Author | Thread |
|
09/22/2011 11:39:04 PM · #51 |
One wonders what the powers that be are waiting for. |
|
|
09/22/2011 11:40:08 PM · #52 |
Originally posted by Louis: One wonders what the powers that be are waiting for. |
+1??? oh well... |
|
|
09/22/2011 11:50:02 PM · #53 |
Let me think, what happens after 3 strikes? |
|
|
09/22/2011 11:56:40 PM · #54 |
Originally posted by BrennanOB: Let me think, what happens after 3 strikes? |
BigRoundChancellorJr....
Message edited by author 2011-09-22 23:56:55. |
|
|
09/23/2011 12:24:34 AM · #55 |
Originally posted by BrennanOB: Let me think, what happens after 3 strikes? |
Penalties
An entry will be disqualified when a majority of the Site Council finds that any of the rules above were not followed.
In order to discourage repeated disqualifications and abuse of the disqualification system, the following penalties will apply for repeat disqualifications:
*
1st DQ in last 25 submissions: No penalty
*
2nd DQ in last 25 submissions: 1 week suspension of submission privileges
*
3rd DQ in last 25 submissions: 2 week suspension of submission privileges
*
4th DQ in last 25 submissions: 4 week suspension of submission privileges and 3 months of required âpre-submissionâ of proof file.
Considering he has entered 5 challenges and only 3 results are showing...me guesses there are still two in voting...if they get DQéd he may be breaking a new record....I wonder what 5 DQ's will get him....hopefully a banning....as far as I am concerned he has more than earnt it!
Message edited by author 2011-09-23 00:26:06.
|
|
|
09/23/2011 01:10:15 AM · #56 |
you are all, most likely, giving him exactly what he wants |
|
|
09/23/2011 01:16:11 AM · #57 |
Originally posted by smardaz: you are all, most likely, giving him exactly what he wants |
I genuinely almost wish I had thought of this... |
|
|
09/23/2011 01:35:25 AM · #58 |
Originally posted by Cory: I genuinely almost wish I had thought of this... |
I have a feeling your's would be more clever that this one. The idea is good, but the execution and stealing whatever images are at hand with no integration at all are pretty pathetic.
Message edited by author 2011-09-23 01:35:48. |
|
|
09/23/2011 01:41:26 AM · #59 |
Originally posted by BrennanOB: Originally posted by Cory: I genuinely almost wish I had thought of this... |
I have a feeling your's would be more clever that this one. The idea is good, but the execution and stealing whatever images are at hand with no integration at all are pretty pathetic. |
Awwww... Thanks! :) LOL! |
|
|
09/23/2011 01:52:31 AM · #60 |
Originally posted by BrennanOB: Let me think, what happens after 3 strikes? |
 |
|
|
09/23/2011 06:57:35 AM · #61 |
I think your reactions are much more hilarious than chanco himself, the sheer mirth this guy has injected into the site makes for great viewing.
Lighten up anti chancos, your showing your age. |
|
|
09/23/2011 07:30:16 AM · #62 |
Originally posted by mbrutus2009: Originally posted by BrennanOB: Let me think, what happens after 3 strikes? |
BigRoundChancellorJr.... |
SmallRoundChancellor |
|
|
09/23/2011 07:44:35 AM · #63 |
Originally posted by JamesA: I think your reactions are much more hilarious than chanco himself, the sheer mirth this guy has injected into the site makes for great viewing.
Lighten up anti chancos, your showing your age. |
I agree wholeheartedly!
Until I saw this attached to the potato shot:
"This image is not in the Public Domain.
In order to comply with the license this image is released under, any reproduction of this image, in any medium, must appear with a copy of, or full (hyperlinked) URL of the GFDL license. In addition, attribution of this image to "Fir0002/Flagstaffotos" is required and you are required to release the image (or any subsequent derivatives of it) under the GFDL. No other conditions may be added to, or removed from this license without the permission of the author and copyright holder. If you require a less restrictive commercial license please email me to negotiate terms."
Unless he is the owner of the shot, I think that stealing a shot goes too far. Too many of the photographers here are trying to deal with this issue. It's not funny anymore.
|
|
|
09/23/2011 08:06:54 AM · #64 |
I must say, I have to apologise. I wasn't aware that using images found online would cause such a strong reaction on here. I will only be entering photographs into challenges that I have taken myself from this point forward (well actually from last week forward).
I hope I haven't offended anybody too much.
Cheers, Chansooooooo |
|
|
09/23/2011 08:17:49 AM · #65 |
Originally posted by Big_Round_Chancellor: I must say, I have to apologise. I wasn't aware that using images found online would cause such a strong reaction on here. I will only be entering photographs into challenges that I have taken myself from this point forward (well actually from last week forward).
I hope I haven't offended anybody too much.
Cheers, Chansooooooo |
Your submission must be:
taken with a digital camera that records EXIF data.
a JPEG (.jpg) file.
no larger than 300 KB (307,200 bytes).
at least 160 pixels, and no more than 800 pixels on each side.
taken after the challenge is announced and before the deadline, based on the Current Server Time (US Eastern Standard/Daylight Time) displayed at the bottom of every page on this site.
taken and post-processed by you. Someone else may press the shutter button if you set up the shot and the camera settings. No one else may post-process your entry for you. Exceptions must be approved by the Site Council in advance.
|
|
|
09/23/2011 08:45:58 AM · #66 |
Originally posted by smardaz: you are all, most likely, giving him exactly what he wants |
I was thinking this as well. His reason for being here is to stir the pot and get attention, which he has done quite effectively.
|
|
|
09/23/2011 09:54:56 AM · #67 |
Originally posted by smardaz: you are all, most likely, giving him exactly what he wants |
That's why my initial reply to his suggestion to get involved with his project was as simple as follows:
Originally posted by yakatme: no |
I did, however, decide to elaborate after his sarcastic response.
Message edited by author 2011-09-23 09:56:04. |
|
|
09/25/2011 02:59:26 PM · #68 |
Hey fellas. Just checking in to let you all know that I've recently applied for a new job. How do you think I managed? I'll be honest, I'm a bit nervous.
 |
|
|
10/04/2011 06:33:36 PM · #69 |
|
|
10/04/2011 07:20:49 PM · #70 |
Originally posted by Big_Round_Chancellor: R.I.P Chanso :'( |
? |
|
|
10/04/2011 07:29:32 PM · #71 |
Originally posted by Big_Round_Chancellor: R.I.P Chanso :'( |
Originally posted by Big_Round_Chancellor: Cheer up Sunshine. |
Thanks for playing DPC. Bye bye. |
|
|
10/04/2011 07:35:15 PM · #72 |
You think this a game? This is srs business |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/18/2025 12:17:20 PM EDT.