Author | Thread |
|
11/01/2010 11:17:27 AM · #26 |
Very excited for you Wendy. That's a score I wish I could see again. Your doing something right. |
|
|
11/01/2010 11:20:24 AM · #27 |
Reaching for my lowest score so far on DPC, a 4.7. I'm not surprised, the picture I took is, imo, awful. It wasn't that bad 4am this morning when I submitted it, but now when I'm wide awake, phew, it's not my best photo so to speak. I'm surprised that I'm on 4.7 at all, I would give my self a three if I was voting on that picture. |
|
|
11/01/2010 11:26:12 AM · #28 |
|
|
11/01/2010 11:41:22 AM · #29 |
At this rate it'll end up as a 9... Fortunately (for everyone else), I'm sure the trend will break soon, but it has been a very good morning..
Votes: 33
Views: 73
Avg Vote: 6.2424
Comments: 2 |
|
|
11/01/2010 11:56:44 AM · #30 |
.
Message edited by author 2010-11-01 14:01:52.
|
|
|
11/01/2010 01:16:33 PM · #31 |
i'm surprised i'm above 6. i think this is mid 5 type shot but there's still time.
not complaining like i normally do of course : )
Votes: 37
Views: 86
Avg Vote: 6.0811
Comments: 1 |
|
|
11/01/2010 02:51:10 PM · #32 |
Now 3 comments, all expressing the same mis-apprehension about my photo - very frustrating, given that I got up before dawn three times and spent hours out in the cold and wet. |
|
|
11/01/2010 02:59:48 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by SaraR: Now 3 comments, all expressing the same mis-apprehension about my photo - very frustrating, given that I got up before dawn three times and spent hours out in the cold and wet. |
oh no! (now you have me wondering if I expressed apprehension in any of my comments so far...)
|
|
|
11/01/2010 03:07:51 PM · #34 |
No, no comment from you, but don't get me wrong - I am glad people have left the comments - always better to know what it is that people don't like about a photo, or that how they see a photo is different to the intent that the photographer had. |
|
|
11/01/2010 06:42:59 PM · #35 |
Votes: 48
Views: 108
Avg Vote: 6.5208
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0
Solid! Great comments too! |
|
|
11/01/2010 06:57:42 PM · #36 |
Originally posted by vawendy: Originally posted by SaraR: Now 3 comments, all expressing the same mis-apprehension about my photo - very frustrating, given that I got up before dawn three times and spent hours out in the cold and wet. |
oh no! (now you have me wondering if I expressed apprehension in any of my comments so far...) |
misapprehend = To interpret incorrectly; to misunderstand
IN other words, no apprehension necessary to misapprehend :-)
R. |
|
|
11/01/2010 07:45:57 PM · #37 |
Want to buy voters that have calibrated monitors. That is all. |
|
|
11/01/2010 07:52:48 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by northebound: Want to buy voters that have calibrated monitors. That is all. |
Not sure how well that would work...
But in lieu of that, you're certainly welcome to buy me a calibrated monitor :) |
|
|
11/01/2010 07:55:25 PM · #39 |
Originally posted by coryboehne: Originally posted by northebound: Want to buy voters that have calibrated monitors. That is all. |
Not sure how well that would work...
But in lieu of that, you're certainly welcome to buy me a calibrated monitor :) |
Eh, judging by your shots - I doubt you have need of one. But, when I hit the lottery, you're first on my list since you suggested with a smiley :) |
|
|
11/01/2010 08:00:05 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by northebound: Originally posted by coryboehne: Originally posted by northebound: Want to buy voters that have calibrated monitors. That is all. |
Not sure how well that would work...
But in lieu of that, you're certainly welcome to buy me a calibrated monitor :) |
Eh, judging by your shots - I doubt you have need of one. But, when I hit the lottery, you're first on my list since you suggested with a smiley :) |
oooh!! me next, me next! :) :) :)
Actually, I'm very curious -- I'm wondering whether my monitor is too light. Everything that I print is dark, so I need to brighten everything before I print.
Message edited by author 2010-11-01 20:01:20.
|
|
|
11/01/2010 08:10:39 PM · #41 |
Eh, I can't complain too much. i knew this shot was horrendous the moment I submitted it. Dumb animal crossed my path while I was shooting and I got the lame idea "Hey! wildlife! I'll submit this!"
Note to self: take time to post-process nature photos on this site - and also take notice of the challenge rules. Stupid me thought it was basic. No chance.
4.6863
I think I might stick with my favorite subjects. |
|
|
11/01/2010 08:22:08 PM · #42 |
Originally posted by northebound: Originally posted by coryboehne: Originally posted by northebound: Want to buy voters that have calibrated monitors. That is all. |
Not sure how well that would work...
But in lieu of that, you're certainly welcome to buy me a calibrated monitor :) |
Eh, judging by your shots - I doubt you have need of one. But, when I hit the lottery, you're first on my list since you suggested with a smiley :) |
Sweet, finally, I'm first on a list.... :)
Message edited by author 2010-11-01 20:22:19. |
|
|
11/02/2010 07:19:55 PM · #43 |
You have rated 97 of 98 images (99%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 23 of 98 images (23%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 5.8041.
|
|
|
11/02/2010 07:31:45 PM · #44 |
Originally posted by coryboehne: Votes: 4
Views: 9
Avg Vote: 5.5000
Comments: 1 |
Quite the climb on this image!
Votes: 76
Views: 161
Avg Vote: 6.3026
Comments: 6
Message edited by author 2010-11-02 19:32:46. |
|
|
11/02/2010 07:47:08 PM · #45 |
You have rated 99 of 99 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 27 images (27%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 6.5960.
Nice work. But not a single party in the lot. Lame. |
|
|
11/02/2010 10:43:35 PM · #46 |
Votes: 74
Views: 164
Avg Vote: 5.8514
Comments: 2
Two very nice comments! |
|
|
11/03/2010 04:17:12 AM · #47 |
There are very good images in this challenges but unfortunately a lot of them fall down on not meeting the challenge description mostly on the last part of it! I hope the voters have also read and understood it! For the purpose of this challenge, "wildlife" should be considered non-domesticated mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians living in a NATURAL ENVIRONMENT! Birdfeeders are not natural environments! |
|
|
11/03/2010 04:18:45 AM · #48 |
Just thought that I would post this, since I have never seen it before (on one of my images) and can't imagine when I am likely to see it again...
Votes: 84
Views: 189
Avg Vote: 7.0476
Comments: 10
|
|
|
11/03/2010 05:36:49 AM · #49 |
Originally posted by sulamk: There are very good images in this challenges but unfortunately a lot of them fall down on not meeting the challenge description mostly on the last part of it! I hope the voters have also read and understood it! For the purpose of this challenge, "wildlife" should be considered non-domesticated mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians living in a NATURAL ENVIRONMENT! Birdfeeders are not natural environments! |
Whilst it doesnt affect me, i think you are being rather anal about this, whats not to say that over the past 50 years birdfeeders havent become part of a birds natural habitat. lighten up poppet. |
|
|
11/03/2010 05:46:12 AM · #50 |
My comments suggest a heap of people think mine is DNMC, which is somewhat frustrating and disappointing. Decent enough score, so i can't really complain, but it goes up and down like a yo-yo, even with just one extra score added. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/29/2025 11:05:46 AM EDT.