| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/31/2004 05:23:26 AM · #51 |
If they are selling that kit as suitable for LCDs when it isn't I'd return it and buy one of the sets that IS suitable for LCDs. I'm sure that all the recent versions of ColorVision software I looked at ARE suitable for use with LCD monitors.
|
|
|
|
08/31/2004 08:50:22 AM · #52 |
Originally posted by Gordon:
Originally posted by PerezDesignGroup:
I had tried the Spyder, but it was unable to calibrate my Dell 5100 Laptop LCD's gamma correctly. It did calibrate my Dell 19" 1901fp LCD standalone monitor at home just fine. I found the Spyder with Photocal lacking in features. I would definitely dish out the extra money for the Spyder with Optical in hindsight. Or better yet, go with the more professional Gretag Macbeth EyeOne if you have the money. Good luck! |
Just curious, what features did you find that photocal was lacking, that you needed to use ? Are you looking for features for a professional environment, or typical hobby usage ? |
Sorry Gordon, I just saw this. Here's my complete review of the Spyder.
//www.epinions.com/content_144714993284
It pretty much sums up my experience.
Message edited by author 2004-08-31 08:50:44.
|
|
|
|
08/31/2004 08:54:23 AM · #53 |
Hi Kavey! I'm afraid maybe I wasn't clear... the OptixXR IS suitable for LCDs. My problem is that, according to tech support, the extra control that the software offers is useless to me because I have an LCD.
And yes, I know... the CRT is better for critical color work. But I have bad eyeballs and the LCD doesn't cause as much strain so the compromise is worth it. |
|
|
|
08/31/2004 08:59:29 AM · #54 |
Originally posted by Kavey:
If they are selling that kit as suitable for LCDs when it isn't I'd return it and buy one of the sets that IS suitable for LCDs. I'm sure that all the recent versions of ColorVision software I looked at ARE suitable for use with LCD monitors. |
The problem may not be with the calibration software, but with the LCD itself. A lot of LCD's just don't have the necessary electronics / controls to perform a proper calibration, even if the calibration device is capable of measuring the light output from the LCD. There is a difference between a $250 17" LCD and a $500 17" LCD... and is the primary reason why CRTs still reign supreme for photo editing unless you can afford a high-end LCD that has the proper controls and electronics to individually adjust individual R-G-B gain, bias, gamma, etc.
By way of comparison, you can get a highly-regarded 19" LaCie Electron Blue CRT for well under $400, and the huge 22" version for under $700... and it will blow away almost any LCD out there in terms of color accuracy... |
|
|
|
08/31/2004 09:05:11 AM · #55 |
Originally posted by digistoune:
But I have bad eyeballs and the LCD doesn't cause as much strain so the compromise is worth it. |
I think you might be surprised how sharp, clear and fatigue-free a high-quality CRT can be when set up properly (i.e. high resolution, high refresh rate, etc.) |
|
|
|
08/31/2004 09:14:06 AM · #56 |
Hmmm... well I don't think another monitor is in my future. Only have so much $$$ and that tree in the backyard just isn't sprouting cash like it used to! :-P
So... should I return the Monaco thingie? |
|
|
|
02/12/2005 03:29:55 AM · #57 |
We need a tuturial with this information here... Gordon you are wise!
|
|
|
|
02/12/2005 03:37:04 AM · #58 |
I dont think this was mentioned...color management science
Message edited by author 2005-02-12 03:44:03. |
|
|
|
02/12/2005 03:39:07 AM · #59 |
|
|
|
02/12/2005 03:42:37 AM · #60 |
white balance
Message edited by author 2005-02-12 03:43:21. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 08:14:33 AM EDT.
