DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Individual Photograph Discussion >> Photoshop or Filter?
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 29 of 29, (reverse)
AuthorThread
09/14/2004 05:23:30 AM · #26
Mind you, no one noticed that i removed 5 trees.
09/14/2004 08:05:24 AM · #27
Originally posted by jonpink:

Mind you, no one noticed that i removed 5 trees.


Now that's funny!
09/14/2004 08:31:45 AM · #28
Again, check out the article in Digital Photo Pro this month. I was part of the, "well I can do this in PS" school since I got my first digital. I've changed that opinion after seeing the difference between on camera filter and photoshop.

Keep in mind, every time you use PS, you are moving digital data around. The stronger the filter effect you seek, the more data you move in the image. Which makes sense when you think about. In the side by side image comparisions you can actually see a difference. Interestingly I noticed the diff the most when I made photocopies for my employees. The images altered in PS were not as smooth in black and white reproduction as the ones with filters. Again, non scientific test, your mileage might vary. :)

Do I have a full set of filters? Nope. But based on the article and some other things I've read online, I try to do as much alteration as possible before I go into the darkroom. That means correct color, correct exposure, and in focus shots. I've seen good evidence that I should not be without a polarizer, ND set, and possibly a couple of fun Cokin filters.

Am I running out today to get these filters? Nope. Cause right now I can get by in PS. But they are sure as heck on my list.

Clara
09/14/2004 09:02:42 AM · #29
Jon - just briefly - my original post was not a moan about PS effects per se but more about the Motion Blur filter itself.

This site prided itself on not being like other sites which feature heavily images of digital art. I actually think DPC is now ever closer to all those other sites after relaxing the editing rules. Motion blur and FX filters can fool voters into thinking it's a photographic achievement when in actual fact it's the filter or FX that give the photo its appeal. For DPChallenge where people vote on 'photos' not 'digital art' I think it's somewhat misleading at times.

So really my viewpoint is that I like authenticity - real wood rather than veneer! In a sense grad filters can add an artificial sense of mood that clearly was not present in a scene - so what's so impressive about that?

Incidentally, I like your picture from an eye candy perspective but obviously the sky didn't look like that in reality and I'm conscious of that fact. Sometimes images make me much too conscious of it - others are sensitively treated to enhance rather than change the essence of the shot.

But I stress that this is my personal preference and I'm already aware that it's a less popular view!! ; )
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 07:36:55 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 07:36:55 PM EDT.