| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 12:45:59 PM · #1			 | 
		
		 
 
 This image got 34 5's...
 
 what are you people thinking??? that this is an average photo? How can you tell it even meets the challenge?
 
 I think way too many people have "5" as their lowest vote. You're wasting your voting range.
 
 AND... you're robbing me of my brown ribbon! That's right, 5-voters, I blame YOU!!! Now you must confess, why did you give this image a 5? 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 12:53:33 PM · #2			 | 
		
		| I gave you a 4... If that makes you feel better... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 12:53:33 PM · #3			 | 
		
		Hey, I didn't vote that challenge. Looks like close up of a femur to me.
 
 I was beginning to think you were selling out to mass appeal for a couple of challenges there. 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 12:54:32 PM · #4			 | 
		
		Originally posted by posthumous:  How can you tell it even meets the challenge? |   
 
 If it's any consolation half the blue ribbon winners don't seem to meet their challenge either. Voting is fickle and the popular vote doesn't always have much meaning. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 12:54:37 PM · #5			 | 
		
		Those silly 'bucket voters'
 
 I bet one of them was   ubique 
  
 
 :-) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 01:00:30 PM · #6			 | 
		
		| How refreshing!  A rant about NOT getting low scores :-) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 01:03:18 PM · #7			 | 
		
		| You have to earn your browns ..... ;-) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 01:03:44 PM · #8			 | 
		
		you weren't drunk enough when u submitted your pic, i on the other hand don't even remember submitting mine......
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 01:03:46 PM · #9			 | 
		
		Originally posted by posthumous:    
 
 This image got 34 5's...
 
 what are you people thinking??? that this is an average photo? How can you tell it even meets the challenge?
 
 I think way too many people have "5" as their lowest vote. You're wasting your voting range.
 
 AND... you're robbing me of my brown ribbon! That's right, 5-voters, I blame YOU!!! Now you must confess, why did you give this image a 5?  |   
 
 Completely agree, I've started using 1-4 MUCH more since all the whining about low scores, I feel it's important to use the full range. It's like only ever considering 2 parties at an election, no wait.... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 01:14:32 PM · #10			 | 
		
		Originally posted by posthumous:    
 
 This image got 34 5's...
 
 what are you people thinking??? that this is an average photo? How can you tell it even meets the challenge?
 
 I think way too many people have "5" as their lowest vote. You're wasting your voting range.
 
 AND... you're robbing me of my brown ribbon! That's right, 5-voters, I blame YOU!!! Now you must confess, why did you give this image a 5?  |   
 
 LOL...troublemaker!  I hope your puppy had a restful nap...;-) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 01:32:12 PM · #11			 | 
		
		sometimes when I find an entry suggestively lewd or even just bordering on tasteless I cannot bring myself to give it any vote at all.  how counterproductive is that? I shall answer for it I know in the great by and by which seems to be coming sooner than a rich man can sink himself on his yacht.
 
 crybaby. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 02:07:56 PM · #12			 | 
		
		 How could it NOT receive 5? As far as I know, the following rules apply:
 For having colour +9
 For being in a reasonably standard format +7
 For having a subject +8
 For not being sharp -25
 For being grainy -10
 For being at the start of the group of entries +16
 
 And the winner is ....... 5!
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 02:14:53 PM · #13			 | 
		
		I thought it was crap and was going to give it a 3. But then I thought maybe it was "artsy crap" and I was missing the profound hidden significance and bumped it to 5.
 
 Seems I don't know how to separate my crap from my art :) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 02:30:16 PM · #14			 | 
		
		| I thought that perhaps Stevie Wonder was playing with his camera again. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 02:32:17 PM · #15			 | 
		
		Originally posted by gcoulson:   I thought it was crap and was going to give it a 3. But then I thought maybe it was "artsy crap" and I was missing the profound hidden significance and bumped it to 5. |   
 
 I didn't get to step 2, and just gave it a 3, LOL.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 03:16:56 PM · #16			 | 
		
		Maybe John,   jmritz, can take you under his wing. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 03:19:26 PM · #17			 | 
		
		| to me there is great, good, average, bad and annoying. sometimes I have to to make room for bunch of annoyingly bad photos? ;) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 03:27:15 PM · #18			 | 
		
		Originally posted by gcoulson:   I thought it was crap and was going to give it a 3. But then I thought maybe it was "artsy crap" and I was missing the profound hidden significance and bumped it to 5.
 
 Seems I don't know how to separate my crap from my art :)  |   
 No, I think you got it right ... the "problem" is a title which gives it enough context to make it (barely) recognizable, qualifying it as "artsy crap;" I probably would have given it a 6. A totally irrelevant title like "Argyle" might have clued-in the voters that this was indeed targeted for the nether end of the standings, and any high votes would have had to be deliberate sabotage. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 03:37:41 PM · #19			 | 
		
		| it had a title?  I guess I wasn't paying attention.  pourquoi? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 03:45:34 PM · #20			 | 
		
		Originally posted by tnun:   it had a title?  I guess I wasn't paying attention.  pourquoi?  |   
 No, just Pour ... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 04:12:25 PM · #21			 | 
		
		Originally posted by GeneralE:   Originally posted by tnun:   it had a title?  I guess I wasn't paying attention.  pourquoi?  |   
 No, just Pour ...  |   
 Oh, I read it as "poor" (just kidding) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 04:55:44 PM · #22			 | 
		
		Originally posted by gcoulson:   I thought it was crap and was going to give it a 3. But then I thought maybe it was "artsy crap" and I was missing the profound hidden significance and bumped it to 5.
 
 Seems I don't know how to separate my crap from my art :)  |   
 
 Now, that's what I'm talking about. Don't be afraid to commit!!! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 04:59:36 PM · #23			 | 
		
		i think you may have been rightfully beat... see the real brown winner made it look like he actually trying to take a picture of wine!
 therefor it generated the extra bad votes... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 05:25:13 PM · #24			 | 
		
		| I gave you a five because I liked what I considered to be the 'nose'. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2011 05:26:21 PM · #25			 | 
		
		| merde, now 5 equals artsy crap. |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 10:50:46 AM EST.