| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 02:51:26 PM · #1 | 
		| | Hello everyone, 
 I'm looking for a new camera bag, and I like the look of the crumpler bags  //www.crumpler.com  but I wanted to know if anyone has experience with the 8 million dollar home bag? I need to fit a 7D w/ battery grip and Canon 28-300L lens attached, Canon 70-200L, Canon 24-70L, iPad, and various other things in the bag comfortably.
 
 Thanks
 
 Dan
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 03:50:47 PM · #2 | 
		| | I have a crumpler but not that one. I've heard the million dollar homes bags are very good though. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 03:57:13 PM · #3 | 
		| | I have a smaller crumpler bag for when i take the camera with just one lens, they are of comparable quality to all the other good camera bag makers, very trendy also IMO. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 04:10:06 PM · #4 | 
		| | I have the 7 million and it wouldn't hold all of that - at all.  Personally don't love my bag.  I had a D300 - 24-70 mounted - 70-300 in the bag and that is it.  My son put it on top of my suitcase and it rolled off the bag onto the ground (probably a 2.5 foot drop) and lens broke off and apart - 70-300 got a loose screw - top lcd of camera cracked.  I was surprised at how much damage was incurred.  $600 later everything is back to the way it was.  UGH!!! | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 04:16:24 PM · #5 | 
		| | Hmm don't know how comfortable I'd feel, toting around anything as fragile as a camera in a brand-named bag called Crumpler...a big ol Lowepro knapsack is entrusted with my gear. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 04:30:10 PM · #6 | 
		| | I LOVE my 7 million dollar and it can hold a LOT of cra... er... valuable necessary stuff :-) Not sure about those lenses but I can fit in 5-6 lenses with a gripped 7D and a flash and couple of triggers and what not.... but it ain't light with it all in there. 
 More critical to you... The 70-200f4 will NOT fit while attached to the body with my 1 inch hood... never tried without the hood but I would guess not or real real tight if it did.  I assume the 28-300 is quite a bit longer.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 04:33:12 PM · #7 | 
		| | I've got a couple crumplers and will attest to their quality, though I've never seen that model. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 04:57:45 PM · #8 | 
		| | FWIW I've got the 6 million.  Very sturdy and is water and stain resistant. Lacks outside pockets - annoying. Could be more comfortable on the shoulder. Never had any damage despite clumsiness and rough handling. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 05:24:08 PM · #9 | 
		| | I have a smaller Crumpler and use it around the town and when traveling. It does not look like a camera bag and that's a big plus. Inside it is nicely padded, has useful pockets, and I never had any problems with it. I also have a very comfortable matching camera strap. Both highly recommended. For dragging around more gear and flying I prefer a Kata backpack (see //www.kata-bags.com/) with an attachable front bag I can use while cycle touring. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 05/25/2011 05:53:40 PM · #10 | 
		| | Thank you all for the feedback. 
 Dan
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 01:34:31 PM EDT.