Layers, upon layers of crappy votes

12/29/2010 10:25:52 AM · #26

I can hear the voices of "KILL... KILL... KILL..." when voters vote :-\

12/29/2010 10:54:47 AM · #27

Dropping now, but I know there must be more of the appreciative voters out there. If not, I'll be in the low 5's by this evening.

Votes: 33
Views: 54
Avg Vote: 6.1515
Comments: 2

12/29/2010 11:00:33 AM · #28

Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

Dropping now, but I know there must be more of the appreciative voters out there. If not, I'll be in the low 5's by this evening.

Votes: 33
Views: 54
Avg Vote: 6.1515
Comments: 2

If you go to low 5s.... that means I am going to swim in a pool of 4s

12/29/2010 11:38:30 AM · #29

6.11 now.

12/29/2010 11:41:45 AM · #30

Originally posted by FocusPoint:

If you go to low 5s.... that means I am going to swim in a pool of 4s

Down to 6.08. How's the water, Leo?

12/29/2010 11:43:20 AM · #31

Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

Originally posted by FocusPoint:
If you go to low 5s.... that means I am going to swim in a pool of 4s

Down to 6.08. How's the water, Leo?

Stinky... I think the whole DPC sewer goes down there :P

12/29/2010 11:48:53 AM · #32

Yuck. I should pick up some goggles on the way down.

12/29/2010 11:51:57 AM · #33

I don't get it at all. I haven't had a sub 5 shot since June and no way this should be below a 5. It makes no sense whatsoever.

Votes: 30
Views: 54
Avg Vote: 4.7333
Comments: 1

12/29/2010 11:55:22 AM · #34

Originally posted by jminso:

I don't get it at all. I haven't had a sub 5 shot since June and no way this should be below a 5. It makes no sense whatsoever.

Just a round of low voters coming through at the same time is what I think. I'm sure there is something in common that low and high votes often come clustered together.

12/29/2010 11:59:54 AM · #35

Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

Originally posted by jminso:
I don't get it at all. I haven't had a sub 5 shot since June and no way this should be below a 5. It makes no sense whatsoever.

Just a round of low voters coming through at the same time is what I think. I'm sure there is something in common that low and high votes often come clustered together.

The only problem is my score is up .5 since this morning so it is not looking good.

12/29/2010 12:30:17 PM · #36

Votes: 37
Views: 70
Avg Vote: 5.7027
Comments: 2
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0

Actually, this is what I had in my mind for the image. It started with 7.5 and I was like "NAAAAH, it ain't gonna happen!". I have high expectations for the Free Study though (WHAMMOOO... I see it coming)

12/29/2010 12:38:16 PM · #37

Well, I was on the way up again, and then someone dropped a 2 on me. I'll attribute it to someone who is punishing me for a subject choice they dislike. Barely holding onto that 6 now.

Olympus 17mm f/1.8 M.Zuiko

12/29/2010 12:43:16 PM · #38

Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

...someone dropped a 2 on me...

Yeap... "getting closer the the bottom" syndrome ... #2s around, of all kinds!

PennyStreet

Olympus OM-D E-M1

12/29/2010 12:55:38 PM · #39

Originally posted by PennyStreet:

goodness gracious me...

it's a sinking ship... happy new year.

colorcarnival

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Olympus 45mm f/1.8 M.Zuiko Digital

12/29/2010 02:00:17 PM · #40

Someone enticed the voters with the thread title. Crappy all the way today!

Votes: 42
Views: 78
Avg Vote: 5.6905
Comments: 1

12/29/2010 02:08:16 PM · #41

6.0000 now.

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

12/29/2010 02:16:20 PM · #42

Another comment and it appears as though people are viewing mine as DNMC... Wow how literal do we need to go on these challenges. At a 4.5750 gonna be my worst score in 6 months.

Abra

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

12/29/2010 03:35:11 PM · #43

50 votes and 6.1600 so I'm still smiling

MargaretNet

Sony DSC-RX100 VII

12/29/2010 04:04:08 PM · #44

Mine appears to be DNMC. I guess I should have included detailed description in the title! 4.9375

fotomann_forever

12/29/2010 04:09:31 PM · #45

Originally posted by marnet:

Mine appears to be DNMC. I guess I should have included detailed description in the title! 4.9375

Doesn't work... unfortunately.

12/29/2010 04:51:48 PM · #46

Originally posted by marnet:

Mine appears to be DNMC. I guess I should have included detailed description in the title! 4.9375

Mine is more DNMC then yours apparently, that or it just really sucks but I don't think it sucks that bad. You would think Layers would be very open to interpretation, sigh.