| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/20/2010 11:40:37 AM · #1 |
This was going to happen eventually:
# Comments:Made: 8,515
# Helpful: 8,089
# Received: 6,666
# Helpful: 6,632 |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 11:42:35 AM · #2 |
don't worry -- you have one too many sixes. The devil only has 3 of them.
I heard that 666 could be wrong -- that there are other documents that list a different number.
From wikipedia:
The number is 666 in most manuscripts of the New Testament, and in modern translations and critical editions of the Greek text. Although Irenaeus (2nd century AD) affirmed the number to be 666 and reported several scribal errors of the number, there is still doubt by some theologians about the original reading, as some recently-discovered 3rd century early manuscripts of Revelation read 616. This topic is a source of contention for many church groups and theologians.
Message edited by author 2010-09-20 11:44:09.
|
|
|
|
09/20/2010 11:50:47 AM · #3 |
| I fixed it for you, of course now you do have 3 6's... oops |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 11:53:37 AM · #4 |
.
Message edited by author 2010-09-20 11:53:57. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 11:57:52 AM · #5 |
Thanks for the comment, Josh! :o)
I'm just messin - I really like all the numbers and am not superstitious - well at least not very.
|
|
|
|
09/20/2010 12:01:01 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by keenon:
Thanks for the comment, Josh! :o)
I'm just messin - I really like all the numbers and am not superstitious - well at least not very. |
Ooops Lol
I'm always supisticious about seeing 666, for some reason, yet everything else im not towards, like black cats, breaking mirrors.. etc etc |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 01:27:57 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
don't worry -- you have one too many sixes. The devil only has 3 of them.
I heard that 666 could be wrong -- that there are other documents that list a different number.
From wikipedia:
The number is 666 in most manuscripts of the New Testament, and in modern translations and critical editions of the Greek text. Although Irenaeus (2nd century AD) affirmed the number to be 666 and reported several scribal errors of the number, there is still doubt by some theologians about the original reading, as some recently-discovered 3rd century early manuscripts of Revelation read 616. This topic is a source of contention for many church groups and theologians. |
A minister explained to me one time that it could also be that it isn't a NUMBER, but actually a name, that in English translations comes down as 666, or something like that. It was kind of a convoluted conversation, but interesting.
As a completely unrelated aside -- when my son was 6, he started playing football for the Bethel Demons. His number? 66.
(now he is 8 yo, and still number 66 for the demons). |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 01:47:00 PM · #8 |
| According to Isaac Asimov the "number of the beast" is a coded way of referring to a contemporaneous political mucky-muck (e.g. Emperor Nero) whom it would have been unwise (i.e. fatal) to criticize by name. The number is arrived-at by using one of the various numerology methods which associate letters of the alphabet with numbers, and then use various calculations to arrive at the final number. There have been many methods of calculating the number -- depending on whom the calculator wishes to designate as the evil one -- and so there have been many various attributions throughout history. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 01:54:58 PM · #9 |
666 is the number for the devil or anti-christ for this reason.
7-number of perfection and 6 is almost there, but not quite. The anti-christ is going to have many attributes and deceive people, will even suffer a mortal wound and be brought back.
the number 3 is a number for strength or unity, which is why you see the number 666.
777 is the number for God.
At least that is how I understand it. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 02:27:54 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
I heard that 666 could be wrong -- that there are other documents that list a different number. |
If that is the case, I feel sorry for all the satan worshippers with three sixes tattooed on their foreheads, who will face their leader in hell only to hear "Sorry, wrong number". I wonder where he'll send them... |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 02:36:46 PM · #11 |
There was quite a to-do a few years ago when the 616 version was publicized, as millions of Michigan residents suddenly found their phone numbers listed under Hell's area code ...
