|
| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/02/2011 08:16:21 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by questcouch:
Chromeydome, weâre sorry for your disappointment with the LumiQuest SoftBox. Itâs hard to address your issues very precisely, since you could be referring to any of four different models. However, the way light works still applies in all cases.
Whether you are bouncing or diffusing the light, the larger light source it produces, the softer the shadows. If the devices are roughly the same size, they will produce roughly the same (softer) shadows. This is the case whether it is a LumiQuest, Rogue, or for that matter, a paper plate. Beyond the size/softness issues, it is a matter of personal preference which other features you desire. Our light modifiers direct the light in very predictable directions; we obviously prefer this condition for complete creative control and predictability rather than the Rogue âInfinitely Variableâ approach, especially in unplanned or on-the-fly situations.
Regardless, as it says on the package, we stand behind all of our products, and if you write me, Quest@LumiQuest.com, weâll figure out a way to âmake it right.â
Quest |
Thank you for this unexpected reply!
I ordered 2 each of the Softbox III and the cinch strap, one for myself and one for a gift. I found it cumbersome to attach, it didn't stay on well (Nikon SB800 and SB600 speed lights), it ate a lot of light, and I didn't really see any substantial difference in the quality of the resulting shots (admittedly a subjective assessment). The gift recipient felt the same way (on a Nikon SB800). Of course this is water under the bridge, as this was from Christmas 2009. Likely I should have ordered the Promax instead, for better results and more versatility. But after the difficulty with the mounting/stability of the Softbox III, I was disinclined to gamble on the similar mounting system of the Promax. As I noted below, I have heard good things about the Promax style modifier, though, so was attempting to be clear that it was probably a viable option for the original poster.
I appreciate your contacting me via the forum. I suspect there is not much to be done, as I am not even sure I could find the softbox in order to return it, much less get a return unit from the giftee in another state. If you would like me to return it so you can check it to see if it had any defects, I will see if I can find it. But mainly this is just a case of "it didn't work well for my needs".
I agree that the Rogue is more variable, which can be a great positive or a great negative depending on the circumstances. I have found the variability to be more useful, without any real difficulties due to 'unpredictability' thus far. The overall bounce size is large, and my uses include the snoot and flagging capabilities it provides, as I sometimes mix my speed lights with my studio strobes in studio settings. It mounts easily, stays attached securely, and the resulting effect on the image is significant and easily noticed.
If I were running and gunning at events, weddings, etc., I can imagine that the Promax would be more suited to that, as a bump or wind would not alter the configuration as it might with the Rogue. I can't imagine (based on my one short experience) that the Softbox III would be suitable for a run/gun situation, as it was not very stable, came loose often, and was not easily installed again (and again). But I suspect that it is not designed for run/gun work. Since the original poster was seeking input with regard to an opera/ballroom event, I suggested considering either a Rogue or something like your Promax.
Again, thanks for your response: it says a lot about your company, in my opinion. If you need more information from me, please feel free to PM me here. I'll mail this post content to the address you provided as well, to close the loop. |
|
|
|
02/02/2011 08:23:17 PM · #27 |
And a note of thanks to  Bear_Music for PMing me about the post from LumiQuest here that I would have otherwise missed entirely. :-) |
|
|
|
02/15/2011 04:39:11 PM · #28 |
I got a Vivitar DF 383 - and it takes 4 AA batteries.
So here's the question (if anyone knows and would be so kind to answer):
I'm shooting a whole evening - about 5 hours - probably around 600 photos. Should I use rechargeable batteries or get alkaline one-use batteries?
In the manual, it says that one set of batteries is good for about 80 flashes. That's not a lot. Rechargeable batteries don't hold charge as well as disposable ones, so I fear they won't last even for the 80 flashes.
Any experience with that? Thank you!! |
|
|
|
02/15/2011 08:19:40 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by keenon:
I got a Vivitar DF 383 - and it takes 4 AA batteries.
So here's the question (if anyone knows and would be so kind to answer):
I'm shooting a whole evening - about 5 hours - probably around 600 photos. Should I use rechargeable batteries or get alkaline one-use batteries?
In the manual, it says that one set of batteries is good for about 80 flashes. That's not a lot. Rechargeable batteries don't hold charge as well as disposable ones, so I fear they won't last even for the 80 flashes.
Any experience with that? Thank you!! |
Is that 80 shots at full power? Regardless you should always have extra batteries. If you don't think you have enough batteries, then you don't . Bring extra..always
|
|
|
|
Current Server Time: 06/25/2025 10:32:39 PM  |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/25/2025 10:32:39 PM EDT.
|
