Good ol' FILM - Ongoing Image thread

02/15/2012 02:25:43 PM · #676

02/16/2012 10:59:53 AM · #677

A different Trip 35 & different film.

02/16/2012 11:45:46 AM · #678

Paul, very well done. I'm struck by the presumed quality of the negatives. I'm still learning.

Message edited by author 2012-02-16 11:47:16.

alexlky

02/16/2012 01:51:09 PM · #679

alexlky

02/16/2012 11:56:15 PM · #680

ubique Below images from few brands of expired films for comparison.

02/17/2012 06:22:57 AM · #681

Thanks Alex. It's interesting. The 'expired' look is actually one that appeals to me. Maybe because I have an expired look myself these days, alas.

02/18/2012 01:33:43 AM · #682

02/18/2012 02:46:06 PM · #683

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

02/23/2012 06:11:03 AM · #684

Just an interesting link for followers of our film forum thread:

"Why I Shoot Film" by Steve Coleman, a landscape photographer.

Seems like a sensible, thoughtful blogger; he does of course have the considerable advantage of being an Australian.

daisydavid

Canon EOS-5DS R

02/23/2012 06:33:03 AM · #685

Thanks Paul, it is truly beautiful work. I hope it inspires a few more to try film. I particularly like his view that the camera is only a small part of the vision. I don't know how many times I've heard this from those who produce outstanding artworks.

03/05/2012 06:56:53 AM · #686

I keep stopping by to see what's going on. Made me wonder why I haven't renewed my membership....
Having fun with instant film from The Impossible Project.

Message edited by author 2012-03-05 06:59:48.

03/05/2012 10:01:23 AM · #687

Ah, good to have you back Tom. I'm glad you posted this here.

03/05/2012 07:21:39 PM · #688

03/05/2012 07:42:25 PM · #689

Tom, added details for this image. Camera is a ZeroImage Multiformat (6x6,6x9,6x4.5) medium format pinhole. Aperture is f/235.

bvy

Sigma DP1x

03/05/2012 08:45:13 PM · #690

Tom, you asked about the Spectra. No luck this weekend. Here's the first exposure though to give you an idea. Unimpressive, but I'll keep trying.

bvy

Sigma DP1x

03/07/2012 07:36:18 AM · #691

This guy's exposing Instax 210 in a 4x5 and developing it with... a rolling pin:
//www.apug.org/forums/forum234/102647-instax-210-film-4x5.html

03/07/2012 01:04:37 PM · #692

Originally posted by bvy:

This guy's exposing Instax 210 in a 4x5 and developing it with... a rolling pin:
//www.apug.org/forums/forum234/102647-instax-210-film-4x5.html

Time for an Instax Pinhole, eh Brian?

03/08/2012 09:49:22 AM · #693

Wow, that is wild.

Here is an image from the maiden roll of my new to me Mamiya C22. Developed in Rodinal 1:100, 10 seconds of agitation initially, then 2 inversions every 2 minutes for 20 minutes @ 68F. I thought less agitation would help get more detail out of the ocean as the sun is in the frame. Negatives were a bit underdeveloped, corrected in Lightroom/Nik Silver.

03/09/2012 02:26:30 PM · #694

Nikon AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED

03/10/2012 01:25:33 PM · #695

Message edited by author 2012-03-10 14:14:03.

wlevy

Nikon D90

03/10/2012 09:20:01 PM · #696

My wife Tania in labor 31 years ago. Leica IIIf, 50mm f/2.8, Ilford HP5, good old D76.

From my brief stint doing freelance photojournalism in the 90s. Nikon F3, 200mm f/4, I think this was Tri-X and D76. The photo editor said this was too "artsy" to print in the paper.

Our younger son Roger, circa 1994, as Mom finished cutting his hair. Leica M5 I think, 90mm f/something, also HP5 and D76 I think.

wlevy

Nikon D90

Nikon AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED

03/10/2012 09:25:00 PM · #697

Another shot from the same wrestling tournament. I always thought this was hilarious because of the illusion that one wrestler's body is going through the other.

One more. My profile photo is a self-portrait I did around 25 years ago. Nikon F, probably, and Agfachrome.

Message edited by author 2012-03-10 21:26:04.

03/13/2012 04:03:30 PM · #698

03/16/2012 08:58:27 AM · #699

I haven't run out of instant film yet...