Author | Thread |
|
03/14/2004 11:21:08 PM · #1 |
Have any of you used the Extensis plugins for photoshop? I downloaded the demos of two of the programs and one of them is a poster ripper. It is suppose to make photos 1600% bigger without quality loss. I was playing around with a 640X427 photo and enlarged it to 3000X4500 and I couldn't believe how good it looked. You could hardly tell that it came from a small web sized photo. It seems like an awesome program and worth it if you are going to need HUGE photos! |
|
|
03/14/2004 11:43:49 PM · #2 |
Where did you get the poster ripper plugin from? I'd like to give it a try!
|
|
|
03/15/2004 12:02:56 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by mcrael: Where did you get the poster ripper plugin from? I'd like to give it a try! |
oops, sorry. The plug-in can be found here- pxL SmartScale |
|
|
03/15/2004 01:11:55 AM · #4 |
I use extensis and have had great success with it! I took a shot from a 2.1MP camera and got it to look great at 16x20 printed!
|
|
|
03/15/2004 03:39:54 AM · #5 |
I don't know the poster ripper plugin, but I have used the Extensis Intellihance plugin in the past which was good, especially if you don't have much time to work on a photo and want to get the best out of it quickly. |
|
|
03/15/2004 02:34:25 PM · #6 |
I think that Intellihance is pretty good too. I think that when I do my sisters wedding that I'm just going to make an action and run all the photos through that so I don't have to open each one of them.
With SmartScale last night I tried to make one of my photos a 40X60 at 300PPI and after a half hour I decided just to shut down my computer cause it was almost 3. It was almost half way done. |
|
|
03/15/2004 10:43:47 PM · #7 |
Speaking of upsampling algorithms, this picture shows a comparison of various up-rez algorithms.
The original is on the top left, which is down-sampled to 25% (top-right), and then various algorithms are used to up-sample it back up to "original size" (equivalent to taking a 300dpi 4x6 print and up-sampling it to a 300dpi 16x24 print).
The "Vector" and new "Pyramid" algorithms are part of the awesome Qimage software.
By the way, the gross-looking "pixel resize" sample is equivalent to the "digital zoom" in many cameras (which is why it should be avoided).
Unfortunately it doesn't include a comparison of Extensis pxl.SmartScale, but since the 25%-reduced original is there, it should be easy to "up-rez" it 4X and compare it if you are interested.
If you want giant-size prints, Qimage rocks!
Message edited by author 2004-03-15 22:45:06. |
|
|
03/15/2004 10:46:54 PM · #8 |
After reading this post, I decided to give a try to Pxl Smartscale because at my job I often have to resize some images. It's fast and doing great but unless you are in a real hurry , Bicubic 5% and a little sharpenning with PS do a better job by far IMHO.
This is a picture i doubled the size with the extensis plugin.
This is the same crop from the same picture wich i double the size too but with bicubic 5% sharp.
|
|
|
03/16/2004 01:30:53 AM · #9 |
Hey thanks for posting those photos. That was a great comparison. Thanks! |
|
|
03/16/2004 06:04:13 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by EddyG: Speaking of upsampling algorithms, this picture shows a comparison of various up-rez algorithms. |
The Jensen-Xin Li SAR hybrid results are very impressive, although it might be a little extreme with the Jensen application (I'm pretty sure it's tunable though). You can grab SAR and try various enlargements yourself. Of course, I have to agree about the excellence of Qimage. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/22/2025 05:31:19 PM EDT.