| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/27/2012 12:05:43 AM · #1 |
Part 1
Expert editing...
This could get interesting for sure!!! |
|
|
|
01/27/2012 12:36:35 AM · #2 |
| I am looking forward to voting on this one, it will be fun! |
|
|
|
01/27/2012 03:15:39 AM · #3 |
| Perfect way to use my brand new graphic tablet :) |
|
|
|
01/27/2012 09:36:29 PM · #4 |
I convinced my poor daughter (Who had an obsession with unicorns) that this was a unicorn I saw while I was in Afghanistan.
How I have tormented that child..... |
|
|
|
01/28/2012 07:12:35 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by sinistral_leo:
I convinced my poor daughter (Who had an obsession with unicorns) that this was a unicorn I saw while I was in Afghanistan.
How I have tormented that child..... |
Too funny. Time to break them out for the challenge. |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 02:34:30 PM · #6 |
I'm really looking forward to see what others come up with.
Finished taking all photos needed. Now for the REAL challenge...assembly. |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 02:39:28 PM · #7 |
| These intimidate me, so I'll probably just be one of those voters who really appreciates everyone's creativity. Keep 'em comin' folks. ;) |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 09:13:29 PM · #8 |
| just submitted. start getting that blue ready... |
|
|
|
01/30/2012 02:07:59 PM · #9 |
| This sounds like fun!! I am definitely in this one! |
|
|
|
01/30/2012 11:41:04 PM · #10 |
| so... what qualifies as a "texture" in expert editing? only stuff like zebra stripes or fish scales, or other things/patterns as well? |
|
|
|
01/31/2012 05:30:37 AM · #11 |
I'm a little disappointed that it's under expert editing, I get inspired at what people did with the first one. People had to use more of their imagination; now all they have to use is Photoshop. I hope to see imaginative people use traditional and non digital methods to pull this one off.
Ironically, Photoshop takes much of the magic out of it. |
|
|
|
01/31/2012 05:39:38 AM · #12 |
not even thought about this one yet or after party or free study entry :( been so busy with work... grrrr
thinking time... |
|
|
|
01/31/2012 05:57:46 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by MarioPierre:
I'm a little disappointed that it's under expert editing, I get inspired at what people did with the first one. People had to use more of their imagination; now all they have to use is Photoshop. I hope to see imaginative people use traditional and non digital methods to pull this one off.
Ironically, Photoshop takes much of the magic out of it. |
In my view that is the point of expert editing,to get folks to utilise software to the greatest extent learning new skills as they go. |
|
|
|
01/31/2012 08:09:39 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by Tiny:
Originally posted by MarioPierre:
I'm a little disappointed that it's under expert editing, I get inspired at what people did with the first one. People had to use more of their imagination; now all they have to use is Photoshop. I hope to see imaginative people use traditional and non digital methods to pull this one off.
Ironically, Photoshop takes much of the magic out of it. |
In my view that is the point of expert editing,to get folks to utilise software to the greatest extent learning new skills as they go. |
In the right hands, Photoshop is a great tool for butchering photos. ;) |
|
|
|
01/31/2012 08:52:47 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by Tiny:
Originally posted by MarioPierre:
I'm a little disappointed that it's under expert editing, I get inspired at what people did with the first one. People had to use more of their imagination; now all they have to use is Photoshop. I hope to see imaginative people use traditional and non digital methods to pull this one off.
Ironically, Photoshop takes much of the magic out of it. |
In my view that is the point of expert editing,to get folks to utilise software to the greatest extent learning new skills as they go. |
It is that....and can be quite frustrating when trying to get learn a new technique with new software...bah, went back to the old method until I can figure out how to effectively utilize Remask.
I'm beginning to feel like one of those cooks on those timed challenges on Food Network. May have bit off more than I can chew:-( |
|
|
|
01/31/2012 11:48:40 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by MarioPierre:
I'm a little disappointed that it's under expert editing, I get inspired at what people did with the first one. People had to use more of their imagination; now all they have to use is Photoshop. I hope to see imaginative people use traditional and non digital methods to pull this one off.
Ironically, Photoshop takes much of the magic out of it. |
+1 |
|
|
|
01/31/2012 12:01:28 PM · #17 |
Naw.
Even though I really don't know what I'm doing in expert editing (you should see the hatchet job I did last night!!!), I enjoy seeing what the masters can do. And Magic and Mystery is the type of thing made for photoshop. Our chance to live in a fairy tale and pretend we're taking the pictures there.
