DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> Dont' be so serious all the time....
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 27 of 27, (reverse)
AuthorThread
07/30/2004 06:38:07 PM · #26
Originally posted by doctornick:

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by Glen King:


1. Jam miniature marshmallows up your nose and sneeze them out. See how many you can do at a time.


Bad, bad, bad idea, it costs $75 to have the Dr. extract foreign objects when they get stuck up the nose. I know from experience.


It's free if you live in Canada. :D

No, it's not. It's paid for by everyone contributing to a common pool according to their ability to pay and their (possibly) their risk factors;
rather like insurance companies in fact without the stockholders to siphon off the profits or the ability to exclude high-risk members ("cherry-picking").

Why people insist on allowing profit-making insurance companies but oppose "socialized Medicine" -- run by the same methods but with the pool of clients all-inclusive, and the taxpayers as the "stockholders" to whom "management" is directly accountable every 2-6 years -- "on principle" is beyond me ... The government's highest mandate is to provide for the best interests of it's citizens, not its corporations and their stockholders.

We now return to your regularly-scheduled humor programming ...



Message edited by author 2004-07-30 18:39:33.
07/30/2004 06:43:03 PM · #27
Originally posted by GeneralE:

Originally posted by doctornick:

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by Glen King:


1. Jam miniature marshmallows up your nose and sneeze them out. See how many you can do at a time.


Bad, bad, bad idea, it costs $75 to have the Dr. extract foreign objects when they get stuck up the nose. I know from experience.


It's free if you live in Canada. :D

No, it's not. It's paid for by everyone contributing to a common pool according to their ability to pay and their (possibly) their risk factors;
rather like insurance companies in fact without the stockholders to siphon off the profits or the ability to exclude high-risk members ("cherry-picking").

Why people insist on allowing profit-making insurance companies but oppose "socialized Medicine" -- run by the same methods but with the pool of clients all-inclusive, and the taxpayers as the "stockholders" to whom "management" is directly accountable every 2-6 years -- "on principle" is beyond me ... The government's highest mandate is to provide for the best interests of it's citizens, not its corporations and their stockholders.

We now return to your regularly-scheduled humor programming ...


LOL you are actually right, we pay for it from our taxes. But NO one worries about needing that operation, no one goes bankrupt because they need to get a kidney transplant... :)
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/25/2025 03:16:28 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/25/2025 03:16:28 PM EDT.