| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/18/2004 01:22:17 AM · #1 |
I thought i let members know , using DPC's Tutorial on how to create printable images i was able to have great 8x10 print from my 1.92 , a40 canon camera
|
|
|
|
06/18/2004 04:17:00 AM · #2 |
A Quick Visual Guide To Resampling
The one Seltzer wrote was really good too.
I did all my old prints (up till the last 2) with a 1.92 Camera (Sony Digital Mavica FD-95), I would like to have printed an 8x10, but I wasn't gutsy enough to resize up to that point, so I stuck with 5x7. I may try it now though, expecially with my "Unexpected Invitation" shot.
|
|
|
|
06/19/2004 04:23:06 AM · #3 |
| Well i flirted with idea of making an 8x10 from a 1.92 megapixel for many months and used to make on 5x7 but finally i made an 8x10 i got great result |
|
|
|
06/19/2004 04:29:47 AM · #4 |
That's 1600 x 1200 no?
If so you should be able to print up to 16" x 12" without any problem. . . **edit** at least that's what I was able to get from that resolution at 100 dpi.
Message edited by author 2004-06-19 04:34:39. |
|
|
|
06/19/2004 04:33:30 AM · #5 |
| ya it was orginally 1600x1200, thank for your suggesttion will try size you suggested |
|
|
|
06/19/2004 05:38:28 AM · #6 |
Hey General, I sold that Olympus 2100... got an offer I couldn't refuse!
Anyways, I sold more 8x10 prints from that camera than any other camera I've ever owned, and it was only 2MP (1.92). You're right when saying that results can be wonderful from a lower megapixel camera, I never ever had a complaint.
Dave |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/24/2025 03:21:49 AM EDT.
