Author | Thread |
|
10/23/2004 02:19:03 PM · #1 |
|
|
10/23/2004 02:22:20 PM · #2 |
well if you can afford it go for it i love your work
|
|
|
10/23/2004 02:25:45 PM · #3 |
Can't blame ya! Bought one on 09 September, already got a blue ribbon with it =) |
|
|
10/23/2004 03:12:11 PM · #4 |
You and me both brotha. Once I sell the 10D, those monies go to the new lens. |
|
|
10/23/2004 03:45:28 PM · #5 |
I wanna get a 2mm - 800mm 1.4 nikor wide angle narrow zoom macro telephoto lens.
Can you blame me?
:)
|
|
|
10/23/2004 03:55:27 PM · #6 |
Come to Mexico, Gringo, and you can buy that dream lens cheap. In Guadalajara last week had a guy offer one off the back of his Chebby pickup. |
|
|
10/23/2004 04:01:06 PM · #7 |
I'll be getting it for myself as part of my year end bonus. I wonder how long it will be before Santa makes an early visit? :)
edit: I told Alecia a while back that I wouldn't get another lens before Xmas, but for the record I insist that it was worded "I will not get another lens FOR MY 10D before Xmas". k?
Message edited by author 2004-10-23 16:02:32.
|
|
|
10/23/2004 04:37:51 PM · #8 |
Yeah, I want one too but there's this weird thing with my family; They like to eat on a regular basis. On top of that, my husband insists that we save money for retirement and our kid's college education. Go figure! |
|
|
10/23/2004 04:58:30 PM · #9 |
Way to go Jacko!!!! You'll love that lens! And it's a BIGGGG BADASS lens! It basically lives on my Mark II.
|
|
|
10/23/2004 05:04:43 PM · #10 |
OMG ... I actually forgot about the badass factor when considering this purchase. Should I get the lens hood too? Does that add any use/badass points?
Originally posted by doctornick: Way to go Jacko!!!! You'll love that lens! And it's a BIGGGG BADASS lens! It basically lives on my Mark II. |
|
|
|
10/23/2004 05:07:03 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Jacko: OMG ... I actually forgot about the badass factor when considering this purchase. Should I get the lens hood too? Does that add any use/badass points?
Originally posted by doctornick: Way to go Jacko!!!! You'll love that lens! And it's a BIGGGG BADASS lens! It basically lives on my Mark II. | |
The hood comes with the lens. Doubles the length of the lens! Even more badass!
|
|
|
10/23/2004 05:16:12 PM · #12 |
I'm there dood.
Originally posted by doctornick:
The hood comes with the lens. Doubles the length of the lens! Even more badass! |
|
|
|
10/23/2004 05:20:28 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Jacko: I'm there dood.
Originally posted by doctornick:
The hood comes with the lens. Doubles the length of the lens! Even more badass! | |
LOL Yeah and when UPS delivers it, your wife will say, "You're THERE dude!" THERE=doghouse
ruf ruff |
|
|
10/23/2004 05:39:11 PM · #14 |
For Jacko...

|
|
|
10/23/2004 06:03:26 PM · #15 |
... i'm tearing up
Originally posted by doctornick: For Jacko...
|
|
|
|
10/23/2004 07:25:50 PM · #16 |
This is how I get away with it
Originally posted by digistoune:
LOL Yeah and when UPS delivers it, your wife will say, "You're THERE dude!" THERE=doghouse
ruf ruff |
|
|
|
10/23/2004 08:07:08 PM · #17 |
Yup giving her pictures like this
can only help your cause! ;)
|
|
|
10/23/2004 08:28:20 PM · #18 |
Yup it sure is a sweet lens. It is a really nice range, wide but not so wide that you have to make special compositions to make use of it.... hope you dont have to wait too long. |
|
|
10/23/2004 08:32:26 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by Jacko: This is how I get away with it
Originally posted by digistoune:
LOL Yeah and when UPS delivers it, your wife will say, "You're THERE dude!" THERE=doghouse
ruf ruff | |
Well, I guess that'll do ;-) Hey, I remember you saying another bundle of joy was on the way... When is she due? (Congratulations again on that, by the way :-) |
|
|
10/23/2004 08:42:10 PM · #20 |
I'm gonna play contrarian here. It's a sweet lens but it's designed for a full-frame application. I have a 17-40 and I wouldn't like anything longer on the short end. The 24-70 is like 38mm on the wide end on a 1.6x crop. Yawn. I'm selling my 28-105 for this very reason. Not wide enough. The ultra-wide zooms are better on the 300D/10D/20D as general purpose zooms, IMHO. If I were looking for a 2.8 zoom as a general purpose lens it'd be the 16-35.
