DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Tips, Tricks, and Q&A >> Help needed on scanning
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 4 of 4, (reverse)
AuthorThread
06/17/2004 03:06:03 PM · #1
HI
I have some old Photographs with out any negative.
These Snaps are battered and need restoration.
I have a simple umax3600 Scanner in other words, bottom line scanner. It has 1200dpi.
I need to know following things-:

1) What steps I need to take to scan for making an 5x7 and 8x10 from them, I mean what kind settings.
2) How to restore battered part.

I have never scanned before , so would love to read about how to scan Photographs for creating printable and other related information about scanning.


06/17/2004 03:47:58 PM · #2
I would scan them in at around 300 DPI (1200 dpi will give you a 15 mb file or greater) this is an easy sie to work with and they scan in pretty quick.

restoration can be tricky, but once you get the hang of it it goes pretty quick. You can use the dust and scratch tool , clone tool and other tools as well to fix damaged photos.

this old photo my dad took of Chuck Yeager LONG ago, I had to restore about 30% of the image due to scratches and missing parts
Chuck -Repaired

it is a smaller sized version for the web and it does not look too well due to resizing, but the larger image is very nice.

I thought I had more samples on line of reapired images, but I dont.

James
06/17/2004 04:44:52 PM · #3
Originally posted by jab119:

I would scan them in at around 300 DPI (1200 dpi will give you a 15 mb file or greater) this is an easy sie to work with and they scan in pretty quick.

If you are trying to restore old archival photos, I highly recommend scanning them at the highest native resolution your scanner has (1200 dpi) and spend the time to work on the big file (actually, on a copy).

Every time I've worked on a lower-res version so it would be faster, I've later regretted not having the larger file to print, and been stuck having to do all the work over again. You might want to make a real low-res copy to try out tone/contrast adjustments and such, but for the retouching, I'd use the big file.

Another reason to edit the biggest possible file is that every element is then made up of more pixels, so you should have more detail to work with from the start. Try making the same scan at 300 dpi and at 72 dpi and look at them each at 100% magnification and compare!

I usually clone/paint the repairs onto one or more new layers, leaving the original data untouched. I've got one modified photo which ended up with about 18 pixel and adjustment layers, and is about 5 times the size of the final flattened (uncompressed) image. Save often.

If you don't have one, I can't recommend highly enough getting a tablet/stylus combo for this type of work -- even the smallest/cheapest one from Wacom (should be under $100) will make a huge difference in both the quality and efficiency of this task.
06/18/2004 01:19:54 AM · #4
thanks alot
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 06:46:19 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 06:46:19 PM EDT.