New Close Up Filters - DPChallenge Forums

08/10/2004 01:47:25 AM · #1

Just got a cheap set of close up filters. Quantaray brand, came with a +1, +2, & +4 filter. Here's a pic I took with all 3 stacked together. Any tips on using these? Also wondering if it matters which order I stack them.

kyebosh

Canon EOS-20D

Canon EF 80-200mm f/2.8L

08/10/2004 01:48:10 AM · #2

can you post similar shots with each and none pls? I'm looking at these :-)

Nikon AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR

08/10/2004 01:54:03 AM · #3

Links removed. Better examples below.

Not the greatest examples, need to find a subject that doesn't move to compare. I cropped all these pictures close to the lizard, and resized.

Message edited by author 2004-08-11 03:03:56.

Havok

08/10/2004 06:02:04 AM · #4

I was just looking into the quantaray close up filters awhile back. How much did you pay for them and would you recommend these filters?

jadin

Nikon D800

08/10/2004 06:03:51 AM · #5

Your friend is cute!

08/10/2004 11:08:42 AM · #6

Originally posted by Havok:

I was just looking into the quantaray close up filters awhile back. How much did you pay for them and would you recommend these filters?

I spent $27 at Wolf Camera. Haven't used them much yet to recomend. So far, I think if I had the $$ a macro lens would be my choice. But since I don't they are good for what they cost.

dsa157

Canon EOS-50D

08/10/2004 11:10:38 AM · #7

could you do another test without the cropping? I'd like to see the full frame differences with the filters applied. Take some simple shots of coins or something.

Thanks in advance.

Dave

wwwavenger

08/10/2004 11:17:54 AM · #8

I have a Quantaray +3, I'm very happy with the results, considering it's just a cheap close-up filter.

08/10/2004 11:28:07 AM · #9

Originally posted by dsa157:

could you do another test without the cropping? I'd like to see the full frame differences with the filters applied. Take some simple shots of coins or something.

Thanks in advance.

Dave

I might be able to this weekend. In order to do this right, I need a tripod so I can get each shot to be the same. Thinking about getting one Friday.

kyebosh

Canon EOS-20D

Canon EF 80-200mm f/2.8L

08/10/2004 04:31:36 PM · #10

Cool, thanks!

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM for Canon

08/11/2004 01:54:06 AM · #11

Here's a few comparisons for those who asked. All taken F2.8 shutter 1/25 about 4 inches from subject. No filter, +1, +2, +4, +6, +7

wimbello

Canon EOS-10D

08/11/2004 03:35:11 AM · #12

How about some combinations? I have +1, +2, +4, and with all 3, it's heaps closer.

how about a +7 & +4??

movieman

Canon EOS-300D Rebel

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM

08/11/2004 03:38:13 AM · #13

Originally posted by wimbello:

How about some combinations? I have +1, +2, +4, and with all 3, it's heaps closer.

how about a +7 & +4??

I think he only has +1, +2, and +4, so the photos of +6 and +7 were already stacked.

dsa157

Canon EOS-50D

08/11/2004 07:50:35 AM · #14

thanks for posting the comparisons, Matt. FYI - I ordered a set of Kenko extension tubes last week and they are coming in today. While more expensive than the closeup filters, they are cheaper than a macro lens, so I'll be interested in seeing how they stack up (pun intended).

I'll try to post some comparison shots as well.

Dave

08/11/2004 02:57:08 PM · #15

Cool, I'd like to see how the tubes work. Wish I could get them for my camera.

And yes the +6 & +7 photos were stacked.

dr rick

Canon EOS-300D Rebel

08/11/2004 05:05:57 PM · #16

I use Quantaray close up filters frequently. They work very well. The main problem I have with them is slight to or fro camera movement after I've locked focus; it doesn't take much to mess up the focus. (A tripod would avoid this, but isn't always feasible.) I suppose tubes or macro lenses would have the same problem; the DOF is just so small with macro photography.

Some examples:

Note that the rose is a miniature variety and is only an inch across.

dsa157

Canon EOS-50D