| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/22/2010 12:10:35 PM · #26 |
OK, that's interesting :-) Differences in the image from different sides of what the one lens projects... Learn something new every day. Thanks, Dave.
R. |
|
|
|
10/22/2010 12:37:25 PM · #27 |
I'm surprised that they haven't figured out a way to use the lens side of the shutter blades as a mirror, and eliminate the angled reflex mirror that has to bang up and shake the camera with every shot.
|
|
|
|
02/08/2011 10:55:55 PM · #28 |
If you folks haven't already seen it... DP Review hands on look at the prototype.
//www.dpreview.com/previews/fujifilmx100/ |
|
|
|
02/08/2011 11:28:09 PM · #29 |
| This looks like da bomb.....I wish it was a tad cheaper but ya know.... the USD will be sold by weight soon, so to be expected. On my wish list for sure..... |
|
|
|
02/09/2011 04:19:35 PM · #30 |
| Fuji website also updated today, final specs and more information, sample images and a short promotional video. Here. |
|
|
|
02/09/2011 04:25:25 PM · #31 |
| Ultimately a pretty expensive point and shoot. |
|
|
|
02/09/2011 04:38:27 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by Simms:
Ultimately a pretty expensive point and shoot. |
I'm probably different. But for me, my Canon 5Dm2 is my point and shoot since it's often left on "P" and autofocus. I point it and I shoot.
My rangefinder camera require me to focus manually and set aperture manually. It does not even allow me to "point and shot" if I wanted to. I love it :)
The fact that it does not have mechanical parts should IMO not automatically classify it as a P&S camera. Do you think the future is electronic or mechanical? I'm naiv enough to think it will be electronic ;)
Message edited by author 2011-02-09 16:42:05. |
|
|
|
02/09/2011 05:08:42 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by TrollMan:
Originally posted by Simms:
Ultimately a pretty expensive point and shoot. |
I'm probably different. But for me, my Canon 5Dm2 is my point and shoot since it's often left on "P" and autofocus. I point it and I shoot.
My rangefinder camera require me to focus manually and set aperture manually. It does not even allow me to "point and shot" if I wanted to. I love it :)
The fact that it does not have mechanical parts should IMO not automatically classify it as a P&S camera. Do you think the future is electronic or mechanical? I'm naiv enough to think it will be electronic ;) |
So you`re telling me it will be electronic apertures on the next-gen of SLR Lenses, not mechanical ones?
No? Thought so..
Look, I`d love a Leica if nothing more than for some bragging rights, but I was awed by the Fuji when it was announced, but now it just seems an expensive P&S - my opinion, probably wrong, but there ya go!
Message edited by author 2011-02-09 17:10:01. |
|
|
|
02/09/2011 05:31:30 PM · #34 |
I was actually referring to the mirrors :). I might of course be wrong, but it is what I think will happen - long term. If you; in the future, can go much smaller and lighter with equal or better quality than DSLR's and the price point is comparable... what would you choose?
But regardless, I have nothing against your opinion :) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/16/2025 03:57:53 AM EDT.
