| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/07/2010 02:54:01 PM · #1 |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 02:56:46 PM · #2 |
| the 2 don't look nothing alike. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 02:58:54 PM · #3 |
Definite ripoff. You could sue :-)
R. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 02:59:57 PM · #4 |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 03:17:09 PM · #5 |
| yours is much better. I'm seriously not really impressed by that gull photo. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 03:21:15 PM · #6 |
| I had to look very closely before I could even tell the difference. I'm guessing they took yours and edited it slightly. It's an outrage. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 03:26:59 PM · #7 |
| I'd lawyer up right away. This could be your ticket! |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 03:30:19 PM · #8 |
| Send him a DPC threat to never ever photograph a water drop or you'll sue him for water-drop infringement. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 05:56:25 PM · #9 |
Ha!
Surprised that that photo won, though. If I had taken that photo it wouldn't even occur to me to enter it in a contest. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 06:23:22 PM · #10 |
| I think the judges were giving this gull too much credit. Its not being too defiant to move. Its just too stupid to get out of the way. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 06:26:21 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Citadel:
I think the judges were giving this gull too much credit. Its not being too defiant to move. Its just too stupid to get out of the way. |
That's where we get the word "gullible", probably :-)
R. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 06:33:09 PM · #12 |
@tate:
Now... had you taken a picture of yourself while setting up for and taking your shot... "defiant Photographer", perhaps in B&W, would have been an instant classic.
|
|
|
|
10/07/2010 08:41:32 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Citadel:
I think the judges were giving this gull too much credit. Its not being too defiant to move. Its just too stupid to get out of the way. |
I agree. That wave looks more like a bucket of water being thrown at it.
Message edited by author 2010-10-07 20:41:48. |
|
|
|
10/07/2010 10:39:58 PM · #14 |
I did an overlay of the two photos and only found a slight difference in them. It appears there was just a slight rotation to keep the photo from appearing as an exact copy. I think they also did a slight white balance adjust to change the color of the bird.
This is a gross infringement of intellectual rights/copyrights. |
|
|
|
10/11/2010 12:45:19 PM · #15 |
HA!
thanks for the laughs everyone!
I was also a bit surprised â€Â¦ maybe the environmental headline could be:
"Polluted waters make birds deaf and possibly stupid enough to just plain not know what's going on."
Originally posted by kawesttex:
I did an overlay of the two photos and only found a slight difference in them. It appears there was just a slight rotation to keep the photo from appearing as an exact copy. I think they also did a slight white balance adjust to change the color of the bird.
This is a gross infringement of intellectual rights/copyrights. |
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 04:09:40 AM EST.
