| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/24/2004 10:49:41 PM · #1 |
|
|
|
05/24/2004 11:11:26 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
05/24/2004 11:20:20 PM · #3 |
What does it look like before neatimage?
|
|
|
|
05/24/2004 11:34:41 PM · #4 |
it looks a little more noisier with a little bit more detail...
|
|
|
|
05/24/2004 11:36:53 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by theodor38:
it looks a little more noisier with a little bit more detail... |
Noise isnt always a bad thing!
|
|
|
|
05/24/2004 11:38:38 PM · #6 |
so you are saying i shouldnt have used the neatimage? i dont understand? it really didnt look good with the noise...
|
|
|
|
05/24/2004 11:54:47 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by theodor38:
so you are saying i shouldnt have used the neatimage? i dont understand? it really didnt look good with the noise... |
No, I was just curious to see a version that hadnt been neatimaged. It's a good abstract but it does have that very obviously neatimaged look to it.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 05:10:19 PM EDT.
