| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/05/2004 12:25:01 PM · #1 |
will genuine fractals give less noise when resampling? (compared to bicubic resampling at 105% each time) Which will be sharper?
|
|
|
|
05/05/2004 01:12:44 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
05/05/2004 01:15:08 PM · #3 |
I have heard that bicubic SI is "argueably" better.
So I have never tried genuine fractals. |
|
|
|
05/05/2004 04:07:03 PM · #4 |
|
|
|
05/05/2004 04:11:09 PM · #5 |
Supposedly the "new" sampling algorithms in Photoshop CS are better than the stepwise upsampling procedure.
If you do a search of the forums for "fractal" you should find at least 2-3 old threads where people discuss their experience with Genuine Fractals and other similar programs. |
|
|
|
05/05/2004 07:21:48 PM · #6 |
I have photoshop CS who have the bicubic, bicubic smoother and bicubic sharper algorythm and I have genuine fractals also. I find bicubic SI 105% to be sharper but with Genuine Fractals I find my photo more natural looking. I made several test with both and both are comparable with a 100% crop the bicubic SI being little sharper but for the general aspect of the image I prefer Genuine fractals a lot.
Message edited by author 2004-05-05 19:22:30.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/18/2025 01:48:49 PM EDT.