For a super sharp lens in that range I would rather get a 35 1.4L. Real low light capability and even better sharpness and contrast to compliment my 17-40. But that's just me.
|
|
|
10/23/2004 09:03:36 PM · #21 |
Here's a shot I took with the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Lens wide open at f/2.8 at ISO 1600, available light.

|
|
|
10/24/2004 12:12:46 AM · #22 |
I'm sure that's a great lens, it's an L after all. But isn't that the one where the Tamron rates almost as high for about a third the cost?
Canon EF 24-70 f2.8 L rates 4.16 on PhotoZone; 4.6 on FredMiranda; and 4.73 on photographyreview; sells for $1125 (after rebate) at B&H.
Tamron AF 28-75 f2.8 XR Di rates 4.14 on PhotoZone; 4.6 on FredMiranda; and 4.47 on photographyreview; sells for $370 at B&H.
The Tamron comes with a 6 year warranty from the manufacturer whereas the Canon has only a 1 year warranty. You can get an additional 7 years of coverage for the Canon by purchasing a Mack extened warranty for $35 at B&H.
You'll save again with the Tamron if you buy filters- it takes 67mm versus 77mm for the Canon.
Both have a lens hood included; the Canon includes a pouch that the Tamron doesn't. The Canon is an L but not a white one.
Unless that slightly lower focal length range is the reason you are buying, the Tamron desreves serious consideration. Is the prestige of L glass, and/or your brand loyalty, worth $800? |
|
|
10/24/2004 12:15:34 AM · #23 |
That's why I have a Sigma 15-30mm
Originally posted by jimmythefish: I'm gonna play contrarian here. It's a sweet lens but it's designed for a full-frame application. I have a 17-40 and I wouldn't like anything longer on the short end. The 24-70 is like 38mm on the wide end on a 1.6x crop. Yawn. I'm selling my 28-105 for this very reason. Not wide enough. The ultra-wide zooms are better on the 300D/10D/20D as general purpose zooms, IMHO. If I were looking for a 2.8 zoom as a general purpose lens it'd be the 16-35.
For a super sharp lens in that range I would rather get a 35 1.4L. Real low light capability and even better sharpness and contrast to compliment my 17-40. But that's just me. |
|
|
|
10/24/2004 12:23:53 AM · #24 |
Originally posted by coolhar: I'm sure that's a great lens, it's an L after all. But isn't that the one where the Tamron rates almost as high for about a third the cost?
Canon EF 24-70 f2.8 L rates 4.16 on PhotoZone; 4.6 on FredMiranda; and 4.73 on photographyreview; sells for $1125 (after rebate) at B&H.
Tamron AF 28-75 f2.8 XR Di rates 4.14 on PhotoZone; 4.6 on FredMiranda; and 4.47 on photographyreview; sells for $370 at B&H.
The Tamron comes with a 6 year warranty from the manufacturer whereas the Canon has only a 1 year warranty. You can get an additional 7 years of coverage for the Canon by purchasing a Mack extened warranty for $35 at B&H.
You'll save again with the Tamron if you buy filters- it takes 67mm versus 77mm for the Canon.
Both have a lens hood included; the Canon includes a pouch that the Tamron doesn't. The Canon is an L but not a white one.
Unless that slightly lower focal length range is the reason you are buying, the Tamron desreves serious consideration. Is the prestige of L glass, and/or your brand loyalty, worth $800? |
It is a damn nice lens! Hasn't left my 300D much sense I got it ;-) |
|
|
10/24/2004 04:09:50 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by Jacko: I'll be getting it for myself as part of my year end bonus. I wonder how long it will be before Santa makes an early visit? :)
edit: I told Alecia a while back that I wouldn't get another lens before Xmas, but for the record I insist that it was worded "I will not get another lens FOR MY 10D before Xmas". k? |
hm, still looking hard for that loophole are ya? ;) well, nice try, but a lens is a lens and the bet is still on! :)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 03:50:20 PM EDT.