| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/20/2013 09:00:41 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
And for landscape, it is true that there is right now no real compelling reason to be larger than APS-C, but that will change as 40+ MPx FF SLRs are released... and it will happen. Pixel count favors the larger sensor, for the same density. |
FF sensor cameras have some big advantages for landscapes, like higher DR (may even save you the time it takes to shoot bracketed exposures or combine them in HDR software), higher pixel counts for greater enlargements (smaller prints lack impact), and high ISO is an advantage as well (how often do you find scenes that are perfectly still?) especially true for low ISO shots where longer shutter speeds combined with wind blown foliage and water can ruin a shot. High ISO will allow you to stop down more and regain the DOF lost to APS-C. Plus, wide lenses will perform better with FF sensors. |
|
|
|
10/20/2013 10:23:25 AM · #27 |
Some pretty nice samples from Sony on the RX10 here:
//www.sony.jp/cyber-shot/rx/rx10/gallery/gallery.html#
in japanese but the ISO is readable below each one.
Bigger versions of some of these samples and some full size images here: //www.cameraegg.org/sony-a7-a7r-rx10-sample-images/
The RX7R images with the 55mm lens don't look so marvelous full size to me there. The RX7 with the 35 looks pretty good FS though.
Message edited by author 2013-10-20 10:29:18. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/24/2025 09:20:01 AM EDT.
