| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/14/2004 02:24:30 PM · #1 |
Just wondering.
Mostly to figure a lens buying strategy that takes into account an eventual move from 1.6x through 1.3x to full frame. I've got the kit 18-55, the 50 f/1.4 and the 28-135IS. I've been thinking about the 17-40, but maybe a better long-term choice might be the 24-70. I realize there is a large price delta between the two.
Any long-term lens buying strategies out there?
|
|
|
|
07/14/2004 05:07:34 PM · #2 |
I understand that the 18-55 kit lense should *NOT* be used in anything by the 300D as it will damage and possibly be damaged by inserting it into other Canon Camera Bodies.
|
|
|
|
07/14/2004 05:41:19 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by BikeRacer:
Mostly to figure a lens buying strategy that takes into account an eventual move from 1.6x through 1.3x to full frame. I've got the kit 18-55, the 50 f/1.4 and the 28-135IS. I've been thinking about the 17-40, but maybe a better long-term choice might be the 24-70. I realize there is a large price delta between the two.
Any long-term lens buying strategies out there? |
As stated above, you'll be unable to use the EFS kit lens when you move to a camera like the 1D mkII (unless future models change in that respect). The best strategy for long run is to not buy low-end glass. From there you just start building your arsenal based on your needs. If you like shooting with primes, start buying them in the focal range you use most. If you like zooms, grab them. There really is no one route to go, everyone has their own tastes, opinions and shooting styles.
|
|
|
|
07/15/2004 02:20:16 AM · #4 |
I wasn't suggesting I wanted to use an EF-S lens with other cams. I was just wondering if it made any sense to buy an expensive superwide zoom if I expect to move to a different sensor over time. I was hoping some of the Mark II owners here could give some perspective on the difference between 1.6x and 1.3x shooting with their favorite lenses. Loss of reach, extra wide angle - has the new crop changed your lens selection?
|
|
|
|
07/15/2004 11:16:45 AM · #5 |
I wouldn't say it has changed my lens selection (I still want a really long zoom!) All of my lenses are just now "wider" and "shorter". So it is a (noticeable) benefit on the "wide" side (which is nice, because the wide-angle lens selection is somewhat limited, especially with a 1.6X crop factor) and just more expensive if you need that extra reach to get really long. A lot of birders (especially) have stuck with the 10D because of the 1.6X crop factor since it effectively makes their long lenses that much longer. Their 600mm lens is 960mm equivalent on the 10D, and only 780mm on the 1D -- almost 200mm difference, which is a lot for birding.
Personally, I think the 1.3X crop factor is a nice compromise, right in the middle of full-frame and the 1.6X crop factor. It still gives a little extra reach on the long side, and lets you get fairly wide on the short end. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/11/2025 03:50:39 PM EDT.
