DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Current Challenge >> Puzzle Macro IV
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 31, (reverse)
AuthorThread
02/14/2011 12:30:48 PM · #1
Puzzle Macro

Puzzle Macro II

Puzzle Macro III
02/14/2011 12:40:45 PM · #2
Ahhh, my first DPChallenge revisited!! I'm ready now, I even own a macro lens this time around... ;)
02/14/2011 12:59:15 PM · #3
This is one of my favourite challenges. I like shooting macros and abstract macros and I love guessing what everyone elses photos are.
02/14/2011 02:42:57 PM · #4
These are always fun! Nobody had a clue what my entry in the last one was.
02/15/2011 02:55:47 PM · #5
interesting challenge...

now i'm going to put my extension tubes on my 200mm micro and i go to find out something to photograph! ;)
02/17/2011 10:51:58 AM · #6
Originally posted by GiorgioBaruffi:

interesting challenge...

now i'm going to put my extension tubes on my 200mm micro and i go to find out something to photograph! ;)


Should be great coming from you! :D
02/17/2011 11:05:50 AM · #7
I don't have a macro lens. I attempted some shots with my Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, but I can't really get close enough. Maybe I'll skip this one.
02/17/2011 11:09:15 AM · #8
Originally posted by markwiley:

I don't have a macro lens. I attempted some shots with my Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, but I can't really get close enough. Maybe I'll skip this one.


I don't think you really need a macro lens. Many of the images are things that are bigger taken close up. This was taken with a macro lens, but meat tenderizers are relatively big. You should be able to take the shot and then zoom in on a portion. You won't get as small of a DOF, but it would still work.


02/17/2011 11:18:23 AM · #9
Originally posted by markwiley:

I don't have a macro lens. I attempted some shots with my Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, but I can't really get close enough. Maybe I'll skip this one.


Try this Tutorial

02/17/2011 11:46:22 AM · #10
Originally posted by vawendy:

Originally posted by markwiley:

I don't have a macro lens. I attempted some shots with my Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, but I can't really get close enough. Maybe I'll skip this one.


I don't think you really need a macro lens. Many of the images are things that are bigger taken close up. This was taken with a macro lens, but meat tenderizers are relatively big. You should be able to take the shot and then zoom in on a portion. You won't get as small of a DOF, but it would still work.



it will also work with most lens if you have extension tubes...relatively low in cost...and they do an amazing job of getting up close....

I used an extension tube with this one
02/17/2011 11:47:13 AM · #11
Originally posted by Eagle40Fox2:

Originally posted by markwiley:

I don't have a macro lens. I attempted some shots with my Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, but I can't really get close enough. Maybe I'll skip this one.


Try this Tutorial


Just wanted to add that you don't even need the reverser ring. All my macro shots are just me reversing my lenses hand held. The focus is razor thin, but that has nothing to do with it being hand held. If anything I think I have more control that way. It takes some practice but you can get some nice results from it.
Example:
02/17/2011 11:49:39 AM · #12
Originally posted by Fiora:

Originally posted by Eagle40Fox2:

Originally posted by markwiley:

I don't have a macro lens. I attempted some shots with my Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, but I can't really get close enough. Maybe I'll skip this one.


Try this Tutorial


Just wanted to add that you don't even need the reverser ring. All my macro shots are just me reversing my lenses hand held. The focus is razor thin, but that has nothing to do with it being hand held. If anything I think I have more control that way. It takes some practice but you can get some nice results from it.
Example:


I keep wanting to try this...so you just turn around the lens and hand hold it?
02/17/2011 12:01:43 PM · #13
Originally posted by Ja-9:



I keep wanting to try this...so you just turn around the lens and hand hold it?


Yep! You just literally press the lens against the body, so that no light goes through from the sides.
And honestly, I have taken some shots where the lens wasn't quite alligned properly, and generally it just causes some white vignetting on whatever side wasn't alligned properly.
I do have to take several shots of a subject in order to get even 2 or 3 that are actually in focus. But that is the nature of the (cheap) beast.

