| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 01:48:34 PM · #1			 | 
		
		| I'm looking for a 67mm polarizer for a Canon 70-200mm f/4L (leaning toward the Hoya Super Multi-Coated). Does it matter that it's intended for wide-angle lenses? Anything else I should know or consider? What about about Tiffen? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 01:51:52 PM · #2			 | 
		
		Originally posted by scalvert:   I'm looking for a 67mm polarizer for a Canon 70-200mm f/4L (leaning toward the Hoya Super Multi-Coated). Does it matter that it's intended for wide-angle lenses? Anything else I should know or consider? What about about Tiffen?  |   
 
 you can use 'live help' at wolfcamera.com. They could probably answer that.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 01:55:15 PM · #3			 | 
		
		| Isn't THIS live help? I was hoping for specific advice from the local hardware honchos. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 02:00:05 PM · #4			 | 
		
		Originally posted by scalvert:   Isn't THIS live help? I was hoping for specific advice from the local hardware honchos.  |   
 
 hoya is top of the line. Tiffen ain't bad but the ones I have bought in the past have had minor imprefections. Cokin is pretty good as well.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 02:02:51 PM · #5			 | 
		
		Originally posted by scalvert:  Does it matter that it's intended for wide-angle lenses?  |   
 
 If it's intended for wide-angles, that just means that it's a "slim" filter - which, besides the slightly higher costs (if at all), should be completely irrelevant for your purposes. I'd say go for the Hoya, so far I only had good experiences with their filters. They're the best value for the money, IMHO.
 
 Edit: stupid typo ...
  Message edited by author 2004-09-07 14:32:22.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 02:07:09 PM · #6			 | 
		
		| That's all I wanted to hear. Thanks! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 02:13:17 PM · #7			 | 
		
		While Hoya is a decent brand, it's certainly not a filter for 'discriminating' photographers. On a high quality lens (like the one you're using) I would choose B+W or Heliopan.   
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 02:33:51 PM · #8			 | 
		
		Actually, even with my 16-35mm lens, I don't need a thin cut filter since the 10D is not full frame. If this was a film SLR then it would make a difference. At least other DPC folks and the people at The Filter Connection have told me this. But the thin cut filters were a good deal so I bought them anyway. The service from The Filter Connection (//www.2filter.com) is amazing and I highly recommend them to anyone. But their website seems to be down at the moment.
 
 Hoya filters are very good and match the Japanese optics better than B+W or Heliopan (which are German) from what I've read. Maybe I'm totally off on that but I do like my Hoya filters very much with my Canon lenses.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/07/2004 04:05:31 PM · #9			 | 
		
		Originally posted by zeuszen:   While Hoya is a decent brand, it's certainly not a filter for 'discriminating' photographers. On a high quality lens (like the one you're using) I would choose B+W or Heliopan.  |   
 
 I have a B+W UV filter on my G2.  It was a very nice filter.  (Was, only because now my G2 is broken and I doubt I'll need another 49 mm filter!)
  Message edited by author 2004-09-07 16:05:57. |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/03/2025 10:38:47 PM EST.