Author | Thread |
|
12/16/2011 08:59:33 AM · #1 |
When you invoice someone for using your photo without permission, and they very politely write back with a justifiable request that you prove you're the owner, and an offer to work things out to get them resolved, how do you prove it?
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:01:44 AM · #2 |
Exif Data? If the image is a duplicate, won't it not show the original exif data? |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:08:11 AM · #3 |
that wouldn't be good proof...if you edit the pic or anything it also notes different dates
unless u have the original RAW maybe
Message edited by author 2011-12-16 09:08:55.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:09:03 AM · #4 |
The original photo with the exif shows the camera's serial number. You should be able to use that, shouldn't you? |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:10:06 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by cowboy221977: that wouldn't be good proof...if you edit the pic or anything it also notes different dates
unless u have the original RAW maybe |
That's what i'm saying. Show them the Exif from the original image file. |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:10:22 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip: When you invoice someone for using your photo without permission, and they very politely write back with a justifiable request that you prove you're the owner, and an offer to work things out to get them resolved, how do you prove it? |
How often does this happen to you? |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:11:02 AM · #7 |
Do you have the original unedited image? Or, better yet, a raw file as well? Nobody else is likely to have either of those. Additionally, if you have other images of the same subject, from the same scene, shot at the same time, that would help as well.
ETA: dang! Those were some fast replies. Looks like I Yanko'd all over myself. ;-)
Message edited by author 2011-12-16 09:12:56.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:13:58 AM · #8 |
You very politely inform them that you: a) have the original file from your camera, b) have similar, non-published images in your archive and c) you have the images registered with the copyright office. |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:16:27 AM · #9 |
It's the first time it's happened to me. But if I were in this guys shoes, I'd be asking the same question.
What is the photographer to do, hold up a printout of some possibly fabricated EXIF with the camera serial number highlighted, while holding the camera and somehow showing it's possibly fabricated serial number while holding today's newspaper?
I wouldn't want to send original files to anyone. I could send a heavily-watermarked full-size, or a small crop at full size.... ?
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:21:48 AM · #10 |
why do you have to prove your the photo owner you have that information i would think they would have to prove they are the owner if it goes to court. just have a lawyer ask them for proof with the stipulation that if they can't prove ownership you will sue them. bet you they start talking money pretty fast then. |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:29:06 AM · #11 |
Tell them you have the original file--best if it's RAW. With EXIF.
And you have the rest of the series shot at the same time, also corroborating.
But don't send them anything, you can get someone to witness it if you want, and have it signed.
You'll sign an affidavit of authenticity.
Then tell them anything beyond that you'll be happy to discuss in court.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:32:47 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by Neil: Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV. |
Maybe you should be. |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:35:47 AM · #13 |
Slippy my camera writes my name in the EXIF files and I keep all my original files. Hard drive space is so cheap now. |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:37:55 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by Spork99: You very politely inform them that you: a) have the original file from your camera, b) have similar, non-published images in your archive and c) you have the images registered with the copyright office. |
ditto this is one of the main reasons for registering with your country's copyright office
Message edited by author 2011-12-16 12:04:23. |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:45:18 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by drz01: Hard drive space is so cheap now. |
Tell me where. With all the HD factories flooded, even Intel put out a notice..
//ibnlive.in.com/news/intel-says-sales-hit-by-hard-drive-shortage/211427-11.html
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:45:40 AM · #16 |
I still have the three RAW files I used to make the photo, an HDR, though you wouldn't realize it by looking at it.
I wrote him back to let him know that, and offered a small crop of a detail not possible from the sized-down version his designers lifted. We'll see what he says, he sounds pretty reasonable from his first email. My email, while cordial, wasn't that polite.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:48:48 AM · #17 |
Bah, what the heck, here's the web page.
//www.beecool.ca/beecool_comm.html
Scroll down a bit, it's the night skyline, which now has some text on it RE 3M night vision window film. Sadly, the quality is horribly degraded compared to my original.... and they pasted over the reflection!
Message edited by author 2011-12-16 09:50:36.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 09:48:57 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip: I still have the three RAW files I used to make the photo, an HDR, though you wouldn't realize it by looking at it.
I wrote him back to let him know that, and offered a small crop of a detail not possible from the sized-down version his designers lifted. We'll see what he says, he sounds pretty reasonable from his first email. My email, while cordial, wasn't that polite. |
I bought 3 3tb drives in the spring when they were $129 each but even now you can get them for about $200
Message edited by author 2011-12-16 09:51:10. |
|
|
12/16/2011 09:54:44 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by drz01: Originally posted by Strikeslip: I still have the three RAW files I used to make the photo, an HDR, though you wouldn't realize it by looking at it.
I wrote him back to let him know that, and offered a small crop of a detail not possible from the sized-down version his designers lifted. We'll see what he says, he sounds pretty reasonable from his first email. My email, while cordial, wasn't that polite. |
I bought 3 3tb drives in the spring when they were $129 each but even now you can get them for about $200 |
I save everything. I plan on spending my senile, invalid years, watching my slide shows and videos.... and peeing in a bag.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 10:19:34 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by Skip: Originally posted by Spork99: You very politely inform them that you: a) have the original file from your camera, b) have similar, non-published images in your archive and c) you have the images registered with the copyright office. |
ditto this is one of the main reasons for registering with your country's copyright office |
And if you didn't register it when you created it...do it now. I don't know how it is up north, but here in the US, there are benefits if it's registered at the time of infringement, but if it's not, there are still good reasons to register it ASAP. |
|
|
12/16/2011 10:31:40 AM · #21 |
Originally posted by Spork99: Originally posted by Skip: Originally posted by Spork99: You very politely inform them that you: a) have the original file from your camera, b) have similar, non-published images in your archive and c) you have the images registered with the copyright office. |
ditto this is one of the main reasons for registering with your country's copyright office |
And if you didn't register it when you created it...do it now. I don't know how it is up north, but here in the US, there are benefits if it's registered at the time of infringement, but if it's not, there are still good reasons to register it ASAP. |
Canadian copyright laws are VERY friendly to the photographer, really no use to register unless you want to spend some extra time & money.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 11:39:58 AM · #22 |
Well, you've already taken action, but I would have first asked him what he considered "proof". |
|
|
12/16/2011 11:55:24 AM · #23 |
.
Message edited by author 2011-12-16 13:24:16.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 02:59:52 PM · #24 |
I mainly use DPP for handling my RAW files. So go to the programme that handles your RAW files and take a screen-shot of your raw thumbnails of that shoot and then Watermark the screen-shot with your name and do a SFW before sending it to them. That is proof in itself that you can show them all the consecutive numbers around that photo. Being a watermarked and small res screen-shot means they can't do much with it. Your originals will be protected. Also tell them the size of the original but don't tell them the exact time it was taken (make sure that info is not visible on the screen-shot). If it goes to court and your lawyer asks them what time their copy was taken...they won't be able to answer...where as you can and you have the proof. Signed, sealed and delivered.
|
|
|
12/16/2011 03:27:15 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Well, you've already taken action, but I would have first asked him what he considered "proof". |
His idea of what constitutes "proof" isn't really important, it's how the law interprets it.
It's probably easiest to try to convince the guy without resorting to the legalese, but one could just as easily ask him to show he legitimately licensed the rights to the photo. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/13/2025 04:35:34 PM EDT.