Author | Thread |
|
10/31/2004 01:12:44 PM · #1 |
Figured it out.
Message edited by author 2004-10-31 13:17:23. |
|
|
10/31/2004 01:17:37 PM · #2 |
Works for me.
EDITED TO ADD: When testing in the future, please use an existing test thread.
-Terry
Message edited by author 2004-10-31 13:18:10.
|
|
|
10/31/2004 01:35:43 PM · #3 |
Sorry about that. I will be mindful of that in the future.
I wanted some input on the angle chosen for the image found here.
This is day 2 of my infant POD.
Comments appreciated. |
|
|
10/31/2004 01:48:53 PM · #4 |
Carlos
IMO it looks a tad overexposed and if you look close at the original you can see a slight camera movement in the image, enough to cause a minor blur.
From what I can see it was 10:30am on 10-31, was it cloudy?
Did you adjust this in any software for exposure or etc?
I do not understand the movement giving what the EXIF data says:
Exposure time 0.001 s (1/2000)
Did you shoot this on a drive by?
|
|
|
10/31/2004 02:00:37 PM · #5 |
Thanks for the reply.
The sign is on a lawn nearby my home. It is a flimsy sign--noteworthy because it is a little windy today (BTW it was partly cloudy)and may have moved the sign upon capture. I run a script in PSP8 that "auto" does everything including the resizing. The results of that scripting process (I suspected this and is now confirmed by your comments) don't always give me the best results.
I appreciate your taking the time to comment on this image. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/14/2025 01:25:35 PM EDT.