| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/03/2011 06:14:25 PM · #1 |
| Hi guys - just wanted to tap in to the infinite knowledge of the community once again. I'm looking at either the Canon 70-200 IS USM or the II model. It seems the II is about a thousand dollars more. Just looking for your take on if it is worth the extra grand? Let me know your thoughts, I appreciate it! |
|
|
|
01/03/2011 06:37:54 PM · #2 |
| I have the 70-200 2.8 IS version 1 and I find it to be an exceptional lens. I bought it from a guy that was upgrading the the newest model because of increased sharpness and better focusing. If you are into shooting sports professionally you may want to look at the newest model but if you are just starting out the original is a lot of bang for your buck. Just my own thoughts. |
|
|
|
01/03/2011 06:38:26 PM · #3 |
The "II" model is actually about $500 more expensive than the original IS version, and about $1000 more than the non-IS version. It might at this point be difficult to locate the original IS version, though I really don't know, I haven't tried. Do watch the reputation of retailers if you go trying to find one.
FWIW, I have the original IS version, and I will not be upgrading it, at least not any time soon. |
|
|
|
01/03/2011 06:46:02 PM · #4 |
| I have owned both and still own the mkII version. IMO the mkII is a lot sharper, better contrast, better IS and better focussing although many will not agree with that. |
|
|
|
01/03/2011 07:12:32 PM · #5 |
I own both and the II has a faster auto-focus and its minimum focus distance has improved over the first version. It has an improved IS system too which means sharper pictures when shot handheld. It is a tiny bit heavier and longer but that shouldn't be a show-stopper. It looks like the price difference is around $500 to $700 USD. I am comparing the II on B&H and what the used first version goes for on ebay, but if you can really get the I for $1,000 cheaper, then it is a tough decision. Just FWIW, Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM is my favorite lens of all time. I can take shots with that lens under low-light without flash that 70-200mm simply cannot deliver. If you need the 200mm zoom and that beautiful compression that it offers and are willing to pay the extra money to get the 2nd version, 70-200mm IS II is an exceptional lens.
Message edited by author 2011-01-03 19:21:16. |
|
|
|
01/03/2011 07:23:03 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by nightpixels:
I own both and the II has a faster auto-focus and its minimum focus distance has improved over the first version. It has an improved IS system too which means sharper pictures when shot handheld. It is a tiny bit heavier and longer but that shouldn't be a show-stopper. It looks like the price difference is around $500 to $700 USD. I am comparing the II on B&H and what the used first version goes for on ebay, but if you can really get the I for $1,000 cheaper, then it is a tough decision. Just FWIW, 85mm f/1.2 is my favorite lens of all time. I can take shots with that lens under low-light without flash that 70-200mm simply cannot deliver. If you need the 200mm zoom and that beautiful compression that it offers and are willing to pay the extra money to get the 2nd version, 70-200mm IS II is an exceptional lens. |
LOL, so the 85 f/1.2 is your favorite ehh?? Wouldn't know that from looking at your portfolio - five out of six of your top shots (and all of your top 3) are taken with the 16-35mm f/2.8L... Although the one with the 85 is awesome... |
|
|
|
01/03/2011 07:25:26 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by coryboehne:
Originally posted by nightpixels:
I own both and the II has a faster auto-focus and its minimum focus distance has improved over the first version. It has an improved IS system too which means sharper pictures when shot handheld. It is a tiny bit heavier and longer but that shouldn't be a show-stopper. It looks like the price difference is around $500 to $700 USD. I am comparing the II on B&H and what the used first version goes for on ebay, but if you can really get the I for $1,000 cheaper, then it is a tough decision. Just FWIW, 85mm f/1.2 is my favorite lens of all time. I can take shots with that lens under low-light without flash that 70-200mm simply cannot deliver. If you need the 200mm zoom and that beautiful compression that it offers and are willing to pay the extra money to get the 2nd version, 70-200mm IS II is an exceptional lens. |
LOL, so the 85 f/1.2 is your favorite ehh?? Wouldn't know that from looking at your portfolio - five out of six of your top shots (and all of your top 3) are taken with the 16-35mm f/2.8L... Although the one with the 85 is awesome... |
I know, what was I thinking when I said that :) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/18/2025 10:16:21 AM EDT.
