Author | Thread |
|
01/27/2014 07:50:37 AM · #1 |
im looking to downsize.
my 5d2 plus lenses is just too big to drag around. i want something smaller. im keeping the 5d2 but i want something that I can travel with and bring out and around.
i was thinking of a canon M but im sure i'll get frustrated with the AF. I'd prefer an ILC, i think...
requirements:
1. it must have an APS-C sensor or larger.
2. decent walk around zoom range for the FF equivalent of 24 to 70 or 100mm
3. good in low light (at least ISO 3200 with little noise) and/or at least be able to get a fast prime for it.
4. decent Autofocus speed and minimal shutter lag.
5. if i could mount my current lenses that would be a huge bonus.
6. easy to carry around or leave in my car.
7. weather proofing would be a bonus.
as i said im keeping my 5d2 for the heavy lifting when i need sharpness, speedlight control, etc. this is just something to bring along when i need to.
looking to hear what everyone suggests.
Message edited by author 2014-01-27 07:51:29. |
|
|
01/27/2014 08:34:21 AM · #2 |
No surprise I'm sure, but I'd recommend the Fuji X100s. |
|
|
01/27/2014 08:44:39 AM · #3 |
The Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ-200 is an awesome camera although it is probably smaller than what you are looking for. I mean, your wish list is a tough one. This camera is not a DSLR so you won't be getting any prime lenses for it. It does not do well at ISO3200 but most everything else that you want this camera has.
Message edited by author 2014-01-27 08:51:20. |
|
|
01/27/2014 08:53:26 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by Cory: No surprise I'm sure, but I'd recommend the Fuji X100s. |
I would second that in a heartbeat, I use my Fuji X100 all the time and my 20D/30D/7D see very little use these days and, no, I do not miss lugging them around.
Mike, I think you will struggle to come up with anything per your requirements. I see no point in looking for a smaller, more easily manageable camera then sticking a 17-40L on it.
I will stick with Fuji recommendations as I think they produce outstanding equipment.
Fujifilm X-S1 = Excellent bridge camera. Covers 24mm > 624mm range
Fuji X-Pro1. Quality camera if you want to go the interchangeable lens route
|
|
|
01/27/2014 12:49:00 PM · #5 |
im trying to figure out what i'm asking for doesn't exist as you guys are suggesting.
in a nutshell, more portable, takes great pics, and doesn't cost a fortune and wont drive me crazy trying to take pictures with it.
edit:
for instance the sony NEX models...
Message edited by author 2014-01-27 12:52:19. |
|
|
01/27/2014 12:52:32 PM · #6 |
This can be what you are searching for?
Sony A7 |
|
|
01/27/2014 12:57:53 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by Alexkc: This can be what you are searching for?
Sony A7 |
except for the price, yes. :) |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:03:52 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Mike: Originally posted by Alexkc: This can be what you are searching for?
Sony A7 |
except for the price, yes. :) |
Ok, but if you are selling part of your gear, you can get it ;) |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:22:51 PM · #9 |
i dont want to, but to be honest i might. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:26:43 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Mike: i dont want to, but to be honest i might. |
Never sell 135 f/2! |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:28:37 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Alexkc: Originally posted by Mike: i dont want to, but to be honest i might. |
Never sell 135 f/2! |
i know. i wish i used it more than i do. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:41:12 PM · #12 |
Sounds like you're looking for a Canon SL1. It uses the same processor and sensor as the Rebel T5i, but in an even smaller body. You can get a refurb from Canon for $499. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:42:45 PM · #13 |
i looked at that too, but i want even smaller.
im looking for a non DSLR.
|
|
|
01/27/2014 01:44:53 PM · #14 |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:45:25 PM · #15 |
In that case, Sony RX100 II. You'll have to give up noise performance or serious money to do better. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:47:02 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by Alexkc: Eos-M? |
i though about it, but using my lenses isn't a requirement and all the reviews i read suggest i could do better. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:48:17 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by scalvert: In that case, Sony RX100 II. You'll have to give up noise performance or serious money to do better. |
ohh, now that is impressive. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:54:44 PM · #18 |
i wonder how it compares with the older model. which is impressive in its own right. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:56:56 PM · #19 |
Fuji is announcing a new x mount camera and zoom tomorrow. Both will be weather sealed and you can use your existing EOS lenses with an adapter.
X-T1
adapters
Will be expensive though. |
|
|
01/27/2014 01:59:17 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by Olyuzi:
Will be expensive though. |
of course it will.. |
|
|
01/27/2014 02:02:47 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by Mike: i wonder how it compares with the older model. which is impressive in its own right. |
The new one has 40% better low light sensitivity, a hot shoe, flip out LCD monitor, external mic jack and slightly better battery life.
Message edited by author 2014-01-27 14:02:56. |
|
|
01/27/2014 02:09:37 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by scalvert: Originally posted by Mike: i wonder how it compares with the older model. which is impressive in its own right. |
The new one has 40% better low light sensitivity, a hot shoe, flip out LCD monitor, external mic jack and slightly better battery life. |
anyone want to buy a 135L...
lol |
|
|
01/27/2014 02:17:10 PM · #23 |
The original RX100 is no slouch, and Adorama has open box versions of both for a little less. |
|
|
01/27/2014 04:38:51 PM · #24 |
Doesn't the RX100 lack a viewfinder? I hate using the screens on the back -- half the time I can't see them in the bright sun. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 03:23:11 PM EDT.