| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/26/2012 03:11:09 PM · #1 |
This is a really interesting read and woke me up to something I guess I had been assuming for years....... Figured some might find it interesting (prob not the creative only don't tell me about hardware types though :-) ).
The Online Photographer (link) |
|
|
|
09/26/2012 03:35:22 PM · #2 |
Good discussion. Perhaps a little esoteric for many non-technical folks, but pretty well explained. One of the really important, and counter-intuitive points he makes is that if you increase the dynamic range of a sensor (by adding electron capacity) the native ISO of the sensor goes *down.* Makes sense once you think about it; bigger capacity, takes longer exposure to saturate at a given condition, so lower native ISO.
|
|
|
|
09/26/2012 03:42:58 PM · #3 |
| Excellent! Thanks for pointing it out. |
|
|
|
09/26/2012 03:55:36 PM · #4 |
Scary ...
Originally posted by Linked Article:
The ISO standard for in-camera light metering and auto-exposure, ISO 2721:1982, hasn't changed in thirty years. It's still applicable to modern DSLRs. But... in the case of multi-zone metering systems like matrix metering and evaluative metering, the standard essentially becomes "whatever looks good."
So there we are: the metering and auto-exposure may be based on whatever the manufacturer thinks looks good, the sensitivity is based on whatever the manufacturer thinks looks good, and furthermore the in-camera JPEG conversion is based on whatever the manufacturer thinks looks good ... |
|
|
|
|
09/26/2012 04:09:59 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Scary ... |
Meh... looks good to me! ;-)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/01/2025 07:07:29 PM EDT.
