| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/14/2004 01:37:34 PM · #26 |
| That type of thinking is exactly the sort of thing we are trying to make "unattractive" by instituting a tangible penalty for being disqualified from a challenge. |
|
|
|
07/14/2004 01:59:08 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by EddyG:
One suggestion is to allow 1 "free" DQ per year (to cover honest mistakes) and then after that, penalties would increase (which would negatively affect your average score) for each additonal DQ'd photo. |
Why not just 1 free DQ period, instead of another free one every 12 months? |
|
|
|
07/14/2004 02:15:52 PM · #28 |
| I don't want to re-hash the whole SC discussion thread here, but several folks agree and think that is appropriate (1 "free" DQ and that's it), while others like the one/year thing. It is little details like that that make changes take time... =] |
|
|
|
07/14/2004 03:43:31 PM · #29 |
Doesn't is state "Not abiding by these rules may result in disqualification of your submission and possibly a suspension of your account" when you submit a photo?
Isn't suspension of your account a pretty serious penalty? Not that I think all DQ's should have their accounts suspended..but if the SC sees a pattern, I think it might warrant such action.
..edited to add last sentence
Message edited by author 2004-07-14 15:44:44. |
|
|
|
07/14/2004 11:07:46 PM · #30 |
Thanks to those that commented, and especially to taterbug and geewhy for picking the shot as a favorite. It makes me feel even more strongly that I did the right thing pulling the shot out!
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/08/2025 06:42:42 PM EDT.
