Author | Thread |
|
07/23/2002 12:02:32 PM · #26 |
oooh I like sticky! good pic!
Originally posted by karmat: Just to throw another variable into the equation. Even if it is not wallpaper, and obviously has texture don't count on your picture being well received. The longer I'm here, the more I realize that though the people in the forums don't like flowers, babies, and pets, lol, "regular" people seem to. I knew I shoulda entered this or one of these. now to figure out how to take a picture of a baby, with a pet, in a flower garden to relate to Corporate World. :-)
|
|
|
07/23/2002 12:20:51 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by karmat: Just to throw another variable into the equation. Even if it is not wallpaper, and obviously has texture don't count on your picture being well received. The longer I'm here, the more I realize that though the people in the forums don't like flowers, babies, and pets, lol, "regular" people seem to.
While I can't really speak for everyone, I think the reason it seems none of us like the pets/kids/flowers shots is simply that so many of them really aren't all that good. There are a vast majority that are simply snapshots -- "Ahhhh isn't kitty pwecious?" kinds of things. Children and animal and flower shots have al done well here -- but they've also all had something more to them.
1st Place Flower Shot 2nd Place Child 3rd Place Pet
Those are just three examples that I was able to pull quickly. Other shots have also done very well without placing.
Personally, this is an all time favorite of mine:The Look
|
|
|
07/26/2002 02:52:44 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by martinwoods_uk: Hi everyone, I like a lot of the textures images this week, the only thing I found whilst voting was that quite a number of people had confused texture with form. There are some very structural images of buildings and close up views of flowers and insects/butterflies which whilst they are nice shots and have great colour seem to me to focus on the form of the subject rather than the texture. We all know that some of these objects have unusual texture if we could look close enough but to be rated highly this week I think we actually have to be able to determine the texture in the image. what do you think?
Hi again, I'm glad others see it the way I do (for a change) I didn't thimk it was enough for us to be able to imagine the texture in animage or even worse be told were to look by the title of the shot, personally I wouldn't have titles shown during voting, if the image doesn't say it then the title shouldn't be allowed to. I think this topic may have been taken onto a more specific level in the thread about deer antlers, I tried not to mention individual images in my original posting. Well done to you all anyway, when I am brave enough to submit a pic instead of just comments I will have more forum cred :-)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 07:07:39 AM EDT.