I tried putting seagull wings on my daughter last night. It was a truly awful attempt. I'm relegated to trying to do something with much simpler editing. But each time I try, I learn something more. I'm not interested in digital art. But playing with the expert editing has advanced my regular editing significantly.
After all, we had to go to the moon to invent Tang. Dream big!
|
|
|
|
02/02/2012 09:17:38 AM · #18 |
Never....
...........again..
....will I do...
..something this complex...
Too many hours poured into this and way too many layers that caused it to crash when merging a few layers (I had a back-up saved thank goodness).
It looks NOTHING like I envisioned and I am debating whether it is ready for the voters. |
|
|
|
02/02/2012 09:29:28 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by CNovack:
Never....
...........again..
....will I do...
..something this complex...
Too many hours poured into this and way too many layers that caused it to crash when merging a few layers (I had a back-up saved thank goodness).
It looks NOTHING like I envisioned and I am debating whether it is ready for the voters. |
I know what you mean -- but I always feel if I go through the trouble to shoot (and in this case edit) for a challenge, you might as well enter it anyway. Even if it's not good, you might as well get feedback. If you don't bother, you might always wonder how it would have gone over.
The only time I don't enter is if I want to save the idea for later. |
|
|
|
02/02/2012 09:32:39 AM · #20 |
| Mine is not very expert I'm afraid, i think i'm too impatient, anything over 20 minutes gets on my nerves. |
|
|
|
02/02/2012 09:48:48 AM · #21 |
Originally posted by jagar:
Mine is not very expert I'm afraid, i think i'm too impatient, anything over 20 minutes gets on my nerves. |
And if you take the blue I will congratulate you with a cake that has ...(counting my $@%#^ image) 30 layers. Don't know of any cake that can support that many layers so it will have to be image processed;-P |
|
|
|
02/02/2012 11:07:18 AM · #22 |
Sorry folks, but I get SO frustrated with these "I hate expert editing" threads. Lucky for you, THIS is the one where I'll rant :-)
Very simple things, such as spot cloning, when done a certain way, are illegal in advanced editing. This was the case of my DQ'd Great Dames. The image was mostly basic editing, except for a tiny piece of fur which I cloned from the cuff to the hem. Perfectly legal under Expert. Horrors, right? What a deplorable lack of imagination...
Then the argument about "unfair advantage" of those possessing better PS skills...
::rolls eyes::
Several recent expert challenges have been won by both advanced and BASIC editing. Which goes to prove that it's NOT the editing which makes an image win - it's the image itself.
And sorry, Mario, but I take exception to your observation that people had to use more of their imagination before PS. The amount of post-processing going into breathtaking images (you don't think Ansel Adams did anything to his images...???) has not really changed, only the tools to achieve the results. In addition, digital photography and editing software have opened up a universe of photographic possibilities not conceivable in the "good ol' days", bringing us wildly imaginative imagery.
Finally, going by DPC ruleset, half my images (not posted here) are "expert". Even so, I would venture that most of you would not be able to pick the ones that are. Just because you can doesn't mean you HAVE to use everything in the PS arsenal. And if you don't know how to use it, it's this a perfect opportunity to learn something? After al, isn't that what DPC is about in the first place???
[/rant] |
|
|
|
02/02/2012 11:35:23 AM · #23 |
im far from a ps expert infact my ps knowledge probably amounts to 3% of the actual functionality of the package but i love these expert challenges (note: i didnt at first before i embraced and had a go, i was a whining straight out of camera man, ohh how times change) ive really enjoyed the ones ive done and enjoyed thinking about planning the shots i needed and how they would fit together for this one etc.
i wont do well but like i say its been fun, ive learnt stuff and improved my ps skills so :)
|
|
|
|
02/02/2012 11:35:38 AM · #24 |
| I have entered this challenge. Meets the challenge in my mind, but that may mean it totally misses with the voters. Didn't need any expert editing, but I don't begrudge others who want to use the allowed techniques. It's all okay. |
|
|
|
02/02/2012 11:36:29 AM · #25 |
| That's kinda what I was getting at with my post. Bad skills can ruin a not-too-bad-to-begin-with photo. Replacing a minor blemish with an off-colour smudge, let's say. I think it's interesting to have whack effects next to more conventional images in the same contest. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/02/2025 03:00:00 PM EDT.