PS: I bet there are a lot of people -- perhaps even some posting in this thread -- who would pay extra to get a phone number with a 666 prefix ... ;-)
Message edited by author 2010-09-20 14:37:57. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 02:41:10 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
PS: I bet there are a lot of people -- perhaps even some posting in this thread -- who would pay extra to get a phone number with a 666 prefix ... ;-) |
and I'm sure many of them will eventually get it. ;-) |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 02:42:05 PM · #13 |
| There is already a Hell Michigan and it freezes over every year :) |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 02:44:36 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by mgarsteck:
There is already a Hell Michigan |
I thought it was called Detroit.
|
|
|
|
09/20/2010 03:09:19 PM · #15 |
My favorite graffiti said
668, the neighbor of the beast |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 03:17:10 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by franktheyank:
My favorite graffiti said
668, the neighbor of the beast |
Very handy if you need to borrow a cup of brimstone. ;-) |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 03:46:56 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
Originally posted by mgarsteck:
There is already a Hell Michigan |
I thought it was called Detroit. |
Rofl!!! |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 03:48:59 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
don't worry -- you have one too many sixes. The devil only has 3 of them.
I heard that 666 could be wrong -- that there are other documents that list a different number.
From wikipedia:
The number is 666 in most manuscripts of the New Testament, and in modern translations and critical editions of the Greek text. Although Irenaeus (2nd century AD) affirmed the number to be 666 and reported several scribal errors of the number, there is still doubt by some theologians about the original reading, as some recently-discovered 3rd century early manuscripts of Revelation read 616. This topic is a source of contention for many church groups and theologians. |
LOL a the could be wrong statement. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 04:12:52 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by karmat:
Originally posted by vawendy:
...there is still doubt by some theologians about the original reading, as some recently-discovered 3rd century early manuscripts of Revelation read 616. This topic is a source of contention for many church groups and theologians. |
A minister explained to me one time that it could also be that it isn't a NUMBER, but actually a name, that in English translations comes down as 666, or something like that.... |
Chalk one up for sloppy handwriting/translations. One day everyone will realize that the bible is really the book of dog. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 04:22:23 PM · #20 |
| Tell someone to hand copy a book that is thousands of pages long. Now have 5000 more people do it, in succession, with every 50th person translating it into a different language or dialect. Compare the first copy to the last. The difference would shock and amaze you. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 04:26:21 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
One day everyone will realize that the bible is really the book of dog. |
  |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 04:29:34 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
Originally posted by karmat:
Originally posted by vawendy:
...there is still doubt by some theologians about the original reading, as some recently-discovered 3rd century early manuscripts of Revelation read 616. This topic is a source of contention for many church groups and theologians. |
A minister explained to me one time that it could also be that it isn't a NUMBER, but actually a name, that in English translations comes down as 666, or something like that.... |
Chalk one up for sloppy handwriting/translations. One day everyone will realize that the bible is really the book of dog. |
The numerology stuff GeneralE referred to is kinda what I was getting at. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 04:35:01 PM · #23 |
| FWIW today's episode of Fresh Air features an interview with people involved in the rehabilitation of the dogs rescued from Michael Vick's dogfighting operation. |
|
|
|
09/20/2010 04:48:45 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by karmat:
Originally posted by vawendy:
don't worry -- you have one too many sixes. The devil only has 3 of them.
I heard that 666 could be wrong -- that there are other documents that list a different number.
From wikipedia:
The number is 666 in most manuscripts of the New Testament, and in modern translations and critical editions of the Greek text. Although Irenaeus (2nd century AD) affirmed the number to be 666 and reported several scribal errors of the number, there is still doubt by some theologians about the original reading, as some recently-discovered 3rd century early manuscripts of Revelation read 616. This topic is a source of contention for many church groups and theologians. |
A minister explained to me one time that it could also be that it isn't a NUMBER, but actually a name, that in English translations comes down as 666, or something like that. It was kind of a convoluted conversation, but interesting.
As a completely unrelated aside -- when my son was 6, he started playing football for the Bethel Demons. His number? 66.
(now he is 8 yo, and still number 66 for the demons). |
So, if that is true and it is 616, it's The Bible according to DOD! Or The Bible according to GOG! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/23/2025 12:00:17 PM EDT.
