| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/07/2002 12:43:58 PM · #26 |
he bought a case of [PROPHYLACTICS]. how much more respectful can a guy get
* This message has been edited by the author on 6/7/2002 12:45:59 PM. |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 12:45:12 PM · #27 |
well, that's reasonable. i'm just saying that I, like you, don't like bein' lumped. : )
Originally posted by clay:
im just saying that if i were this fellow who got voteraped, i would be truly pissed.
|
|
|
|
06/07/2002 12:46:29 PM · #28 |
hehe
i was always told it's not wise to throw way money on things that will never get used
Originally posted by clay:
he bought a case of condoms. how much more respectful can a guy get
|
|
|
|
06/07/2002 12:48:00 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by jonathans:
Originally posted by KDJohnson:
[i]I''m just hoping my daughters never bring home anything like these guys.
[/i]but if you''re going to narc on free speech, dont expect the time of day.[/i]
Ditto |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 12:49:04 PM · #30 |
so, why should i be the same in person ? i may not be any more cheery but i dont insult people that i like conversing with - of which there are few, of course.
> he bought a case of [PROPHYLACTICS].
it was a box of 14 |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:02:27 PM · #31 |
Ditto
and im sure people my age talk to you willfully |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:04:54 PM · #32 |
well. all i can say is i'm sorry you guys feel so emotionally invested in all this stuff.
to me, all this discussion is pretty much academic, i.e. a fun way to pass the time while i'm waiting for renders and backups and such.
i believe that ultimately logic should govern all, and consistency is part of the same framework as logic. at some point in time, you had given the impression that you were also governed by rational conclusions. therefore, i would think you would like it pointed out that your behavior is inconsistent with your stated ideals.
i say all that i have said in the most objective, non-condemnatory way possible, with zero emotional involvement, although possibly a little bit of playful attitude ; ) |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:13:28 PM · #33 |
Forgive me..I'm PMSing and I'm out of drugs. I can kill legally right now but since I won't...all I have are these forums.
Have a beautious day :0) |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:28:44 PM · #34 |
I personally could care less if you use profanity in every other sentence. I don't like the name calling, which is what I deleted. Also, personal attacks are not allowed in the rules. Since I am what hokie calls a "hall monitor", I'm just doing my job.
That's the first time I have censored anyone and don't get the idea that I will do it all the time. I'm pretty tolerant as long as it doesn't get personal. |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:33:39 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by shortredneck:
As long as kids can come on this site, that type of profanity is not welcome.
. |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:34:29 PM · #36 |
| And your point being........? |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:35:15 PM · #37 |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:44:22 PM · #38 |
Oh no dear child, that is not true. I am very secure in all the love (lub?) I give and receive. In fact, I am sometimes quite fond of you and your buddies.
In reference to the original post, I agree that this photographer is good. I also think there are a lot of photographers on this site who haven't gotten the attention they deserve. That will change with time I believe. |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 01:47:31 PM · #39 |
| ha, yeah, they'll find someplace else to share their pictures |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 02:05:36 PM · #40 |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 02:30:30 PM · #41 |
It seems ridiculous to me to complain about an image "only" finishing in the top 20. The image in question is good, but so all are the other in the top 20. I personally would be very happy to finish that well.
Originally posted by clay:
i was looking through the past challenges last night when i came across a picture. it was a picture which i enjoyed when i saw it, and then it faded from my mind. most likely because it placed #20.
you [PERSONS OF FOWL ORIGIN] have ripped this guy off twice. the photo i was speaking of is here. the other was the spoon shot which i liked a little less. two amazing pictures: no placement, no recognition, and you have no concept of imagination.
although i was refused the fax number to one of the administrators place of business, my plan is still in action. when my manifest of hostile takeover is received and acknowledged, you will all be brutalized.
edit: youre right, proper for
|
|
|
|
06/07/2002 02:34:50 PM · #42 |
you havent placed in any challenges at all.
place 21st, then start complaining about why your picture was better than the one in 20th place. we'll have ourselves a hoe-down |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 02:46:13 PM · #43 |
I am in my first challenge right now, and I am sure that I will place in the bottom half for reasons I have already discussed to death.
It was not the artist complaining, it was one of his fans saying we "ripped him off". I just think that is silly. There are so many tastes and backgrounds here we cannot expect our personal favorite to win. BTW, mine this time is "Black and Chrome".
To me, a placement in the top 20% shows that the viewers thought the work was of high quality, and this is a tough group.
Originally posted by jonathans:
you havent placed in any challenges at all.
place 21st, then start complaining about why your picture was better than the one in 20th place. we'll have ourselves a hoe-down
|
|
|
|
06/07/2002 02:47:23 PM · #44 |
But she says you sold it to her
Originally posted by clay:
as long as parents dont pay attention to what their children are doing i can SAY FUCK ALL I WANT. its not my fault people cant control the might of a 9 year old. its also not my fault that your child smokes heroin
|
|
|
|
06/07/2002 02:54:52 PM · #45 |
| what it says to me is that people voted him down because he worded his title wrong. i can point out a few pictures from every challenge which are superior to ones ranked higher. then i can show you that the ones of higher rank only got their because of their subject |
|
|
|
06/07/2002 03:06:26 PM · #46 |
Originally posted by clay:
what it says to me is that people voted him down because he worded his title wrong. i can point out a few pictures from every challenge which are superior to ones ranked higher. then i can show you that the ones of higher rank only got their because of their subject
So says you :-)
I got pictures that I like every week that rank from first to the bottom. I think I'm right...you think you're right.
As I remember..I liked several of your photos even thought they didn't rank in the top 20 or so. Some would say I was wrong..some would say I was right.
|
|
|
|
06/07/2002 03:58:10 PM · #47 |
If you think your opinion is superior to everyone else's, why don't you start your own personal contest?
Originally posted by clay:
what it says to me is that people voted him down because he worded his title wrong. i can point out a few pictures from every challenge which are superior to ones ranked higher. then i can show you that the ones of higher rank only got their because of their subject
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/20/2025 11:49:18 PM EDT.
