Author | Thread |
|
05/08/2010 11:19:23 AM · #1 |
Anyone has it yet? If so, how are the new content aware tools? |
|
|
05/08/2010 11:34:44 AM · #2 |
Originally posted by maggieddd: Anyone has it yet? If so, how are the new content aware tools? |
I have it, and the content aware tool is very nice. Not perfect, but it does save me some time in removing items ;) |
|
|
05/08/2010 11:45:16 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by JaimeVinas: Originally posted by maggieddd: Anyone has it yet? If so, how are the new content aware tools? |
I have it, and the content aware tool is very nice. Not perfect, but it does save me some time in removing items ;) |
Cool thanks, do you have the beta version or the final release? |
|
|
05/08/2010 01:03:32 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by JaimeVinas: Originally posted by maggieddd: Anyone has it yet? If so, how are the new content aware tools? |
I have it, and the content aware tool is very nice. Not perfect, but it does save me some time in removing items ;) |
HOW DID YOU GET IT??????
|
|
|
05/08/2010 01:06:10 PM · #5 |
The smart remove tool plugins exists in GIMP since almost 3 years.
It's free : Resynthesizer |
|
|
05/08/2010 02:08:33 PM · #6 |
You can get it today from the adobe.com site.
It's 199 for upgrade and if you're a naap member 169
|
|
|
05/08/2010 02:50:51 PM · #7 |
I got mine on the 30th but haven't had a lot of time to play with the new features, so far no complaints. Hopefully today and tomorrow I can give it a good run for its money :)
-dave
ETA: Some are saying its only in the 64bit flavor, I can assure you its in both 32 and 64bit for PS CS5, I have the Web Suite Premium CS5...
Message edited by author 2010-05-08 14:52:20.
|
|
|
05/08/2010 03:19:41 PM · #8 |
Well, I am downloading a trial version RIGHT NOW!! |
|
|
05/08/2010 04:43:45 PM · #9 |
I think the Content Aware Fill works well, for the most part. I'd say that in "most" cases, it gets me about 75-80% there, and I tweak the rest by hand with clone.
There are times when your jaw will drop at what it does, and there are times where you wonder what's wrong with it. I generally try it first with a loose selection just outside what I need to fill and it works well. Sometimes you will have to do a very close selection and maybe even work it in pieces. All in all a good tool.
Here's an image where it nearly did it in one fill and well enough that I was pretty satisfied with what it did, I just had to mask back the hand and a little bit of the grass/flowers. Took me less than 30 seconds to get rid of the other person.
Here's an image where it got me about 70% there, but had to be worked in pieces. I tried it with the whole person first and it didn't work well, so took it in pieces - head and shoulders, then lower body, then midsection, then I had to tweak the wall and driveway. Took about 1-1 1/2 mins.
Message edited by author 2010-05-08 17:11:56. |
|
|
05/08/2010 06:10:34 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by LindaLee: I think the Content Aware Fill works well, for the most part. I'd say that in "most" cases, it gets me about 75-80% there, and I tweak the rest by hand with clone.
There are times when your jaw will drop at what it does, and there are times where you wonder what's wrong with it. I generally try it first with a loose selection just outside what I need to fill and it works well. Sometimes you will have to do a very close selection and maybe even work it in pieces. All in all a good tool.
Here's an image where it nearly did it in one fill and well enough that I was pretty satisfied with what it did, I just had to mask back the hand and a little bit of the grass/flowers. Took me less than 30 seconds to get rid of the other person.
Here's an image where it got me about 70% there, but had to be worked in pieces. I tried it with the whole person first and it didn't work well, so took it in pieces - head and shoulders, then lower body, then midsection, then I had to tweak the wall and driveway. Took about 1-1 1/2 mins.
| thanks Linda. |
|
|
05/08/2010 08:29:19 PM · #11 |
UUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
...it's only for intel architecture. WHY? I've been waiting so long!?
:(
|
|
|
05/08/2010 09:49:31 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by ApertureJack: ...it's only for intel architecture. WHY? |
Welcome to 2010. ;-) |
|
|
05/09/2010 02:34:26 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by Louis: Originally posted by ApertureJack: ...it's only for intel architecture. WHY? |
Welcome to 2010. ;-) |
Did someone say 1984? ;) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/08/2025 10:23:41 AM EDT.