana is only marijuana, and is only classified as an illegal DRUG, when it is in it's dried form. I see nothing about illegal plants in the site rules. Yes, it is against the law to grow Cannabis Sativa in the US, but no where in the site rules does it say it a user is not allowed to enter a picture of a illegal plant, it only states an illegal drug.
Cannabis Sativa has many very close kin and subspecies, most of which are identical in appearance, and some of which contain no THC whatsoever. To say that because this plant looks like Cannabis Sativa and dq it for such a statement should mean that any picture of a mushroom should also be disqualified. Their are 57 different types of mushrooms that are commonly used for the same purposes as marijuana. They range a number of different species of mushrooms, and all look quite different. I'll even bet that some of the pictures of mushrooms taken on this site contain psilocybin (the drug contained within magic mushrooms). If labuda's picture was disqualified for looking like Cannabis Sativa then I expect every picture of a mushroom to be disqualified as well for looking like one of the 57 types of psilocybin mushrooms.
Lee
PS - Also, the chance of a Cannabis Sativa being grown in Montreal, out of doors, is very slim. Cannabis Sativa requires very specific conditions to grow, and unless someone was nurturing it very dutifully, then there is a very small chance Cannabis Sativa would survive. |
It was in its dried form. The image was not of a leaf but of a dried marijuana bud.
That the photograph was of marijuana in its dried form is not the slightest bit in question.
-Terry
|
|
|
08/13/2004 05:50:39 PM · #79 |
Originally posted by aKiwi: The plant in question is also called Hemp. This is used for a number of products ranging from clothing to oil, flour and much much more. None of which have anything to do with getting high!! Therefore I see absolutley no difference to the comparison between a popyseed bread roll and a picture of a poppy, or a picture of a Hemp plant and Hemp t-shirt and a Hemp plant! |
I doubt a picture would get a DQ for showing a shirt made from hemp, or hemp rope. Hemp is not made from the bud. While I find nothing wrong with the picture, and thought is was well done, it does go against the rules here, and I knew it would be DQ'd.
And if you want to use that logic, than any pictures of grapes, or wheat needs to be DQ'd be cause it can be turned into alcohol. |
|
|
08/14/2004 12:10:34 AM · #80 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
It was in its dried form. The image was not of a leaf but of a dried marijuana bud.
That the photograph was of marijuana in its dried form is not the slightest bit in question.
-Terry |
Aaaaaah, well then screw everything I said, Labuda, you are the weakest link....
Ahem, Ahem, cough cough, thats all from me.
Lee
|
|
|
08/15/2004 09:56:09 AM · #81 |
Maybe next time you can just buy it lol. |
|
|
08/15/2004 10:58:43 AM · #82 |
check out 62nd place in the chocolate challenge. 282 grams of ....that is not chocolate. I sent a private message saying that I tried to sniff the screen. |
|
|
08/15/2004 11:26:15 AM · #83 |
Originally posted by grainman9: check out 62nd place in the chocolate challenge. 282 grams of ....that is not chocolate. I sent a private message saying that I tried to sniff the screen. |
(sigh...) and I gave it a 10 for great chocolate photography. WWIT! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/22/2025 03:17:55 PM EDT.