| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/19/2012 02:09:29 PM · #1 |
Hi all, I'm toying with the idea of getting a Canon 10-22mm wide angle lens to go with my 18-55mm kit lens. Obviously, the main reason to get such a lens is for landscape/seascapes, which my current 18mm just doesn't do satisfactorily. Will be spending a week at the beach in May getting married, so thought it would be perfect time to invest in a wide-angle and probably a 10-stop ND filter too.
I know Sigma/Tokina and others make similar lenses, but are they as good as the Canon which appears to be a great lens (sans the vignetting) according to most review sites I have looked at?
This will go on my 1.6x crop sensor Canon 550D. |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 02:15:22 PM · #2 |
I'm very happy with the Tamron 10-24, though it seems to be the least popular choice among DPC folks.
|
|
|
|
03/19/2012 02:16:38 PM · #3 |
| I had the sigma and was very happy with it |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 02:31:54 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:
I'm very happy with the Tamron 10-24, though it seems to be the least popular choice among DPC folks. |
+1 -- I love my Tamron 10-24 |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 02:35:43 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by markwiley:
Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:
I'm very happy with the Tamron 10-24, though it seems to be the least popular choice among DPC folks. |
+1 -- I love my Tamron 10-24 |
+2, im about to crash your exclusive club...
Message edited by author 2012-03-19 14:36:32. |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 02:37:54 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
+2, im about to crash your exclusive club... |
Welcome aboard the USS Tammy!
|
|
|
|
03/19/2012 02:39:06 PM · #7 |
I've had the 10-22 when I was using Canon cameras; I now have the Sigma 10-20 for my Nikon.
The Sigma is a very good lens, and at a bargain price. That being said, the Canon is an even better lens, at a higher but reasonable price.
I can't speak for the rest. |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 02:57:26 PM · #8 |
see for yourself
the canon is clearly the best of the group, especially the edge to edge sharpness, but it also costs a lot more too. |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 03:02:11 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Neil:
I've had the 10-22 when I was using Canon cameras; I now have the Sigma 10-20 for my Nikon.
The Sigma is a very good lens, and at a bargain price. That being said, the Canon is an even better lens, at a higher but reasonable price.
I can't speak for the rest. |
I was lucky enough to buy Neil's 10-22 off of him and the lens has been nothing but great. On my first entry with that lens I even got a blue with it. :)
I now have the tokina 11-16 f/2.8 and have to throw in my vote for that lens too. It's built like a tank and also comes with a hood. Not sure how often you'd use your ultra wide for hand held, low light situations but having f/2.8 is fantastic. The Tokina is sharper than both my 10-22s also.
Cons for the Tokina: The loss of 1mm on the wide end is noticeable and the extra 6mm of reach also makes a huge difference. |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 03:23:39 PM · #10 |
I just beat Neil's high score on the canon 10-22. :P
It's an awesome lens. I wouldn't consider any other. It's pricier, but worth it. |
|
|
|
03/19/2012 03:35:45 PM · #11 |
| I have the Sigma 12-24. I love it. Unless you're going to go full frame, you don't need it. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/03/2025 04:26:39 PM EST.