*dreams* Someday I am getting the Canon 100m Macro. Sigh....

Message edited by author 2011-02-17 12:02:41.
02/17/2011 12:13:43 PM · #14
Originally posted by Fiora:

Originally posted by Ja-9:



I keep wanting to try this...so you just turn around the lens and hand hold it?


Yep! You just literally press the lens against the body, so that no light goes through from the sides.
And honestly, I have taken some shots where the lens wasn't quite alligned properly, and generally it just causes some white vignetting on whatever side wasn't alligned properly.
I do have to take several shots of a subject in order to get even 2 or 3 that are actually in focus. But that is the nature of the (cheap) beast.

*dreams* Someday I am getting the Canon 100m Macro. Sigh....


but aren't the "official reversing rings" kind of "cheep"??? I know the extension tubes weren't much
02/17/2011 12:58:58 PM · #15
Originally posted by Ja-9:



but aren't the "official reversing rings" kind of "cheep"??? I know the extension tubes weren't much


Anywhere from $7 - $50
02/17/2011 01:19:21 PM · #16
Originally posted by Eagle40Fox2:

Originally posted by Ja-9:



but aren't the "official reversing rings" kind of "cheep"??? I know the extension tubes weren't much


Anywhere from $7 - $50


hmmm found my next trick to add to my bag...lol
02/17/2011 01:28:22 PM · #17
Originally posted by Ja-9:

Originally posted by Eagle40Fox2:

Originally posted by Ja-9:



but aren't the "official reversing rings" kind of "cheep"??? I know the extension tubes weren't much


Anywhere from $7 - $50


hmmm found my next trick to add to my bag...lol


Yeah, reversing rings are awesome. The ones I got were definitely at the low end of that range (got em off eBay, I think). Very easy to set up, too. Highly recommended for anyone who wants to get a lot of bang for their buck.

Janine, I would expect you'd be able to hook up your 55mm macro with the 50mm reversed quite easily.
02/17/2011 03:24:15 PM · #18
It is probably too late for this challenge to get a reversing ring or extension tube on ebay. Are these things likely to be available at a local camera store?
02/17/2011 03:25:23 PM · #19
Originally posted by markwiley:

It is probably too late for this challenge to get a reversing ring or extension tube on ebay. Are these things likely to be available at a local camera store?


Tape, seriously... Just get the blue easy release painters tape and tape the hell outta them.
02/17/2011 03:44:18 PM · #20
Originally posted by markwiley:

It is probably too late for this challenge to get a reversing ring or extension tube on ebay. Are these things likely to be available at a local camera store?


chaaaaa ching....(vs. e-bay)
02/17/2011 04:08:19 PM · #21
Originally posted by Ja-9:

Originally posted by markwiley:

It is probably too late for this challenge to get a reversing ring or extension tube on ebay. Are these things likely to be available at a local camera store?


chaaaaa ching....(vs. e-bay)


Yes, I think my wallet can handle that. Thanks for all of the suggestions.
02/17/2011 04:37:16 PM · #22
I'm in - entry number 26
02/17/2011 06:24:16 PM · #23
maybe I will get a chance to enter something this wkend...but I'm going camping so my "bag of tricks" will be at home...I did some today and I will "polish" or "trash" them later on...lol
02/17/2011 06:34:48 PM · #24
I've actually got two completely different shots that I like, and am having a difficult time deciding whether to switch out the one I have entered for the other. If anyone wants to take a peek (and not vote later) then I can email links to both to you.

02/17/2011 08:32:27 PM · #25
Originally posted by ShutterPug:

I've actually got two completely different shots that I like, and am having a difficult time deciding whether to switch out the one I have entered for the other. If anyone wants to take a peek (and not vote later) then I can email links to both to you.


Send it on...I'll take a look
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/07/2025 02:47:58 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/07/2025 02:47:58 PM EDT.