| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/28/2010 06:37:50 PM · #1 |
hello all.
i am sure this may have been discussed previously, but i searched "basic editing border" and didn't get any relevant results.
here's my question
under Basic Editing, you are allowed to add a border, as long as it is "distinct and clearly recognizable as a border." OK, easy enough. But what about a border that is added such that the border fades in instead of being a sharp line delineation between the border and the photo. it would still be a border, but would it be "distinct" enough.
like this (bottom/right side vs. top/left side)
Or would it be considered a "vignette effect" and get the image DQ'd?
many thanks!
-mefnj
|
|
|
|
11/28/2010 06:40:22 PM · #2 |
You can't do that in basic. It constitutes "spot editing".
R. |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 06:45:04 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
You can't do that in basic. It constitutes "spot editing".
R. |
what is "spot editing"? the fade or the border itself? just trying to clarify your response.
-mefnj |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 06:51:28 PM · #4 |
The fade. It's in effect (if not in actuality) applying a gradient on the border, fading it from transparent-to-opaque, and that is spot editing ΓΆ€” the singling-out of specific portions of the image for a localized effect.
R. |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 06:52:54 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
The fade. It's in effect (if not in actuality) applying a gradient on the border, fading it from transparent-to-opaque, and that is spot editing ΓΆ€” the singling-out of specific portions of the image for a localized effect.
R. |
gotcha. thanks for the feedback.
-mefnj |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 06:54:29 PM · #6 |
this was allowed in basic. Validated during the challenge
|
|
|
|
11/28/2010 06:59:03 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by scarbrd:
this was allowed in basic. Validated during the challenge
|
Really? So much for MY advice, LOL. I'm amazed.. mefnj, just ignore me, I don't know from squadoosh...
R. |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 07:58:35 PM · #8 |
| If you have time, pre-submit your photo for validation to the SC. I think the photo you posted would be challenged because the borders are not the same all the way around. |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 08:01:27 PM · #9 |
mefnj - Try using edit->stroke and lower the opacity within the stroke dialogue window. Keep the blending normal. This will mellow the border in a general sense ...but I don't know how to do a wispy one in basic.
scarbrd - Hey I'd be interested to know your steps for that border. Thanks. |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 08:30:34 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by scarbrd:
this was allowed in basic. Validated during the challenge
|
Really? So much for MY advice, LOL. I'm amazed.. mefnj, just ignore me, I don't know from squadoosh...
R. |
That was in 2007. I also assumed that it wouldn't be legal (but probably because I don't know how to do it without spot editing. :)
Are we sure it's still legal, now?
|
|
|
|
11/28/2010 08:32:45 PM · #11 |
| i also wondered the same, but with a border that was just a thin line set inside a few pixels |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 08:48:52 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
Are we sure it's still legal, now? |
I cannot give you a confirmed answer either way, but I would assume nothing. If it was my picture, I would submit a ticket with before/after versions well ahead of the deadline to poll the current SC members on the matter.
My personal opinion is that under the current version of the rules this would be an added vignette, and not legal under the current Basic rules. |
|
|
|
11/28/2010 09:16:57 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by scarbrd:
this was allowed in basic. Validated during the challenge
|
Really? So much for MY advice, LOL. I'm amazed.. mefnj, just ignore me, I don't know from squadoosh...
R. |
That was in 2007. I also assumed that it wouldn't be legal (but probably because I don't know how to do it without spot editing. :)
Are we sure it's still legal, now? |
This challenge was right after a rules update. I don' think the border rules or vignette rules have changed since then, but maybe they have. There was some discussion, but it did pass. But like the General says, submit a ticket. But beware, the pre-challenge check with the SC will only get you an opinion or 2. It is not a guarantee that an image will be considered legal or illegal in the actual challenge.
|
|
|
|
11/28/2010 09:28:39 PM · #14 |
| There are too many rules and "the rent is too damn high". |
|
|
|
11/29/2010 06:36:29 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by David Ey:
There are too many rules and "the rent is too damn high". |
Sorry you feel that way. You don't have to pay to be here. You don't even have to be here if you don't want. Constructive suggestions always welcome, however. |
|
|
|
11/29/2010 08:32:11 PM · #16 |
Ha Ha....I didn't mean here. The rent is just fine here. You didn't hear of "The Rent Is Too Damn High" political party?
Party Website
The Song |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/07/2025 01:17:14 PM EDT.
