| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/02/2013 08:13:27 PM · #1 |
| Pick any image that was DQ'D and reshoot, then process it with expert editing. |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 08:37:29 PM · #2 |
| Hehehe... with or without text? ;) |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 09:00:41 PM · #3 |
| What if we were DQd in expert? |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 09:05:01 PM · #4 |
| I love expert, but why expert? |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 09:05:42 PM · #5 |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 10:38:00 PM · #6 |
| I'm just curious as to why Frank thinks this particular challenge should be that rule set. That's all. |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 11:12:14 PM · #7 |
| I would guess it's because a second DQ is much less likely with expert editing. 90% of the DQs here wouldn't have been DQ'd in expert. |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 11:32:37 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by bohemka:
I would guess it's because a second DQ is much less likely with expert editing. 90% of the DQs here wouldn't have been DQ'd in expert. |
That's my thinking |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 11:46:21 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by bohemka:
I would guess it's because a second DQ is much less likely with expert editing. 90% of the DQs here wouldn't have been DQ'd in expert. |
I'm guessing quite a bit less -- a large number of DQs are for date violations or failure to produce a valid original and have nothing to do with the editing.
ETA: Still, wouldn't the "challenge" be to reproduce the image under the same rule set as the original without getting DQ'd yourself? I don't see that much point in doing it under other rules ...
Message edited by author 2013-03-02 23:48:51. |
|
|
|
03/02/2013 11:51:46 PM · #10 |
Ive never had a DQ...Does it have to be yours
|
|
|
|
03/02/2013 11:55:35 PM · #11 |
| I would imagine you could pick from any image that has been dq'd or the majority of people wouldn't be able to enter at all! |
|
|
|
03/03/2013 01:11:26 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by bohemka:
I would guess it's because a second DQ is much less likely with expert editing. 90% of the DQs here wouldn't have been DQ'd in expert. |
I'm guessing quite a bit less -- a large number of DQs are for date violations or failure to produce a valid original and have nothing to do with the editing.
ETA: Still, wouldn't the "challenge" be to reproduce the image under the same rule set as the original without getting DQ'd yourself? I don't see that much point in doing it under other rules ... |
Fair point on my DQ percentage estimate. Only the SC would know that. That said, I think the interesting DQs that Frank is talking about are not of the "no valid original" variety, but rather of the "this was a stunning piece of work but was DQ'd because of a slip in editing" flavor. There is a long list. |
|
|
|
03/03/2013 05:43:52 AM · #13 |
|
|
|
03/03/2013 07:55:31 AM · #14 |
| How about we have a challenge where we try to get one over on SC. It would be fun watching them validate every image. |
|
|
|
03/03/2013 11:54:56 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
How about we have a challenge where we try to get one over on SC. It would be fun watching them validate every image. |
Better put a smiley on that post, you maniac :-) |
|
|
|
03/03/2013 12:50:57 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
How about we have a challenge where we try to get one over on SC. It would be fun watching them validate every image. |
Oh you pot-stirrer, you! |
|
|
|
03/03/2013 01:55:36 PM · #17 |
I have a whole bloody folder of DQ'd shots =( lol
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 03:00:08 AM EDT.
